What's new

'India has simulation capability, N-tests not needed'

glomex

BANNED
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
610
Reaction score
0
'India has simulation capability, N-tests not needed'

Joining issue with an ex-DRDO scientist that Pokhran-II was not a full success and India needs to go for a few more nuclear tests, Atomic Energy commission chief Anil Kakodkar on Wednesday said the country has strong simulation capability and that additional tests were not required.

"We have enough data. We have comprehensive simulation capability and therefore there is no need for any more tests," Kakodkar said, days after K Santhanam ignited a controversy that Pokhran-II was a fizzle and did not give the desired yield. "We are very confident about the simulation capability,"

Indian nuclear scientists had already validated and bench marked the validated tool of the three dimensional simulation for earth motion and displacement data collected following Pokhran II tests in 1998, he said.

"We used the data of Beneberry nuclear tests of US of December 18,1970 to validate our 3-D simulation for earth motion and displacement and this validated tool was used for bench marking," Kakodkar said.

There is no need for series of tests to validate the yield since the tool and also observations are available, he said adding that it was published in the international journal Nuclear Technology in 2006 four years after its communication from Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC).

Scaling up of nuetronic calculation can always be done, he said adding that all the observations and calculations were done by scientists from BARC.:yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo:
 
. .
Just on lighter side....... To check whether simulation is correct or not we have to do real Nuclear Test.
 
. .

I dont agree. If India has even an iota of doubt about its H-bomb capabilities, it should test. Nuclear weaponisation is meaningless without TN capabilities. No one builds an ICBM of 8000/12000 KM range without TN warheads and MIRV. . Kakodkar is a government employee. He is therefore saying things palatable to a government scared of the "fallout".
 
.
when even test is not reliable what you can do and say? oh well indian govt will come up with another line of lie to cover this, do not worry.
 
.
when even test is not reliable what you can do and say? oh well indian govt will come up with another line of lie to cover this, do not worry.

Well, its never your business, when you have not been able to find out even the simple grenade technology.... You are blind folded by the jealousy and anger you have towards us, and you find this forum to express it when you have no guts to stand anywhere near the border... :rofl:
 
.
ouch...sensitive. Did any one find out why it took more than 10 years for truth to come out?
 
.
Listen, take the carrot out of your behind and put it in your mouth.
Why don't to take the lead since unhygienic stuff like staying uncircumcised, drinking urine are nature of your types? :sniper:
 
.
ouch...sensitive. Did any one find out why it took more than 10 years for truth to come out?

Yup, India was going to Sign Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty(CTBT) , so Mr.Santanam said, we need to conduct more tests ans the 5th or 6th test did not give the desired yield as they expected and wanted to conduct another before signing... and You guys make a big fuss out of this saying all the crap in here...
 
.
Well, at this rate, India can go to the next stage and skip even simulations. Just do the theory. Now, that's real progress...

Q: What's the difference between theory and practice?
A: In theory, there is no difference...

I can see a battle scenario...

Commander: Why didn't the bomb explode?
Soldier: Well, we did our simulations on a Mac, but the bomb is running Pentium...:(
 
.
Well, at this rate, India can go to the next stage and skip even simulations. Just do the theory. Now, that's real progress...

Q: What's the difference between theory and practice?
A: In theory, there is no difference...

I can see a battle scenario...

Commander: Why didn't the bomb explode?
Soldier: Well, we did our simulations on a Mac, but the bomb is running Pentium...:(

Excuse me, we are talking about India not pakistan.... thanks :cheers:
 
.
Well, at this rate, India can go to the next stage and skip even simulations. Just do the theory. Now, that's real progress...

Q: What's the difference between theory and practice?
A: In theory, there is no difference...

I can see a battle scenario...

Commander: Why didn't the bomb explode?
Soldier: Well, we did our simulations on a Mac, but the bomb is running Pentium...:(

Thats the good one!!!:rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom