What's new

India has an edge in aeronautics

ashok321

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
17,942
Reaction score
4
Country
Canada
Location
Malaysia
http://businessworld.in/article/India-Has-An-Edge-In-Aeronautics/28-09-2016-106256/

temvuo.png


Tejas — India’s advanced fighter — entered service in the Indian Air Force (IAF) on 1 July this year. Tejas is not an ordinary aircraft, but a fourth-plus generation fighter embodying very advanced technologies, like fly by wire systems, all digital cockpit, advanced composites, utility management systems, open systems avionics architecture, weapons management system with an array of air- to- air and air- to- ground weapons. It is also agile, highly manoeuvrable, light weight and among the smallest fighters, comparable to the best in the world.

At the Bahrain Air Show, it won the admiration of aviation experts and visiting Air Force teams. Some countries even showed interest in acquiring the aircraft. The IAF has committed to buy 120 of these fighters. In the long-run, it and the Indian Navy will need hundreds of Tejas variants. Plus, there is a huge potential for export. It is a cost-effective aircraft with a high ‘Bangs to Bucks’ ratio. Hindustan Aeronautics has also developed a range of helicopters with very advanced technologies.

The Tejas is the latest indigenous weapon system to enter service, but the DRDO has developed a large variety of sophisticated weapon systems. A range of missiles: the Prithvi, Dhanush, Agni, Akash, Nag, have all been developed in India. New missiles like Astra, LRSAM, MRSAM are in advanced stages of development. Brahmos, the only supersonic cruise missile in the world, is in regular production with enquiries from many countries. Pinaca, a versatile multi-rocket system, has proved its efficacy and is in great demand, too. A range of radars, sonars, torpedoes, UAVs and many other EW/electronic systems have also been developed by DRDO. India still imports 60 per cent of its requirements, however, mostly to meet the immediate needs of the services. But we (the scientific community) strongly believe India can reduce its imports significantly and become an exporting country, if some of the weaknesses in our Aviation & Defence (A&D) ecosystem are corrected.

Fortunately, the situation in India is changing in the positive direction. The offset policy (that ensures that up to 30 per cent of defence deals are re-invested in India), has brought in big private players into the A&D domain. With a vast array of developed systems now available within our country and large offset commitments likely, the government’s Make in India efforts , particularly in the area of military aviation, can be accelerated if the following benchmarks are applied.

Firstly, our aviation and defence domain need an ecosystem of OEMs with Tier 1, 2 and 3 SME partners supported by specialist industries for raw materials etc., such as aluminum alloys, titanium alloys, nimonics, carbon composites.

Next, joint ventures should be encouraged and facilitated in critical areas, such as gas turbine engines, flight controls, landing gears, etc. Production of electronics components/sensor elements needs to be accelerated, as these are critical for the A&D industry growth. And the Centre should establish costly test/process facilities and make them available to SMEs.

Finally, large projects such as the LCA Tejas have helped develop hundreds of technologies/equipment and to create an ecosystem of industries, laboratories and academic institutions. For continued growth of technology and strengthening of the ecosystem, it is essential for the Centre to continue supporting such development programmes.

The author is a former programme director of India’s light combat aircraft, Tejas
 
.
How is it when compared against jf-17 which is already in service and is due to be in Myanmar.
 
. .
We made and desined Tejas Indigenously while JF-17 is chinese desined and assembled in Pakistan..
Wrong. Pakistans aeronautics division have jointly cooperated in developing the jet.
Plus Tejas is not completely indigenous.
 
.
Wrong. Pakistans aeronautics division have jointly cooperated in developing the jet.
Plus Tejas is not completely indigenous.
Please state pakistan contribution on jf-17 other than assembling while Tejas is 69% indigenous which will be increasing in future(jet engine in development, Uttam AESA in development)
 
.
Please state pakistan contribution on jf-17 other than assembling while Tejas is 69% indigenous which will be increasing in future(jet engine in development, Uttam AESA in development)
Other than the high contribution of china in engine/radar/weapon and related systems department... the airframe was developed in house as claimed by Pakistani officials... they are developing block 2 upgrades to be integrated with new orders and existing aircraft... without Chinese help. China doesn't even need jf-17 tbh.
 
.
Other than the high contribution of china in engine/radar/weapon and related systems department... the airframe was developed in house as claimed by Pakistani officials... they are developing block 2 upgrades to be integrated with new orders and existing aircraft... without Chinese help. China doesn't even need jf-17 tbh.


LOL first post the link that shows the official, who claim this. Second Block 2 upgrade is been done by the Chinese, because all the Aerodynamic Data is with the Chengu, second most the electonics and sensors are Chinese, thus all the IPs are with the respective Chinese OEMs, third the engine is the Russian. And without any permission from the respective OEMs, no one could change a single Bolt design leave aside anything.
 
.
LOL first post the link that shows the official, who claim this. Second Block 2 upgrade is been done by the Chinese, because all the Aerodynamic Data is with the Chengu, second most the electonics and sensors are Chinese, thus all the IPs are with the respective Chinese OEMs, third the engine is the Russian. And without any permission from the respective OEMs, no one could change a single Bolt design leave aside anything.
U need to add that the B-variant is done by who????..... oh yes the chinese!!!!

and what is the official no. of block II...... wait .... no one know!.... not a single one in PAF colours!
 
.
Other than the high contribution of china in engine/radar/weapon and related systems department... the airframe was developed in house as claimed by Pakistani officials... they are developing block 2 upgrades to be integrated with new orders and existing aircraft... without Chinese help. China doesn't even need jf-17 tbh.
lol do u actually believe without an industrial base a country can directly devolop aircrafts . dude if they can call jf17 there indigenous damn then we surely can call su30 mki ours (but we wont as it is not )
 
.
LOL first post the link that shows the official, who claim this. Second Block 2 upgrade is been done by the Chinese, because all the Aerodynamic Data is with the Chengu, second most the electonics and sensors are Chinese, thus all the IPs are with the respective Chinese OEMs, third the engine is the Russian. And without any permission from the respective OEMs, no one could change a single Bolt design leave aside anything.
Look into YouTube about Pakistan aeronautical complex KARMA. One of them talks about manufacturing components/developing in house systems etc. maybe @DESERT FIGHTER can talk more about it.
 
.
Look into YouTube about Pakistan aeronautical complex KARMA. One of them talks about manufacturing components/developing in house systems etc. maybe @DESERT FIGHTER can talk more about it.
just use u r brain dude how many parts are needed for an jet and how much u can make in that 1 place just think rationally
 
.
lol do u actually believe without an industrial base a country can directly devolop aircrafts . dude if they can call jf17 there indigenous damn then we surely can call su30 mki ours (but we wont as it is not )
The development was a 50/50 split. Headed by mr. wei of chengdu. Pakistan aeronautical complex videos will help you. And everywhere I read about the jets.... says, Pakistan have the capability to manufacture all parts in house.
 
.
The development was a 50/50 split. Headed by mr. wei of chengdu. Pakistan aeronautical complex videos will help you. And everywhere I read about the jets.... says, Pakistan have the capability to manufacture all parts in house.

Lol, you're beyond logic.
 
. .
Other than the high contribution of china in engine/radar/weapon and related systems department... the airframe was developed in house as claimed by Pakistani officials.

Pakistan has no role in the development of the RD 93 engine. The airframe was developed in China.

The development was a 50/50 split. Headed by mr. wei of chengdu.

The JV was a 50-50 split. Not the development. China of course had better R&D infrastructure & personnel. If the development of K-8 was anything to go by, Pak involvement is very limited. Anyway Mikoyan was a consultant.

One of them talks about manufacturing components/developing in house systems etc.

Only very few systems have been indigenously developed by Pakistan.

Plus Tejas is not completely indigenous.

Is JF 17 completely indigenous?
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom