India has more rich people than poor now

[Banglar Lathial]

2011 Failed States Index - Interactive Map and Rankings | Foreign Policy

Bangladesh :: Economy

According to outdated statistics of 2001, Bangladeshi GDP was some $230 billion based on PPP, much more than the economy of any much-hyped Indian metropolis in 2010.

 

[Ammyy]

The BD government is an Indian Hindutva-radical stooge. Also, they would LOVE to publish such statistics if they could, because it would boost FOREIGN EXCHANGE RESERVES of the country. Hiding such statistics, quite impossible anyway, would be harmful for their cause because most people already curse them for poor economic management. If they could, why would not they publish statistics of a greater FOREIGN EXCHANGE RESERVE as a propaganda tool for their own political party?

So basically you are our stooge

 

[lightoftruth]

Mumbai accounts for slightly more than 6% of India's economy contributing 10% of factory employment, 40% of income tax collections, 60% of customs duty collections, 20% of central excise tax collections, 40% of foreign trade and rupees 40,000 crore (US $10 billion) in corporate taxes to the Indian economy.[2] Headquarters of a number of Indian financial institutions such as the Bombay Stock Exchange, Reserve Bank of India, National Stock Exchange, the Mint, as well as numerous Indian companies such as the Tata Group, Essel Group and Reliance Industries are located in Mumbai.

World Development Indicators and Global Development Finance - Google Public Data Explorer
Free Online Calculator for home, work, and school use this to see 6% of indian gdp .

 

[Banglar Lathial]

GDP (purchasing power parity): $258.6 billion (2010).

Bangladesh GDP (purchasing power parity) - Economy

Just above Mumbai PPP GDP (2008) .

It means that Indian BS claims have been exposed again?

By the way, Bangladeshi GDP based on PPP was REVISED DOWNWARDS (by Western Jewish agencies) by about 40% for some unexplained reason. Learn that Bangladeshi GDP based on PPP in 2006, at about the time BNP and allies left power, was estimated at $336 billion. By now, that estimate for GDP should have reached about $500 billion+ due to constant 6%+ growth rates during the six years inbetween.


http://www.eurasiacenter.org/Country%20reports/South%20Asia/Bangladesh%20Economic%20Overview.pdf

 

[IndoCarib]

According to outdated statistics of 2001, Bangladeshi GDP was some $230 billion based on PPP, much more than the economy of any much-hyped Indian metropolis in 2010.

Now you dont mind posting domestic BD newspapers to support your claim ?? How about international source ?

 

[Banglar Lathial]

So basically you are our stooge

I am not a member of BAL.

 

[Ammyy]

I am not a member of BAL.

Whatever you are doesn't matter .... Its upto government what they want

Indian stooge

 

[IndoCarib]

It means that Indian BS claims have been exposed again?

By the way, Bangladeshi GDP based on PPP was REVISED DOWNWARDS (by Western Jewish agencies) by about 40% for some unexplained reason. Learn that Bangladeshi GDP based on PPP in 2006, at about the time BNP and allies left power, was estimated at $336 billion. By now, that estimate for GDP should have reached about $500 billion+ due to constant 6%+ growth rates during the six years inbetween.


http://www.eurasiacenter.org/Country%20reports/South%20Asia/Bangladesh%20Economic%20Overview.pdf

There you are caught again .

http://www.eurasiacenter.org/Country...20Overview.pdf

This link quotes CIA fact book. The CIA fact book itself says this :

BD GDP PPP ---- $282.5 billion (2011 est.)

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bg.html

 

[Ammyy]

It means that Indian BS claims have been exposed again?

By the way, Bangladeshi GDP based on PPP was REVISED DOWNWARDS (by Western Jewish agencies) by about 40% for some unexplained reason. Learn that Bangladeshi GDP based on PPP in 2006, at about the time BNP and allies left power, was estimated at $336 billion. By now, that estimate for GDP should have reached about $500 billion+ due to constant 6%+ growth rates during the six years inbetween.


http://www.eurasiacenter.org/Country%20reports/South%20Asia/Bangladesh%20Economic%20Overview.pdf

Do you even notice this ???

In your source ??

 

[Banglar Lathial]

There you are caught again .

http://www.eurasiacenter.org/Country...20Overview.pdf

This link quotes CIA fact book. The CIA fact book itself says this :

BD GDP PPP ---- $282.5 billion (2011 est.)

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bg.html

Oh dear!!! Is it Indian illiteracy at work again?

That was the estimate for 2006. For some unexplained reason, the estimate was REVISED DOWNWARDS by about 40% since then, which is why, the current estimate of GDP based on PPP is only some $282 billion.

Edit: Look, another Western, non Muslim source also posted the same estimate for 2006.

http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-502203_162-3328816.html

If not for the unreasonable downward revision in 2006, the estimate for GDP based on PPP would be above $500 billion now.

 

[IndoCarib]

Oh dear!!! Is it Indian illiteracy at work again?

That was the estimate for 2006. For some unexplained reason, the estimate was REVISED DOWNWARDS by about 40% since then, which is why, the current estimate of GDP based on PPP is only some $282 billion.

That means your claim of this is bogus

"By now, that estimate for GDP should have reached about $500 billion+ due to constant 6%+ growth rates during the six years inbetween."

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...ich-people-than-poor-now-8.html#ixzz1x2Ba2Okc

 

[SamantK]

Oh dear!!! Is it Indian illiteracy at work again?

That was the estimate for 2006. For some unexplained reason, the estimate was REVISED DOWNWARDS by about 40% since then, which is why, the current estimate of GDP based on PPP is only some $282 billion.

which means in effect all this time you have been speculating what the figures should be without supporting data?

 

[Banglar Lathial]

In 2006, when nominal GDP was about $70 billion, the GDP based on PPP was $336 billion.
Economy of Bangladesh

What should be the GDP based on PPP now with about $120 billion in nominal GDP?

Do you even notice this ???

In your source ??

What is that? I got no time to deal with worthless symbols.

which means in effect all this time you have been speculating what the figures should be without supporting data?

No. It means you do not understand the simple arithmetic involved.

 

[IndoCarib]

In 2006, when nominal GDP was about $70 billion, the GDP based on PPP was $336 billion.
Economy of Bangladesh

What should be the GDP based on PPP now with about $120 billion in nominal GDP?


I already showed CIA fact book link showing the present PPP GDP. Now give us some link to prove your claim of 500 billion $. Show us 'What is' , not 'what should be'

 

[Banglar Lathial]

In 2006, when nominal GDP was about $70 billion, the GDP based on PPP was $336 billion.
Economy of Bangladesh

What should be the GDP based on PPP now with about $120 billion in nominal GDP?

I already showed CIA fact book link showing the present PPP GDP. Now give us some link to prove your claim of 500 billion $. Show us 'What is' , not 'what should be'

Simple arithmetic. Show me a "link" for the value of (2.08^3)-(12+3.251), for example? Do you know how to use a calculator?