India hits China wall in anti-terror talks

[Areesh]

Have you ever posted anything other than trolling that also of very low quality? Try something better as you can never post anything better than troll.

Obviously a genuine troll like you can tell us about how to troll and that too with high quality. .

Anyways a douche bag like you isn't worthy enough to give opinion about quality of someone's post. So buzz off munnai.

 

[notsuperstitious]

If you did not understand Fateh's post, he didn't mean internal peace of China but letting other countries live in peace. Check the rank of countries China calls friends in this list.

Oh please, he's just fulflling his mandate of posting the peace index five times daily on all kinds of threads. Don't take his trolling seriously.

As to the hotels attacks on unarmed civilians in Mumbai, those douchebags and their douchebag supporters were supported by a douchebag country in UNSC!!! And now some douchebags are bragging about it here, what cowards!

 

[Areesh]

Oh please, he's just fulflling his mandate of posting the peace index five times daily on all kinds of threads. Don't take his trolling seriously.

He is proud of what his country has achieved and the way his country has compelled it's particular hostile neighbor to pray desperately for something like 9/11. Nothing wrong with that in my opinion.

 

[fakein]

Like GoI, some Indian members, readily taking what might be plausible as credible, seem to ignore principles and mechanism by which a government is run and diplomacy practiced. It would be irresponsible and inconsiderate of any country to act on inadequate information and unverified allegations. Some countries are astute enough to utilize such plausibility to harness the enthusiasm and patriotism of the public to particular ends, sanction countries that do not collude with them or even create the pretext for invasion, as instanced by what US has inflicted on Iraq and Afghanistan. But the results of such flippancy and unilateralism could be disastrous to both ends.

People, if not blinded with nationalistic fervor or other traumatic horror, are sane to expect countries to exercise conservatively rather than radically. Still, some Indian delegation has obviously admitted the inadequacy of the evidence and will revert with more substantial information. So it is safe to say, such communication and negotiation would not only be helpful to tackle possible terrorism, but also healthful to India's growth as a countable and responsible country.

Off-topic
Interesting and confusing, or even contradictory is that India, while not bold enough to defy China's sovereign claim on Tibet (fair to say not a country is bold enough), indulges itself in playing trick of harboring Tibetan exile government, which seems to be supported by CIA. Was it China hasn't provided sufficient evidence or their existence and activities or India simply ignores what it sees and hears?

 

[luckyyy]

Maulana Masood Azhar ?

is he not going to reveal the real truth on who were actually planed and executed the plane hijeck IC 814 to get him realeased from indian jail ?

 

[notsuperstitious]

He is proud of what his country has achieved and the way his country has compelled it's particular hostile neighbor to pray desperately for something like 9/11. Nothing wrong with that in my opinion.

What his country has achieved is used some failed countrie to do their dirty work. In the process they give two hoots about what happens to the peace index of those ''friendly'' countries.

There's nothing wrong in licking china's behind though, for this favor! There may not be a tomorrow, go at it vigorously!

Interesting and confusing, or even contradictory is that India, while not bold enough to defy China's sovereign claim on Tibet (fair to say not a country is bold enough), indulges itself in playing trick of harboring Tibetan exile government, which seems to be supported by CIA. Was it China hasn't provided sufficient evidence or their existence and activities or India simply ignores what it sees and hears?

What rubbish, India does not have UNSC veto, so in the spirit of earlier part of your post, why does not China present their ''evidence'' to UNSC???

India has not allowed any violent activity against China for decades, maybe its time India started the game of ''plausible deniability'' in response to this smug chinese attitude!

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Interesting and confusing, or even contradictory is that India, while not bold enough to defy China's sovereign claim on Tibet (fair to say not a country is bold enough), indulges itself in playing trick of harboring Tibetan exile government, which seems to be supported by CIA.

'Was' would be the right choice, after 1962 Tibetans refugees were trained in case of a future war with China, however after normalizing ties the Tibetans form a border police force .

Was it China hasn't provided sufficient evidence or their existence and activities or India simply ignores what it sees and hears?

Forget sufficient evidence , your Govt hasn't provided any evidence or even made a claim of their supposedly anti-Chinese activities

On the whole Tibet is incomparable in the current context ,

Tibetans don't go on a killing rampage in any Chinese city.

Tibetans aren't the one creating trouble in Xinjaing.

However the groups China has attempted to stall are affiliated to Al-Qaeda , which has vowed revenge for Xinjiang also caused problems in the CARs.

 

[fakein]

Even ignoring the riots in 2008 in Tibet, non-violence justifies NOT the act of harboring an exile government whose aim is to separate Tibet from China, albeit under the guise of autonomy. Dalai Lama, in the eyes of most Chinese, is no more than a clown enrolled in CIA's payment list, and, when his utility to disturb China's development and create chaos in Tibet exploited, is doomed to be shunned and dumped in the dust of history. Clearly everyone knows the intention, disparate from what US claims, of CIA's involvement in the Tibet affairs, if he is not biased against China or fuddled enough to worship democracy for democracy's sake, or religion for religion's sake. Thus China has every reason to deem India's accommodation of DL and his exile government as not friendly, and perceive such act as India's stake of bargaining with China, which is yet gradually drained out of feasibility. So, should India complain getting burned when it stubbornly determines to play with fire?

But let the Tibetan issue end here; it's not really related to the current topic.

As stated in the Indian media's report, India hadn't come up to Beijing with sufficient evidence of the alleged affiliation between the two, and China reasonably rejected to take action before adequate information and prudent consideration. But as a whole, the Indian report has made a misleading title followed with a obfuscating narrative on this event, which, from any angle of perspective, was natural and normal. This fuss, having its roots in the media's adversely attitude towards China, is of no need and no use. So people, Indian or Chinese, can positively expect that when substantial evidence is presented, China and India could work out a plan to counter terrorism in affected area.

 

[lem34]

Another example of China causing unrest in Asia.

So you say but we dont have the detail or what the chinese interpretation was to this meeting or what happend. article was in indian express. To make my mind up i would have to read what the chinese papers say as well

 

[luckyyy]

i do not think it's at all nessesery for india to presude china to blacklist these terrorists...
after all they has been doing a great work in pakistan's progress , isn't we like a progressive pakistan ?...why should we try to hamper pakistan progress by blacklisting these jihadies ...

 

[lem34]

i do not think it's at all nessesery for india to presude china to blacklist these terrorists...
after all they has been doing a great work in pakistan's progress , isn't we like a progressive pakistan ?...why should we try to hamper pakistan progress by blacklisting these jihadies ...

You are so funny I can troll better than you but I choose not to.

 

[Areesh]

What his country has achieved is used some failed countrie to do their dirty work. In the process they give two hoots about what happens to the peace index of those ''friendly'' countries.

The fact is that China has no or extremely minute hand in disturbing peace either in those so called failed friendly states or it's hostile states who are allegedly future super power and can't even save their federal capital from terrorist bombings.

There's nothing wrong in licking china's behind though, for this favor! There may not be a tomorrow, go at it vigorously!

Humm it is based on how you understand things. The difference between alliance and licking behind is difficult to understand for some citizens of impoverished nation.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

The fact is that China has no or extremely minute hand in disturbing peace either in those so called failed friendly states or it's hostile states who are allegedly

Its not overt but certainly they do affect the stability in the long run.

future super power and can't even save their federal capital from terrorist bombings.

When did China have terrorists bombing over its federal capital ,besides USA being a hyperpower couldn't prevent bombing of its trade centers in its financial capital.

Humm it is based on how you understand things. The difference between alliance and licking behind is difficult to understand for some citizens of impoverished nation.

Yes! coupled with that a military regime and many religious extremists and illiterates it is indeed a challenge for Pakistan

 

[Dalai Lama]

Humm it is based on how you understand things. The difference between alliance and licking behind is difficult to understand for some citizens of impoverished nation.

Nah, I think we understand better than some.

Ally: One who comes to your rescue when you're getting your *** handed to you.
Master: One who throws you a bone every now and then to keep their "behind" moist.

Hope that clears things up.

 

[Areesh]

Its not overt but certainly they do affect the stability in the long run.

According to you yes. In reality No.

When did China have terrorists bombing over its federal capital ,besides USA being a hyperpower couldn't prevent bombing of its trade centers in its financial capital.

I was not talking about china but some other country who claims to be future super power and has war zones in parts of it's own country.

Yes! coupled with that a military regime and many religious extremists and illiterates it is indeed a challenge for Pakistan

The worst part is that even illiterates of Pakistan understand it which it's eastern neighbor fails to understand. Sigh.



---------- Post added at 02:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:40 PM ----------

Nah, I think we understand better than some.

Ally: One who comes to your rescue when you're getting your *** handed to you.
Master: One who throws you a bone every now and then to keep their "behind" moist.

Hope that clears things up.

Let me simplify it even further.

Ally: One who gives a sh!t to the Blah Blah of your enemy and makes it nothing but frustrated
Master: You can indeed give a better definition since you have too many masters in last 1000 years or so.

Clear?