India, China must have strategic partnership: expert

[Adnan Faruqi]

Converting current LAC to IB.. India giving up clain on Aksai Chin & China giving up claim on Tawang..

Strategically China wanted keep the Tawang (South Tibet) issue alive for Nehru hosting the Tibetan Govt in excile. Other-wise, it does not serve them any other purpose. On the other hand, Aksai Chin is of far more importance to them..

Similarly, We have patriotic people living in Tawang, while Aksai Chin is just some baren land.

So it makes sense to both the parties.

Only thorn here is the Tibetan govt in excile residing in India. DL, as a religious leader would have been fine, but as a head of the exiled Tibetan Govt, will never go well with China. Just for a moment think how India would have reacted if China had hosted the Kashmir govt in exile, or Assam govt in exile.. It's the same thing..

^^^^^^^^ this type + Nehru type of thinking is root cause of problem.

We need to deal with the china, there can not be two tigers in a mountain (a chinese proverb) ek mayan main do talwaren nahi reh sakti (Indian one)

We have to learn to live with it defending each of our military, strategic, economic, political interests.

- Aksai chin is not barren land , that's our Madrewatan (motherland). Only a fool can deny its importance ITS THE CHINA'S ONLY LAND LINK WITH PAKISTAN.

 

[Polemos]

Converting current LAC to IB.. India giving up clain on Aksai Chin & China giving up claim on Tawang..

Strategically China wanted keep the Tawang (South Tibet) issue alive for Nehru hosting the Tibetan Govt in excile. Other-wise, it does not serve them any other purpose. On the other hand, Aksai Chin is of far more importance to them..

Similarly, We have patriotic people living in Tawang, while Aksai Chin is just some baren land.

So it makes sense to both the parties.

Only thorn here is the Tibetan govt in excile residing in India. DL, as a religious leader would have been fine, but as a head of the exiled Tibetan Govt, will never go well with China. Just for a moment think how India would have reacted if China had hosted the Kashmir govt in exile, or Assam govt in exile.. It's the same thing..

Gr8 post and makes good sense. This is a political minefield for India. Which PM would preside over the giving up of Aksai Chin? He would be savaged by the opposition for selling out the country.

 

[Martian2]

You're right. Almost all of Arunachal is being included in China's claim..

Split South Tibet/Arunachal Pradesh roughly in half. China gets Tawang and the areas occupied by Tibetans (i.e. Chinese people or Mongoloids). India gets the other half that is not occupied by Mongoloids.

That's it folks. I've solved the Sino-Indian border problem in 5 minutes. Of course, it'll never happen. Indian politicians won't budge an inch.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Split South Tibet/Arunachal Pradesh roughly in half. China gets Tawang and the areas occupied by Tibetans (i.e. Chinese people or Mongoloids). India gets the other half that is not occupied by Mongoloids.

That's it folks. I've solved the Sino-Indian border problem in 5 minutes. Of course, it'll never happen. Indian politicians won't budge an inch.

split iok in 2 parts we get the muslim kashmiris they get the hindu pandits in jammu.

 

[Kazhugu]

Split South Tibet/Arunachal Pradesh roughly in half. China gets Tawang and the areas occupied by Tibetans (i.e. Chinese people or Mongoloids). India gets the other half that is not occupied by Mongoloids.

That's it folks. I've solved the Sino-Indian border problem in 5 minutes. Of course, it'll never happen. Indian politicians won't budge an inch.

Splitting one square km from indian territory is unconstitutional let alone splitting half of a state...or another deal...lets exchange tawang for aksai chin.....

there i have solved the issue in 1 minute...lets see if cpc budges for that solution..

---------- Post added at 02:43 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:42 AM ----------

split iok in 2 parts we get the muslim kashmiris they get the hindu pandits in jammu.

u can take the muslim kashmiries even now....india's only concern is the land.....

 

[Martian2]

Splitting one square km from indian territory is unconstitutional let alone splitting half of a state...or another deal...lets exchange tawang for aksai chin.....

When two peoples cannot agree on a compromise, there is an age-old solution to the problem. War. We will see you on the battlefield to settle this.

Chinese Type 98 Main Battle Tank

 

[Kazhugu]

When two peoples cannot agree on a compromise, there is an age-old solution to the problem. War. We will see you on the battlefield to settle this.

Chinese Type 98 Main Battle Tank

war will not solve anything when we both have this...

 

[huzihaidao12]

When two peoples cannot agree on a compromise, there is an age-old solution to the problem. War. We will see you on the battlefield to settle this.

Martian2, brother, it is not necessary, I think the Chinese and Indian leaders will be wise enough.

By the way, frankly, brothers, if the majority of Taiwan people like you, I will be more patient for peaceful reunification.

 

[Martian2]

war will not solve anything when we both have this...

India's puny atomic weaponry comprises a total of 0.8 to 1 megaton. Fire one atomic warhead in China's direction and your civilization is over. China has at least 294 megatons of thermonuclear firepower.

The next Sino-Indian war will be fought with Chinese cruise missiles, short-range ballistic missiles (SRBMs), and multiple-launch rocket systems (MLRS; 200 to 400km range). See excellent video below.

----------

Martian2, brother, it is not necessary, I think the Chinese and Indian leaders will be wise enough.

By the way, frankly, brothers, if the majority of Taiwan people like you, I will be more patient for peaceful reunification.

I was raised in a KMT household. I think my views are fairly representative of many KMT households.

 

[Killswitch]

I got a solution too!

If you want our land come and fight for it.

 

[Holmes]

War would be an ugly way to solve to border issue.

 

[chanikya]

@ martin2

Hello because of this attitude only now your country is eating mud. We China and India are not like you, You want us to fight so that you can take the bread. We are not fools like you. Mr. Fool.

 

[chanikya]

India's puny atomic weaponry comprises a total of 0.8 to 1 megaton. Fire one atomic warhead in China's direction and your civilization is over. China has at least 294 megatons of thermonuclear firepower.

The next Sino-Indian war will be fought with Chinese cruise missiles, short-range ballistic missiles (SRBMs), and multiple-launch rocket systems (MLRS; 200 to 400km range). See excellent video below.

----------



I was raised in a KMT household. I think my views are fairly representative of many KMT households.

Everybody has these toys to play.

 

[hembo]

You may underestimate the significance of the Tibetan exiles, as long as we do not solve this problem, China has reason to doubt that India is still in the spy Tibet, then, any solution will have no meaning, all our relations will be stagnant, if the two sides continued to increase distrust and even the outbreak of a mine in the future.

I think you have mis-understood him. What he had said is that, it was a bad decision by Nehru to host that Tibetan govt in exile. But, as we are a democracy, requiring popular votes to form govt, our govts after govt are afraid to shut their shop.

Its like a bad tablet, which is difficult to throw away (keep hosting the Tibetan govt) or to swallow (keep hosting it)..

This cannot be achieved overnight unlike CPC. Here, the successive govts has to build up public consensus over time in order to get it done. Then also, their will be some fraction who will viciously oppose it & protests & strikes will follow..

Anyway, it (ceasing to host the govt in exile) needs to be done if we have to move forward in the path of development & prosperity...

Other-wise there will always be some trigger happy & short sighted pseudo-patriots on both sides.. One wrong move & we both can say good bye to peace & development for next 100 years..

 

[Killswitch]

China is a strategic competitor.


There is no friendship to be had as of yet.