What's new

India Extends Development Hand

arp2041

BANNED
Joined
Apr 4, 2012
Messages
10,406
Reaction score
-9
Country
India
Location
India
As India continues to rise, Indian diplomacy is spreading its wings globally. It’s no secret that economic diplomacy is the engine that propels a country’s relations with its neighbors, the region and the rest of the world. The Indian case is no exception, and to manage its economic aid and assistance to friendly countries, New Delhi set up the Development Partnership Administration (DPA) in January of this year.

DPA is an effort within the External Affairs Ministry to streamline the delivery process of India’s partnership projects with developing countries. India’s development projects overseas have expanded considerably in recent years, both in sectoral terms and in geographic reach. Until about ten years ago, both the size and spread of such projects was very limited. Today, in contrast, India’s footprint extends as far as Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean.

Understandably, many of these projects are in India’s immediate neighborhood, namely South Asia, which accounts for about 70 percent of India’s total commitments under grant assistance. But India has also made it clear to beneficiaries of DPA that New Delhi doesn’t like to refer to itself as a donor, but a development partner. India responds to the development priorities communicated to it, and tailors its projects according to the recipient country’s wish list. India doesn’t impose conditions, whether political, economic or social, and the government claims that it isn’t prescriptive in the type of project that is selected for development cooperation.

The movers and shakers of Indian foreign policy have taken care to ensure that all projects under the DPA are based strictly on considerations of mutual benefit, so that they aren’t exploitative in nature. In this respect, the Indian developmental outreach program is arguably different from China’s, as the Chinese are increasingly being seen by developing countries as a merchant whose assistance comes with strings attached.

Some of the major projects that India is funding abroad under grant assistance include a housing project of 50,000 units that India is constructing in Sri Lanka, and a large transmission line project in Pul-e-Khumri, Afghanistan, which has already been completed and under budget.

An important arm of India’s developmental outreach abroad is through the Lines of Credit projects that are spread across the globe, particularly in Africa. To manage such projects, India has classified countries as heavily indebted poor countries, low-income countries and middle-income countries, based on World Bank classifications.

DPA is an effort to put together under one umbrella all aspects of project implementation, from conception to formulation, to monitoring implementation and impact assessment. The biggest share of assistance has generally gone to Bhutan as India is implementing a number of hydroelectric power projects there. Development assistance to Bhutan from April to December 2011 was Rs.869 crore (about $157 million). For the full year 2010-11, Indian developmental assistance to its immediate neighbors was Rs.167 crore for Nepal, Rs.90 crore for Sri Lanka, and Rs.74 crore for Burma.

India’s development partnership projects aren’t the preserve of any one ministry, but DPA functions under the External Affairs Ministry because the reality is that it’s not possible to separate the political relationship with a country from the economic projects that are being implemented there.

India Extends Development Hand | Indian Decade
 
.
I like that Indian diplomacy is evolving. I especially like these two snippets.

But India has also made it clear to beneficiaries of DPA that New Delhi doesn’t like to refer to itself as a donor, but a development partner. India responds to the development priorities communicated to it, and tailors its projects according to the recipient country’s wish list. India doesn’t impose conditions, whether political, economic or social, and the government claims that it isn’t prescriptive in the type of project that is selected for development cooperation.

The movers and shakers of Indian foreign policy have taken care to ensure that all projects under the DPA are based strictly on considerations of mutual benefit, so that they aren’t exploitative in nature.
 
. .
i said it before , i say it again . all hail the MEA. :)

they are one dept who actually make us proud.

sorry bro, MEA may be great but certainly no the minister, how the hell he got the position on the first place, 2 biggest blunders of him which i remember are:

1. Reading the Portugal speech at UNSC......:hitwall::hitwall:
2. Saying in the press conference that India has no direct border with Afghanistan.....:hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
.
sorry bro, MEA may be great but certainly no the minister, how the hell he got the position on the first place, 2 biggest blunders of him which i remember are:

1. Reading the Portugal speech at UNSC......:hitwall::hitwall:
2. Saying in the press conference that India has no direct border with Afghanistan.....:hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
Check your geography you will find what he has said to be correct.
 
.
i said it before , i say it again . all hail the MEA. :)

they are one dept who actually make us proud.
True sir....MEA is indeed one of the few departments who has done their job sincerely and brought us closer to many countries. Strategic, economic and political goals are attained according to country's need.
 
.
Check your geography you will find what he has said to be correct.

You don't have any idea of Indian govt. policy do you, India treats all of Kashmir as Indian right? So now you check your geography as Kashmir has a border with Afghanistan (very small though). What blunder he made was that he counted P.O.K as Part of Pakistan which is not the case.

If you still can't find check this out:

kashmir_rel_2003.jpg


P.S. next time pls get your facts right
 
.
You don't have any idea of Indian govt. policy, India treats all of Kashmir as Indian right? So now you check your geography as Kashmir has a border with Afghanistan. What blunder he made was that he counted P.O.K as Part of Pakistan which is not the case.
Ya I know that for all practical purposes we have no land link to A'stan.Hence the minister mentioned it.
 
.
Ya I know that for all practical purposes we have no land link to A'stan.Hence the minister mentioned it.

Dude he is the foreign minister of India practical or not how can he say this??? He intentionally or unintentionally agreed that P.O.K is part of Pakistan. Is this not a blunder???? can any minister in China say that we don't have any direct links to Assam (since Arunachal is with India)???
 
.
Dude he is the foreign minister of India practical or not how can he say this??? He intentionally or unintentionally agreed that P.O.K is part of Pakistan. Is this not a blunder???? can any minister in China say that we don't have any direct links to Assam (since Arunachal is with India)???

Let me put it this way P.O.K is out of bounds for Indian goods going to A'stan as much as we would like to have control overP.O.K we don't have control overP.O.K.
Simply put when we use the word P.O.K we imply we dont have access to that region as it is occupied by another country.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom