India backs off after frenzied war rhetoric

[Sheikh Rauf]

Who told this Just Yesterday Pm had Meet with all Tri services Heads they Planning big
We have large window opportunities Pakistan is not Some super power they have Large Securities Issues And We will exploit that gaps now

Soft Diplomacy With pakistan is over I can tell you this much

telling people things about the region where you dont even exist ... tell me about it.

Do you want me to show you the number of times your govt fooled you?
Heck! There was a time in your country when elections were won by making anti-India speeches alone.
You know what?
We trust our PM and that's why he and his party managed the first parliamentary majority (by a party) since 1984.
3 decades!!!

By declaring that he wants Pakistanis to rise against certain "institutions" which have been hand in glove with terrorists, he has cleared the air- India is not going on a war with Pakistan. We don't want to kill innocents.
Expect Covert ops and psyops.
Yep!

Oh lavina ah lavina!
ho gaya mushkil mera jeena.

you indians are just about talking.Big mouth, fantasy mostly cuz of bollywood..saying dont wanna kill innocent, ignoring fully Kashmir,
we will do this and that but not attacking after so much drama.
All you guys can do is terrorist activities by involving Afg and using Bangladesh..
now Pak will match each and every bullet or blast.

 

[Grevion]

Tom and Jerry cartoon sent a clear message that if you're smarter than your opponent and then his size doesn't matter.

Smarter??
I would say jerry was luckier.

The above pics proves that.

 

[coffee_cup]

You know what?
We trust our PM and that's why he and his party managed the first parliamentary majority (by a party) since 1984.
3 decades!!!

By declaring that he wants Pakistanis to rise against certain "institutions" which have been hand in glove with terrorists, he has cleared the air- India is not going on a war with Pakistan. We don't want to kill innocents.
Expect Covert ops and psyops.
Yep!

You can keep your mad loudspeaker Modi as PM forever, we don't give a tiny rats a$$, tbh.

It is becoming insanely irritating to hear this loudspeaker making all those annoying noises and not biting.

Either he should do something or shut up forever.

India's "covert" ops or what the world calls "support for cross-border terrorism", killing thousands of civilians, is well known and not a new strategy as you would like us believe.

Now try something different. By supporting terrorism, India might have some tactical gains, but she will gain nothing of strategic nature.

 

[newb3e]

@waz @WAJsal
Kindly take a look at the thread title.

Isolate thread opener label him rougue do some randi roona infront of admin thats what you hindu-satani do cry cry cry!

Cowards!

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

The moment they see PAF F-16 's in an aggressive mood they start thinking we have worked up our nation for war what do we do now. They had the numbers in 65 and 71 too but our airforce beat them to pulp .

Their fighter jets servicibility is bad and 50 % of them are not available for operation according to their own media.

While according yesterday on Zee news one of their analysts said their army is low on ammunition and is not a good time to go to war with Pakistan .

As for courage well its a well known fact around the world that India as a nation punches much below its weight. They did chestbeating in 2001 and 2008 only to run back .

I have this issue - is India ready to take huge casualties (>>17) to undermine Pak??? They can burn lots of $$ on proxies and cause harm to Pak - that's for sure - but, is it enough to be a big power??

 

[Rafael]

NO Not at all ; Next Month we Have ELEVEN heads of States coming to INDIA

1 BRICS Meeting in GOA

2 BIMSTEC Meetings

3 India Russia Annual Summit

And Let them sweat about what is coming

The LOC has become alive again ; that is in our favour

Because LOC has thousands of soldiers ; we can hurt the enemy

We have given full freedom to the Army for LOC battles

The idea is to inflict maximum casualties on the enemy with Deniability

Please stop it will you? Dont you get embarassed by posting this nonsense and proven wrong everytime?

 

[el che]

Why go for war while there is other option which is more effective and devastating. Petitions are being filed for revision and abrogation of the Indus Water Treaty. A never seen before wave for the revision of the treaty is in Indian media. PM is being briefed about the treaty. A first in 50 years which has survived 3 wars. India has two options 1) Revoke the treaty 2) Use the waters for irrigation and power generation within the guidelines like for irrigation more run of the river projects. Both are deadly and slow poison. Killing the Pakistani economy and causing social unrest.

India should keep silent and pursue the diversion and blockade of waters. It will take time to develop the canals to divert the water. Long term vision is necessary than a short sighted hype and chest thumping.

 

[T-Rex]

Indians should not forget that many of their rivers flow from China. You reap what you sow, therefore, think twice before blocking the rivers flowing into Pakistan. Pakistan is no BD, there will be an ugly response, take my word for it.

 

[third eye]

there will be an ugly response, take my word for it.

Is it possible thats what India is looking for ?.. a sort of trigger where India is not the initiator ?

 

[T-Rex]

Is it possible thats what India is looking for ?.. a sort of trigger where India is not the initiator ?

Yes I was thinking about that possibility but there are arguments to counter that kind of statement. Besides there are plenty of things Pakistan can do that will initiate response from india.

 

[Baby-5]

India backs off after frenzied war rhetoric
Sunday September 25, 2016

NEW DELHI: After a week of hysterical war mongering by Indian officialdom, the realisation seems to have sunk in that military adventurism against Pakistan is not an option as it would have catastrophic consequences not just for the two countries but for the entire region.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who had been conferring with his top military commanders to look into the possibility of overt or covert military strikes in Pakistan, apparently backed down on Saturday when he talked about isolating Pakistan diplomatically.

New Delhi blamed Pakistan for the September 18 deadly attack on a military base near the Line of Control in Indian occupied Kashmir based on flimsy evidence, the authenticity of which is being questioned by some circles within India even.

Modi threatens to ‘isolate’ Pakistan globally

On Saturday, Islamabad called for an international investigation into the attack in Uri sector in which 18 Indian soldiers were killed.

The Indian media went into overdrive to create war hysteria in the country. But on Saturday, Modi sought to calm his right-wing supporters who have been clamouring for a muscular response to Islamabad, saying his government would continue its push to make Pakistan a pariah state in the eyes of the international community.

Addressing a Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) rally in Kerala, Modi threatened that India would intensify its efforts and force Pakistan ‘to be alone all over the world’. “We will leave no stone unturned to isolate Pakistan in the world,” he told the gathering of his hardline supporters.

The threat was the latest in the war of words Delhi has engaged in with Islamabad over unrest in IOK, where more than 100 Kashmiri civilians have been killed and thousands more wounded, including hundreds blinded, by Indian security forces firing live rounds and shotgun pellets at rock-throwing protesters.

Indian army moves heavy artillery guns along LoC

Stepping back from his previous belligerence, the Indian premier instead resorted to petty taunts in his speech. “India is ready for a war but let us fight a war on poverty, unemployment, and let’s see who wins first, India or Pakistan,” he said.

Modi also claimed that the Indian army had foiled 17 infiltration attempts across the border, killing 110 ‘fidayeen terrorists’ in the last few months.

Pakistan demands ‘international’ probe

Rejecting Delhi’s accusation that Islamabad was somehow involved in the Uri assault, Prime Minister’s Adviser on Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz on Saturday demanded an ‘international probe’ into the deadly attack.

“It is deplorable that India always chooses to blame Pakistan for any incident even prior to conducting a proper investigation. The statement is part of a pattern to mislead the world opinion and to cover up India’s reign of terror in IOK,” Aziz told BBC Urdu. “We demand that a probe, led by neutral, international bodies, be carried out into the incident that should be free of any bias.”

“At present, a liberation movement is ongoing in IOK,” he said, adding that “such attacks would dent the movement in Kashmir and Pakistan’s cause”.

Only 22% Indians endorse Modi’s Pakistan approach

Aziz contended that the allegations were a “blatant attempt on India’s part to deflect attention from the fast deteriorating humanitarian and human rights situation” in Kashmir since the killing of young separatist leader Burhan Wani by Indian troops.

“This is not the first time that India did this [ie, blamed Pakistan]. During a visit by the then US president, Bill Clinton, to India, IOK was rattled by a similar big event and India, as usual, laid the blame at Pakistan’s doorstep. Later, it turned out that India had staged the incident just to malign Pakistan.”

He said it was impossible to stage a cross-border attack in such a heavily-fortified area, adding that despite dilly-dallying tactics of India in providing ‘solid evidence’ after the Mumbai and Pathankot attacks, “Pakistan was ready to assist in the Uri attack probe.”

India backs off after frenzied war rhetoric

I dont think India gave any war threats officially. I seems you are guys are too scared of our news channels. so.

Smarter??
I would say jerry was luckier.

The above pics proves that.

very Nostalgic post.

 

[Levina]

India's "covert" ops or what the world calls "support for cross-border terrorism", killing thousands of civilians, is well known and not a new strategy as you would like us believe

Haha
Didn't know you were brainwashed to this extent.

By supporting terrorism, India might have some tactical gains, but she will gain nothing of strategic nature.

Let me tell you, definition of terrorism varies from country to country.
To Russia those who are fighting against Syrian govt are terrorists but to America they are rebels.
To India, Burhan Wani was a terrorist but to you he was a mere rebel. Lol

 

[coffee_cup]

Haha
Didn't know you were brainwashed to this extent.

Ok, hate to do it again but...

Mukti Bahini, LTTE, BLA, TTP.

Haven't you people learned enough that India's financing/training/arming of terrorist proxies to attack school, hospitals, churches, mosques, buses, funerals in the neighboring countries is the very core reason this region is on fire in the first place?

And you still want more..., "covert operations" my §$%...

 

[Levina]

Ok, hate to do it again but...

Mukti Bahini, LTTE, BLA, TTP.

Haven't you people learned enough that India's financing/training/arming of terrorist proxies to attack school, hospitals, churches, mosques, buses, funerals in the neighboring countries is the very core reason this region is on fire in the first place?

And you still want more..., "covert operations" my §$%...

An ideal case of pot calling kettle black.

Man you're funny.

 

[coffee_cup]

An ideal case of pot calling kettle black.

Man you're funny.

That is exactly what India has been doing: Playing victim and at the same time actively supporting terrorism in the neighborhood for more than half a century.

Go check your facts...