What's new

India firms up moves against Turkey cosying up to Pakistan

Arabs tried to conquer India but failed. Turks succeeded in conquering India but failed in converting most of it. Sorry but that boat has long sailed.
ottoman did not assimilate anyone. Arabs were seen as our Muslim brothers. Pakistan and the sample of turkey friendship. ABDURRAHMAN PESAVERÎ of Pakistani origin. Peshawarî, the first employee of the Turkish Grand National Relations, worked in Afghanistan as the first ambassador of the Turkish Grand National Assembly between 1920-22.
translategoogle
Osmanlı kimseyi asimile etmedi. Araplar bizim Müslüman kardeşlerimiz olarak görülüyordu. Pakistan ve türkiye dostluk örneği. Pakistan menşeli ABDURRAHMAN PESAVERÎ. Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi Hükumetinin ilk çalışanı olan Peşaver, Afganistan'da 1920-22 yılları arasında Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi'nin ilk elçisi olarak çalıştı.
 
Arabs tried to conquer India but failed. Turks succeeded in conquering India but failed in converting most of it. Sorry but that boat has long sailed.
We united our cultures. This fusion produced a new civilization. I don't know much about your official history thesis. But if the Turks were not so integrated with the people of the region, or if the aim was to destroy your ancestors, do you think India could preserve the diversity it has today?

What cultural trait or religious understanding have Turks abolished in India?

Outside of modern times , If you look at the general Turkish history, almost all of the wars of the Turks are within themselves. This is closely related to the understanding of the ancient state understandings and the traditions of the army-state. However, on this day, all of the lands that the Turks retreated continue their ancient features. The wars of Turks are not related to religion or cultural dynamics, but to state authority.
 
Last edited:
We united our cultures. This fusion produced a new civilization. I don't know much about your official history thesis. But if the Turks were not so integrated with the people of the region, or if the aim was to destroy your ancestors, do you think India could preserve the diversity it has today?

What cultural trait or religious understanding have Turks abolished in India?

Outside of modern times , If you look at the general Turkish history, almost all of the wars of the Turks are within themselves. This is closely related to the understanding of the ancient state understandings and the traditions of the army-state. However, on this day, all of the lands that the Turks retreated continue their ancient features. The wars of Turks are not related to religion or cultural dynamics, but to state authority.

Whichever areas of the world the Central Asian Turks conquered converted to Islam. Almost all. India mostly didn't. Turkey itself is an example of that. A people and culture that completely adopted the identity of its invaders and conquerors.
 
You guys are too emotional. I doubt most Turks feel that way. Even China for all its diplomatic backing has never intervened and helped Pak in a military conflict.

Are you stupid? For you Hindus, help is only when a foreigner comes and occupies your country for 100+ years and takes all your money back to their lands. You want the Chinese to invade your country and colonize you with Pakistan? Don't make stupid statements. China helps pakistan's military termendously and we are enough for you street shitters..

Arabs tried to conquer India but failed. Turks succeeded in conquering India but failed in converting most of it. Sorry but that boat has long sailed.

Muslims never tried to convert hindus..
 
Are you stupid? For you Hindus, help is only when a foreigner comes and occupies your country for 100+ years and takes all your money back to their lands. You want the Chinese to invade your country and colonize you with Pakistan? Don't make stupid statements. China helps pakistan's military termendously and we are enough for you street shitters..



Muslims never tried to convert hindus..
Clearly, you have no idea what you are talking about.
 
Arabs tried to conquer India but failed. Turks succeeded in conquering India but failed in converting most of it. Sorry but that boat has long sailed.
According to Islam, you cannot push anybody to change language or religion.. Thats the reason greece is still greece even after being 500 years under turkey, nearby Istanbul..
Saying that Turks couldn't changed us is funny. Those time, if you loose the fight, you loose everything... We saw how ENglish people changed you with only 100 soldiers..
 
Clearly, you have no idea what you are talking about.

Clearly, you have no reply. Support for you means boots on the ground right? Obviously, that is a stupid point of view and only one that you would form after drinking gandhi cola.
 
Unfortunately, I don't see the RSS mending its ways.

Too bad. The ideology of RSS is a very big threat for India. Our core national interest is a India (united & democratic) that has solved its problems with Pakistan by reconciliation. The ideology of RSS will be shatter India like a falling crystal.
 
Last edited:
According to Islam, you cannot push anybody to change language or religion.. Thats the reason greece is still greece even after being 500 years under turkey, nearby Istanbul..
Saying that Turks couldn't changed us is funny. Those time, if you loose the fight, you loose everything... We saw how ENglish people changed you with only 100 soldiers..

Nope. The British couldn't convert us to Christianity either. And the 100 soldiers part is laughable at best. You clearly don't know South Asian history and that's fine but don't reveal you lack of knowledge like this.
 
I don't think that 230 mio Pakistani are with him. Even you have asked all of them, but never 2 billion Muslims. Lets say 2 billion Muslims are with him. It doesn't help Turkey from economical damage by non Pakistanis and Muslims.
Seems you are against Erdogan's/Turkey support to Pakistan?
 
Nope. The British couldn't convert us to Christianity either. And the 100 soldiers part is laughable at best. You clearly don't know South Asian history and that's fine but don't reveal you lack of knowledge like this.
the only thing i know is 100 people conquered whole your country with your own people...
Why would anybody need to change you? you are like a english flag, give gold and even ask to kill your own people..
Either you are a kid or ignorant, you are the easiest people on earth.with a billion population, you couldnt win Turks where there were no rocket or automatic weapon. You think it is hard for any of those countries to change you if they wanted? the thing is neither England(which took 45 trillion dollar from you) nor Turkey really wanted to change you... Turks ruled CHine, they didnt change them too.. nor anywhere in the world.
 
the only thing i know is 100 people conquered whole your country with your own people...
Why would anybody need to change you? you are like a english flag, give gold and even ask to kill your own people..
Either you are a kid or ignorant, you are the easiest people on earth.with a billion population, you couldnt win Turks where there were no rocket or automatic weapon. You think it is hard for any of those countries to change you if they wanted? the thing is neither England(which took 45 trillion dollar from you) nor Turkey really wanted to change you... Turks ruled CHine, they didnt change them too.. nor anywhere in the world.

Turks changed Anatolia to Turkey. Constantinople to Istanbul.

Bottomline: Those who were strong and proud of their ancient roots clung to them. Those who were weak and not very proud of their roots, changed.

And yes, Indians helped the Brits to conquer other Indians. There was no nation state of India back then so there was no loyalty. That's not the case anymore. Anyway, this statement of yours holds true, not the BS you wrote about Brits conquering India with a 100 people.
 
Turks changed Anatolia to Turkey. Constantinople to Istanbul.

Bottomline: Those who were strong and proud of their ancient roots clung to them. Those who were weak and not very proud of their roots, changed.

And yes, Indians helped the Brits to conquer other Indians. There was no nation state of India back then so there was no loyalty. That's not the case anymore. Anyway, this statement of yours holds true, not the BS you wrote about Brits conquering India with a 100 people.
Dont talk about the things that you have no idea...
Turkish people didnt Turn the Anatolia to Turkey, they simply moved there from Mongol attacks. Bevause, Mongols, used to kill women, kids and everything if anybody dare to fight with them. Men, Boys, simply fight and send send their mother, wifes, kids, with younger brothers to Anatolia... Where they came with Huge numbers... If you ever go to Turkmenistan and Uzbakistan. you will still see that they look like todays Turkish people. Same about we Azerbaijanis..
If 100 people conquer your country, you are the last person to talk here... you really need to have a high quality skin to be proud of it, which im shocked..
You know why Turkish people choose Wolf they symbol? because you can make even tiger, bear do whatever you want for a piece of food, but you can never make wolfs do it... have you ever seen wolf in the show? thats our difference...
 
Dont talk about the things that you have no idea...
Turkish people didnt Turn the Anatolia to Turkey, they simply moved there from Mongol attacks. Bevause, Mongols, used to kill women, kids and everything if anybody dare to fight with them. Men, Boys, simply fight and send send their mother, wifes, kids, with younger brothers to Anatolia... Where they came with Huge numbers... If you ever go to Turkmenistan and Uzbakistan. you will still see that they look like todays Turkish people. Same about we Azerbaijanis..
If 100 people conquer your country, you are the last person to talk here... you really need to have a high quality skin to be proud of it, which im shocked..
You know why Turkish people choose Wolf they symbol? because you can make even tiger, bear do whatever you want for a piece of food, but you can never make wolfs do it... have you ever seen wolf in the show? thats our difference...

Most Central Asian people look mongoloid, Most people of Turkey are not Mongoloid looking. You guys are native Anatolians who look more similar to Greeks, Armenians etc. who adopted the Turkic way of life after the Turkic conquest of Anatolia because of perhaps an inferiority complex about your own culture. This wasn't the case with India, China or Greece.

Just compare Erdogan's picture with the PM of Uzbekistan's picture.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom