What's new

‘India has capacity to produce hundreds of new nuclear bombs’

.
the best part of indian nuclear program is that " the world is still guessing ."
Just like we kept the CIA and Nato guessing when we fooled them during Pokhran Nuclear tests in 1999.
 
.
This Nothing New I already Posted it way back It Reported By SPRI Way Back

EXCLUSIVE
India Is Building a Top-Secret Nuclear City to Produce Thermonuclear Weapons, Experts Say



Bush Administration Nuclear Policy Enabled India’s H-bomb Program :US Report

http://fpif.org/bush-administration-nuclear-policy-enabled-indias-h-bomb-program/


India may be embarking on a covert uranium enrichment project aimed at producing thermonuclear weapons, a number of sources have recently speculated.

This week, Reuters reported that analysts at IHS Jane’s believe that the uranium enrichment facility at the Indian Rare Metals Plant is able to produce about twice as much weapons-grade uranium as New Delhi will need to fuel its nuclear powered ballistic missile submarines in the future.


“Taking into account all the enriched uranium likely to be needed by the Indian nuclear submarine fleet, there is likely to be a significant excess,” said Matthew Clements, editor of IHS Jane’s Intelligence Review, according toReuters. “One potential use of this would be for the development of thermonuclear weapons.”

This assessment has been seconded by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). In arecent research brief, SIRPI noted, “A new unsafeguarded gas centrifuge facility appears to be under construction at the Rare Metals Plant near Mysore. India’s expanded centrifuge enrichment capacity has been motivated by plans to build new naval propulsion reactors, but the potential excess capacity could also signify its intent to move towards thermonuclear weapons by blending the current plutonium arsenal with uranium secondaries.”

http://thediplomat.com/2014/06/is-india-building-thermonuclear-weapons/


Experts worry that India is creating new fuel for an arsenal of H-bombs

Source :
https://www.publicintegrity.org/201...worry-india-creating-new-fuel-arsenal-h-bombs


India's Nuclear Facility of H-Bomb Production Cited By Both SPRI and US Report

challakere-tablet.png


Development Of the Mysore Facility Over Years

mysore.gif
 
. .
Maintaining is a costly affair.....the bomb, the missile, power supply, Manpower equipment to guard those, maintaining also the equipment etc..
 
.
Yes you fooled them even the whole Indian nation bu declaring it success while your own nuclear scientist call it dud. now cry me a river.
That guy yo quoting was Farce With No data to Back his claim Neither He was ever a Part indian nuclear Program .When BARC asked him to debate on Facts then He Run Like headless chicken He Not Even Qualified for the Job


Dr K Santhanam has taken charge as Director, Defence Food Research Laboratory, Mysore, wef 1 May 2000.

Dr Santhanam obtained his PhD in Biochemistry from the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. After a stint in the US as a Post- Doctoral Fellow and at VP Chest Institute, University of Delhi as Reader, he joined DFRL in 1976. In 1986, he was awarded a Visiting Fellowship in the US for two years to investigate the biochemical mechanism of induction/prevention of a food contaminant-induced liver cancer. He served as Director, Defence Research Laboratory, Tezpur, from April 1994 to August 1996. Later, he served at DFRL as Additional/ Associate Director.


'Fizzle' claim for thermonuclear test refuted
Source:http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article10457.ece?homepage=true

He was responding to the recent statement by a former defence scientist, K. Santhanam, that “the yield in the thermonuclear device test was much lower than what was claimed.” Mr. Santhanam, who cited only unspecified “seismic measurements and expert opinion from world over,” went on to say that this was the reason India should not sign the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT).

The stated success of the second generation nuclear device tested on May 11, 1998, was questioned at the time by a number of Western seismologists who said the seismic signatures detected by them were at variance with the claimed yield of 45 kilotons. Although the controversy subsided somewhat once scientists from the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre — which designed the weapon — published their scientific evidence, it is likely to be reignited once again since Mr. Santhanam represented the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) team at the Pokhran-II tests and is the first member of that group to echo the arguments of those who say the thermonuclear device failed to work properly.

“If Mr. Santhanam has any scientific data to back up what he has claimed, I am sure BARC scientists would be more than happy to debate it,” said Dr. Chidambaram. “Without that, this kind of statement means nothing.”:coffee:
 
Last edited:
.
Sorry for being naive. But practically do we really need 100s of nuclear bombs? Whats the purpose of having say more than 50?
 
.
the best part of indian nuclear program is that " the world is still guessing ."
Italian has been in power for 10 years, enough time to gather much information.

Sorry for being naive. But practically do we really need 100s of nuclear bombs? Whats the purpose of having say more than 50?
You need to ask this question to Americans. Why we need nuclear weapons at all? Or any kind of weapons. Hint:No hint.
 
.
Sorry for being naive. But practically do we really need 100s of nuclear bombs? Whats the purpose of having say more than 50?


Because nukes are overrated.

For destroying a city of size of Delhi, you would need around 50 nukes of maximum yield that Pakistan has. And India would need around 30 nukes per major city to destroy a Pakistani city.

That is the reason why we need to aim for more. A dozen or so nukes would not even do damage on the scale of a medium earthquake.
 
.
Please do name them .
Do your research, I assure you, you will find more than one, all intricately connected to your fledgling program and all senior scientists ie PHds with decades of experience.;)

You do realize the same report also accuses Pakistan of exaggerating actual yields:

httpwww,nuclearweaponarchive,org/India/IndiaRealYields.html
I am talking about Indian sources strictly, I think those folks know a darn sight more than you do and those Indian scientists refuting their claims have a clear agenda to make India look successful when in all reality everyone knows they failed bigtime........The Chinese, Russians, Americans, French , British and hell even the pint sized Israel must be:lol::rofl::omghaha: at the incompetency of your scientists and engineers, for heaven sake man you are a nation of over 1 billion ,claim to have world class IIT yet when it comes to the crunch you guys prove to be impotent time after time, I will not embaraass you any further.Bye

Because nukes are overrated.

For destroying a city of size of Delhi, you would need around 50 nukes of maximum yield that Pakistan has. And India would need around 30 nukes per major city to destroy a Pakistani city.

That is the reason why we need to aim for more. A dozen or so nukes would not even do damage on the scale of a medium earthquake.
LOL 50 Nukes to destroy Delhi, let me have a quiet word with you friend, it took 2 bombs of similar yields to the ones your nation has produced to make Japan, a ultra-proud nation of warriors that had never ever been conquered in their entire history submit to the arrogant yanks, India which has had its face rubbed into the ground by every Tom , Dick and Harry somehow suddenly becomes braver than the ultra-proud Japanese the original suicide bombers lol, give me a break, all the polytheists have done throughout their miserable history is bend over to Babar, Tamerlane.....Brits, the list is as long as the Ganges :lol::lol::lol: I suspect one strike over your Lok Sabha would wipe out your entire RSS govt, once the head of the snake has been removed India as a nation would fall apart because it is so artificial, all sub-nationalities that have been oppressed would declare independence fearing such attacks on their lands.Please do not embarrass yourself any further@A_Poster , logging off would be better for you.
@Zibago @The Sandman @PaklovesTurkiye @Moonlight
 
. . .
Do your research, I assure you, you will find more than one, all intricately connected to your fledgling program and all senior scientists ie PHds with decades of experience.;)

I know my facts.

You present your's, I will counter each one of them.
 
. .
LOL 50 Nukes to destroy Delhi,

Yes 50.

Research about area of effect of a nuke and enlighten yourself.

let me have a quiet word with you friend, it took 2 bombs of similar yields to the ones your nation has produced to make Japan, a ultra-proud nation of warriors that had never ever been conquered in their entire history submit to the arrogant yanks, India which has had its face rubbed into the ground by every Tom , Dick and Harry somehow suddenly becomes braver than the ultra-proud Japanese the original suicide bombers lol, give me a break, all the polytheists have done throughout their miserable history is bend over to Babar, Tamerlane.....Brits, the list is as long as the Ganges :lol::lol::lol:

Japan was already defeated and its king was looking for a way to end war.A nuke strike gave him a way to overrule Japanese military hardliners who wanted to fight till last men.

As for rest of your post, everyone who invaded India has to come through today's Pakistan. Pakistan is like a doormat ,a nation of defeated people, on which everyone cleaned its shoes. It is heartening to witness Pakistan carrying forward that legacy by losing every war it fights. Losing come naturally to people who live in area called Pakistan. As Afghans observed: "It doesn't suit pakistan to tell us how to fight wars when it has not won any".

And it does not beehove well for a defeated nation to try to talk smack to people who persevered and won. You may try to wash over your shame by claiming descent from some concubine of Arab sipahsalar, but in reality you would always remain second class convert mussali ,who bowed down to sword of ancestors of true Muslims, and would be treated as such by your Arab superiors. It is evident in you being treated as a slaves in middle east today, and in your slavish instincts which make you people pledge your life in defence of your Arab superiors as your blood is cheaper than that of a genuine Arab Muslim.


I suspect one strike over your Lok Sabha would wipe out your entire RSS govt, once the head of the snake has been removed India as a nation would fall apart because it is so artificial, all sub-nationalities that have been oppressed would declare independence fearing such attacks on their lands.Please do not embarrass yourself any further@A_Poster , logging off would be better for you.

If there was any chance of India falling apart, it would at least have started showing the cracks. In reality, apart from Kashmir, there is not even a secessionist movement anywhere in India. Even if Lok Sabha is wiped out, it would not affect India as India ,unlike Pakistan, is not held together on gunpoint; and India is anyway not run by central directive. Whole administrative machinery would be intact even after head is removed, and as head is not a monarch, a new head would be elected after we finish off Pakistan.

Hinduism does a much better job than Islam of uniting people.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom