What's new

India, China gang up against non-committal rich nations in Doha climate tal

LOVETOALL

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Oct 18, 2012
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
DOHA: On the first day of climate change talks here, India joined hands with China and other developing countries, including the small island states and the least developed countries (LDCs), to put rich countries on the mat for their lack of appetite to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The influential green NGOs too joined in to demand greater commitment from the developed world.

The like-minded developing countries — a new formation of 15-20 nations anchored by India and China — said, "Our work in Doha must ensure that Annex I parties (developed countries that are part of Kyoto Protocol) take on ambitious and legally binding mitigation commitments under the Kyoto Protocol." They linked the emission reduction obligations that developed countries such as the European Union (EU) take under the protocol to future of the new post-2020 global regime slated to be negotiated by 2015.

The BASIC group — India, China, Brazil and South Africa — spoke in one voice, "We strongly believe that the Kyoto Protocol remains the key component and cornerstone of the international climate regime and that the adoption of its second commitment period through a ratifiable amendment implemented from January 1, 2013, is the most important priority and the key deliverable for Doha."

Too often in the previous couple of years the small island developing countries and LDCs have cozied up to the EU. But they too mounted pressure on the developed world to do more.

"The commitments proposed by those parties ready to join a second commitment period are roughly consistent with an aggregate 20% reduction below 1990 levels by 2020. So this ambition must be urgently increased, and the time for this increase is here in Doha," said the Association of Small Island States at the launch of Doha talks.

The US came under attack by Gambia, who spoke on behalf of the LDCs, with the African nation singling out the biggest historical emitter. "We also hope that the year with a monster storm and scorching heat waves, as well as the re-elected leadership will lead the US to be more active and will no longer be a disinterested bystander in this process," Gambia hit out in a rare outburst of nations singling out others by name in such international diplomatic wars.

The green NGOs chimed in. The Climate Action Network, one of the largest grouping of climate NGOs, said, "Not only should developed countries sign on to second commitment period of the world's only legally binding climate treaty, the Kyoto Protocol, but for the nations involved to increase their emission reductions within the treaty and to close the loopholes that existed within it which would let 30 billion tonnes of carbon escape into the atmosphere."

Third World Network (TWN), an influential southern voice in the civil society, also linked the appetite EU and other developed countries show to take action to the future of the new global deal. "Whether Doha will result in an ambitious and legally binding Kyoto Protocol-2 remains to be seen and expectations are not very optimistic. An un-ambitious and weak outcome under the Kyoto Protocol will indeed have ramifications for the work of (the other tracks of negotiations)," said TWN.

Even as the US refused pointblank here to increase its emission reduction targets the EU fudged its way, linking higher obligations to yet more action by the developing world and partly suggesting economic realities could shape the decisions. "We are ready to step up our ambition from 20 to 30 per cent if the other major economies will also move up to the higher end of the pledges. This offer is still on the table and will stay on the table even after Doha," said the EU.

"We want a ratifiable amendment which makes way for ambition to increase during the commitment period," the EU added.

India, China gang up against non-committal rich nations in Doha climate talks - The Times of India
 
.
Dont China and India also share a huge impact on pollution?
 
.
yes they does. But it's still way below then developed country by per capita basis. china and India have huge population and not as rich as USA so asking them to reduce the carbon emission as par USA is something out of my logic.
 
.
Gang up ?

Thats an extreme way of putting it across
 
.
Dont China and India also share a huge impact on pollution?

Yes they do. But out together, their total emissions is less than what EU and US emit. Problem here is that the developed nations have been pushing India and China which are facing a industrial boom to focus on emission cuts without actually implementing such cuts in their own countries. It's more of a political game where they do not want additional pressure on their industries while they reel under recession, but it's clear double talk.
 
.
Gang up ?

Thats an extreme way of putting it across
Thats a TOI piece. No wonder they need lessons on vocabulary. The guy must have been thinking all along that 'ganging up' will sound like 'joined hands' but only cooler.
 
.
Thats a TOI piece. No wonder they need lessons on vocabulary. The guy must have been thinking all along that 'ganging up' will sound like 'joined hands' but only cooler.

Besides being TOI, the verbiage being used by newspapers in S Asia is very sensationalistic .

Its quite like India TV - looking for ' Breaking News' and Stop Press type hype in everything.

Everyone wants to project that the skies are about to fall down.
 
.
Besides being TOI, the verbiage being used by newspapers in S Asia is very sensationalistic .

Its quite like India TV - looking for ' Breaking News' and Stop Press type hype in everything.

Everyone wants to project that the skies are about to fall down.

Sensationalism is not the problem. The news piece sounds more like the rich nations are ganging up to avoid responsibility. This could have made a news and made sense. Besides China and India joining hands for anything is itself a big deal in the current situation. The guy clearly did not know the sense in which 'ganging up' is used and the editors let it fly.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom