What's new

India and NSG-News, Updates and Discussions.

China said no, that's all that matters. You can have a thousand countries supporting you but the only thing that matters is China's opinion. Basically, RIP to india's nsg bid.
 
Quit dreaming my indian brothers.
Because of our dreams we have reached where we are today,we may not have reached yet where we wanted to be,but we will reach there all because our dreams.

And you too are where you are because of your dreams for the future or should we say lack of it .
 
No entry in NSG: India blames one country (China), others said no too

IN A major setback, India’s ambitious bid to become a member of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) failed on Friday, as China and at least seven other countries blocked consensus at the elite group which controls transfer of nuclear technology in the world. The NSG cited Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) as the “cornerstone” of the international non-proliferation regime, but India said the NPT issue had been addressed in 2008 itself, when it got the country-specific waiver.

The Indian Express has learnt that Mexico also pressed for a “criteria-based process” for allowing non-NPT members into the NSG, along with Switzerland, Brazil and Turkey. What has surprised many in New Delhi is Mexico and Switzerland’s stand since both countries had promised support during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit a few weeks ago. Brazil was also a surprise since India counted it in its “support column” as both countries have shared interests in climate change and energy needs and are part of groupings like IBSA and BRICS.

Turkey was the only country to push for clubbing both India and Pakistan’s applications directly, while Pakistan’s application was not discussed at all.

Leading the naysayers was China, along with three countries which have strong positions on nuclear non-proliferation — Ireland, Austria and New Zealand. While Modi visited Ireland last year to solicit its support, President Pranab Mukherjee sought New Zealand’s support during his visit last month. Modi also met Chinese President Xi Jinping in Tashkent on Thursday, where he asked him to “contribute to the evolving consensus”.

However, sources told The Indian Express that the NSG plenary in Seoul concluded with the possibility of a “special plenary” — likely in November this year — to discuss the issues related to entry of non-NPT members into the elite 48-nation group.

Reiterating their primacy to the NPT, the NSG plenary in Seoul, in its public statement on Friday, said the “participating governments reiterated their firm support for the full, complete and effective implementation of the NPT as the cornerstone of the international non-proliferation regime.”

It said “the NSG had discussions on the issue of technical, legal and political aspects of the participation of non-NPT states in the NSG and decided to continue its discussion”, indicating the possibility of “informal consultations” followed by a special plenary later this year.

A disappointed New Delhi, which invested considerable amount of political capital on the bid and was seen to have underestimated the opposition, singled out “one country” which, it said, raised hurdles persistently — an oblique reference to China. This kind of finger-pointing is considered rather unusual in diplomatic statements made by countries.

“We understand that despite procedural hurdles persistently raised by one country, a three-hour-long discussion took place last night on the issue of future participation in the NSG. An overwhelming number of those who took the floor supported India’s membership and appraised India’s application positively. We thank each and every one of them. It is also our understanding that the broad sentiment was to take this matter forward,” the Ministry of External Affairs’ official spokesperson, Vikas Swarup, said in Tashkent, where he was accompanying the Prime Minister for the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit.

New Delhi tried to downplay the countries which raised issues of criteria-based process. “It is also our understanding that most countries want an early decision. A few countries raised issues regarding the process for India’s participation in the NSG. It is self-evident that process issues would not arise if these countries were actually opposed to our participation. This is corroborated by our own bilateral engagement with each of these countries,” said Swarup.

“The NSG concluded its plenary meeting in Seoul today (June 24). India was of course not in the room. But we understand from our friends and well-wishers that discussions on expansion of membership, or what is called “participation” in NSG, were certainly not hypothetical,” he said.

He stressed that though India made its application for membership on May 12, it had begun its engagement with the NSG in 2004. “It has been suggested that India’s participation in the NSG requires it to join the NPT. Our stand on the NPT is well known. But let me underline that in September 2008, the NSG itself addressed this issue. Paragraph 1 (a) of the September 2008 decision states that the decision on India contributes to the ‘widest possible implementation of the provisions and objectives of the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons’. There is thus no contradiction between the NPT and India’s closer engagement with the NSG,” said the MEA spokesperson.

While New Delhi said that an early decision on its application remains in larger global interest and India’s participation in the NSG will further strengthen nuclear non-proliferation and make global nuclear commerce more secure, China had a different take.

The Chinese chief negotiator at the NSG told reporters in Seoul that the group would not bend the rules and allow India membership as it had not signed the NPT. “Applicant countries must be signatories of the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons,” Wang Qun, the head of arms control department in China’s foreign ministry, was quoted as saying by Reuters in Seoul.

“This is a pillar, not something that China set. It is universally recognised by the international community,” said Wang according to a statement released by the Chinese foreign ministry on Friday.

“International rules will have to be respected, big or small,” Wang told Reuters. “Big like NPT. Small like the rules and procedures of this group… The important question of which we are concerned, is how to deal with the question of participation of countries within the group of non-NPT states. It’s a formidable task,” he said.

http://indianexpress.com/article/in...one-country-china-others-said-no-too-2874377/
 
Last edited:
I don't understand why India refused to sign the damn NTP, and instead, asks every member country of NSG to bend the rules for it? Anything so special about India?
 
That's the whole point, China and India are not friends.
Ok let me rephrase it,china has been doing all the things to hurt India for decadesnow,helping pakiatan with nuclear tech and missile tech,has India done anything like that with china.
 
In 1974 Z A Bhutto PM of Pakistan asked Bulent Ecevit if he need Pakistan armed forced for back up during Cyprus invasion. Bhutto also ordered Pak armed forces ready for mobilization, if situation get worst for Turkey.

During 1971 stand off between Pak-India . Angry Chairman Mao ordered full mobilization of Chinese army to help Pakistan . Historian writes, China was very angry at US attitude toward Pakistan during 71.( its long debate, just writing in short).

China didn't do squat in 1971. At least US sent it's naval fleet.

The creation of bangladesh was sealed on the14th of August 1947. It was inevitable. It doesn't matter if it happened in 1971, 1981, 1991, 2001 or 2011 for that matter. YOU CANNOT form a nation of 2 different land masses separated by 1000s of kms where the 2 peoples differ in terms of genetics, race, heritage, culture and way of life. It's impossible. This is precisely the reason why Pakistan was created. India took advantage of this fact in 1971. Nothing more, nothing less.

A very stupid argument. Your military/civil leaders proselytized this theory among many to rationalize the outcome.

You know which country has the longest border with France ? Please guess...
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
..
.

It's Brazil. FACT. Go figure.

@Vauban Did you know that ? :D
 
Ok let me rephrase it,china has been doing all the things to hurt India for decadesnow,helping pakiatan with nuclear tech and missile tech,has India done anything like that with china.

You mean apart from hosting our largest separatist group in 1959 and then starting a war with us in 1962 while we were in the middle of our worst ever famine?

China and Pakistan only became close a long time after that.
 
You mean apart from hosting our largest separatist group in 1959 and then starting a war with us in 1962 while we were in the middle of our worst ever famine?

I'm sorry, did China make this famine known to the outside world while it was happening?

Mao made sure to keep exporting grain to the outside world while gleefully seeing millions of his country men resort to cannibalism and then starve to death....how was anyone supposed to know about it?
 
Quit dreaming my indian brothers.
05_A.-P.-J.-Abdul-Kalam-quotes-2.jpg
 
The fact that India thought China is the only obstacle it has to overwhelm to get into the group, while the reality was many countries opposed it, meant that India's diplomats and journalists have live in different reality than the rest of the world. No wonder the bid failed.

To be honest, I would love to see India AND Pakistan get into the group, albeit by signing the NPT. The last thing we need is nuke weapon falling into the hand of more players.
 
I don't understand why India refused to sign the damn NTP, and instead, asks every member country of NSG to bend the rules for it? Anything so special about India?
NSG was formed after Indian atomic tests,not after other countries conducted their tests that includes china too.
Now the same group atleast the majority wants India in NSG,wont you think thats special.or China being in the group still wont get some of the tech from other members in NSG what India will get even being out of NSG,isnt that special bro.
 
Back
Top Bottom