What's new

India did it all Eons Ago Cars, Stem Cell research & All that

Just a small tidbit do you know Sanskrit called earth Bhugol Bhu as in Bhumi , Gol as in Round ..



pimples o_O
Another one, don't know how true it is but in many rituals there is frequent mention of 9 planets and I believe they are in our rituals for quite some time. :what:
 
.
Another one, don't know how true it is but in many rituals there is frequent mention of 9 planets and I believe they are in our rituals for quite some time. :what:

In temples they are represented as Gods and Sun is in the centre, i see it in most temples though i don;t know how old the practice is ...
 
.
You say you are a man of science. I can excuse your ignorance in history. Though common sense would have taught you otherwise. It's like because Germans were defeated in WW2 means that they could 'never project any power'. :D Hilarious actually.
Pick up a history book and try to read it and not skim through it. After the Naploeonic wars, the Germans had more than broken the hegemony of France as a Global power for decades. That leading up to WWI was them projecting power when Germany and Russia picked separate sides. After Versailles, Hitler dismissing some of the major points of the treaty and rearming and increasing military projection in the face of French concerns was projecting power. The Greeks projected power and now they are bankrupt, doesn't mean the world credits them any less for their contributions to human development. You should seriously consider not being personal and add some substance to your post.

Anyway - coming to history. You perhaps may have heard about the resistance to Alexander.
Porus lost the war, Alexander returned as he lacked the manpower and his army was facing battle fatigue.
Geography saved us more than anything else.
Or heard about ibn Qasim. Are you aware that he succeeded on his 18th attempt? His 17 attempts were failures. The mighty Persian empire fell like a house of cards in comparison.
I have not read about Qasim losing 17 times. Please quote a source for this.
All of Europe was trembling in fear of the Moors - stretching from Tours to Vienna. The Vijaynagara Empire on the other hand continued to exist till the 16th century. And just after another century the Marathas ascended!
geography again. Charles Martel defeated the Moors. There was Reconquista. Al-andulas was a Muslim victory, Reconquista was Christian. What is your point?
Also please remember that insulting a Pakistani here is equivalent to insulting an Indian because we belong largely to a similar line. Panini for example would be Pakistani now. So would Taxila, Kambojas, etc.
huh!?
Bottomline: It's relative actually. You may find a hundred odd reasons to hate your ancestors, I will have a thousand to be proud of them (without being mutually exclusive). :)
ok. to each his own then. You can be emotional about it. I see no reason to give anything more credit than it deserves.
Pot calling kettle black :D
Such a clever usage of English idioms. Good show!

You are no different from the people who overfantasize ancient Indian culture.

yeah we share an overactive imagination. Thanks for pointing that out.
 
.
I did not find these in the book! :(


Exactly. All this Hindu and India's past makes me cringe. Without Mughals we would never have had a country. But for the British we would never have had education.

Just take a look at the Taj Mahal or the Parliament building itself. The ugly mandirs and destroyed Nalanda are a pathetic sight in comparison.

All these Hindus want is to take us back to the savage days of the Mahabharata :sick:


There were never anything called bharatiyas. There were Dravidians who were pushed back and butchered by Aryans who brought some semblance of civilization.

There is nothing to support anything, because Hindus/utvas are incapable of anything but chest thumping.


True. We are just copy cats. Even our agricultural tools are borrowed. And guess what - we did not improve that either. Before the Mughals and other Sultanates came what were we? Vagabonds and cave dwellers living on forest produce alone.
You have a lot of time at hand.

And let not the Hindutvas bring their vast array of Shastras (on practically every discipline including Society, War, Culture and even Sex) which they claim to speak about a social system. In fact they were compiled entirely by Persians and Europeans and all we did was print an old date and claim it to be dated to 1000BC :(

Do you in this day and age study anything from those shastras which are still available for discussion?
You study things like Pythagoras theorem, Archimedes principle, Aristotle's rhetoric. They are useful and applicable and make sense in this day and age as they will forever.
Even Ashoka did not have a social system in place - the pillars with his edicts were a fiction planted by the British to build a pan Indian identity. We never had any ancient Indian scientists, philosophers, etc till perhaps al Biruni. But wait he was Persian. :sarcastic:We did not even have a language until the Mughals invented Urdu. Before that what was here? Sign language that we claim to be Sanskrit. :bad: Oh wait, it is almost a dead language, being spoken in only two villages in India. Still the Fascist Hindus promote it as the ancient Indian language, while Pakistanis should have the sole legitmate claim on it.
Contribution to improve people's lives holds more water when you talk of evaluating a civilization/culture's true success.
you do know that a lot of contributions you wrote about had Buddhists behind them right?

You have perhaps made the first and only genuine hole in the argument. :tup: The previous naysayers were so ridiculous.

You are looking at it all wrong. Nobody's disrespecting anything. It just doesn't mane any sense believing in stories written eons ago.
 
.
You have a lot of time at hand.



Do you in this day and age study anything from those shastras which are still available for discussion?
You study things like Pythagoras theorem, Archimedes principle, Aristotle's rhetoric. They are useful and applicable and make sense in this day and age as they will forever.

Contribution to improve people's lives holds more water when you talk of evaluating a civilization/culture's true success.

you do know that a lot of contributions you wrote about had Buddhists behind them right?



You are looking at it all wrong. Nobody's disrespecting anything. It just doesn't mane any sense believing in stories written eons ago.
One word - duh. :coffee:
 
. .
@SarthakGanguly if sarcasm can prove the opposite, then I am the most stupid poster here, ban me.. :sarcastic:

to repeate what skull said, nobody is taking away achievements of vedic people, or greeks, or sumerians.. but to say we did it all already is really stupid.
BTW the skeptic mind of the same people kicks in if person of a rival civilization makes similar claims. :yes4:
It's not you. You are more balanced. I appreciate opinions from all extremes of the spectrum. But some are act more like sophisticated trolls. Skull is also correct.

Let me reiterate - Stem cell research etc--- ancient Indians most probably had no idea about it but if some loudmouth comes and claims with all his self righteousness that Indians had no history to be proud of, we are gonna have a problem. No silent majority here.

Plus - I appreciate your sarcasm at times. I do take potshots at you, but don't misunderstand that as not showing you respect. Joe Shearer must remember me, we have our differences, but I am willing to exchange opinions in a decent manner. Also when it comes to history I would any day learn from @Joe Shearer (even if it conflicts with my ideas) than others on this forum. :tup:


The Vaimanika Shastras themselves were written down (no ancient, original source) twenty years after Wright brothers achieved their historic success. By that time, already, WW-1 had given a massive impetus to manned flight and newer planes were constantly raising the bar. It isn't hence implausible to think that Mr Subbaraya Shastry, the author of this manuscript, could have got hold of rudimentary understanding of flight dynamics and decided to use the same in his work.
Vaimanik Shastra is a joke. God knows why the academics take it seriously. I mean it was created in the 20s more God's sake. As if adding the word Shastra makes it older.

You never leave an opportunity to showcase your heavy vocabulary. I take this opportunity to salute you good sir.
Ahh. Che thanking a space cat. :enjoy: Life is good.
 
. . .
This is one thing which makes me think ancient Indians were much more technologically advanced than us..
640px-QtubIronPillar.JPG


Another example is this (aranmula Kannadi)
IN26-ARANMULA_KANNADI_1815f.jpg


The problem with ancient Indians is that instead of writing it down, all the knowledge was shared to students through vocal.. I am not sure about aeroplane or hydrogen bomb but there were things our ancestors did which we should be very proud of..

Really,,,advanced than us based on a non rust iron pillar!!
:lol::lol:

Ya but find out what the nine are.

Number of planets is debatable now...........
 
. .
It doesn't even refer to the former nine. Which is why I asked that it be looked at.

This whole thread is a waste of time.................i think we still have little clue about nano tech,,,forget 4000 years ago:lol:
 
.
This whole thread is a waste of time.................i think we still have little clue about nano tech,,,forget 4000 years ago:lol:

We are a gullible people. A country that obsesses about (some supposed) achievements in the ancient past is normally not confident about the present or the future. If our people were super smart in the past & then simply forgot about their "inventions", that would put them high up in the list of the super stupid. There have always been exceptions but we must admit we haven't done much, certainly not for a very, very long time. Limiting the "thinking" to only a few people probably didn't help. Nor did caste based rules governing artisans etc. Innovation was discouraged, there was no real incentive. We screwed ourselves big time, wallowing in imagined past glory is pointless.
 
. .
This is one thing which makes me think ancient Indians were much more technologically advanced than us..
640px-QtubIronPillar.JPG


Another example is this (aranmula Kannadi)
IN26-ARANMULA_KANNADI_1815f.jpg


The problem with ancient Indians is that instead of writing it down, all the knowledge was shared to students through vocal.. I am not sure about aeroplane or hydrogen bomb but there were things our ancestors did which we should be very proud of..

There had been many such metallurgy technology, which has lost with the time. Some being Viking sword making technique, peruvian metallurgy and stuffs. That doesn't give them an upper hand in technology, Vikings didn't had any such advanced way of living.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom