What's new

India among most dangerous places in the world

Foo_Fighter

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
981
Reaction score
-1
NEW DELHI: You are more likely to die in a bomb blast in India than in Afghanistan. Strange as it may sound, government data show that India is among the most dangerous places in the world as far as bomb blasts per year are concerned - next only to Iraq and Pakistan, with even war-torn Afghanistan and Syria doing better.

.jpg

Latest data from National Bomb Data Centre (NBDC) show that India suffered 212 bomb blasts in 2013 - more than double of what Afghanistan (with 108 blasts) suffered.


Latest data from National Bomb Data Centre (NBDC) show that India suffered 212 bomb blasts in 2013 — more than double of what Afghanistan (with 108 blasts) suffered. Facing internal strife, Bangladesh with 75 blasts and Syria with 36 blasts have done better.

While the number of blasts in India decreased from 241 in 2012 to 212 in 2013, casualties went up with 130 deaths and 466 injuries last year as compared to 113 deaths and 419 injuries in 2012.

Analyzing the frequency of IED blasts in the country over the past decade, the document says between 2004 and 2013 "there have been an average of 298 blasts and 1,337 casualties in India". This is again higher than Afghanistan which in the past five years witnessed a maximum of 209 such attacks in 2010, according to the data.

In fact, along with Pakistan and Iraq, India accounts for almost 75% of bomb blasts in the world. However, India has done slightly better than the rest of the world in terms of the share of attacks targeted at common public. While in the rest of the world, 69% of attacks are directed towards public, India registered 58% in this category with the rest being targeted at the security forces and government property.

31357851.cms


But even these figures could change. While security forces managed to decrease attacks on them by almost 40% last years as compared to 2012, attacks on public remained almost the same. "This is due to improved drills and alertness of security forces. A similar alertness and training is not there with the people," said an officer of the security establishment.

An analysis of the attacks in India shows that its North East region (Assam and Manipur worst affected) and Maoist areas (Bihar, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand registering most blasts) have contributed to over 80% of IED attacks even though Jammu and Kashmir witnessed a 50% rise in bomb blasts last year as compared to2012.

Among states Jammu and Kashmir, Jharkhand, Meghalaya, West Bengal, Nagaland and Karnataka have all witnessed a spurt in terror attacks through blasts while 15 other states including Manipur, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Assam, Tamil Nadu and Odisha witnessed a declining trend.

(Source: National Bomb Data Centre)
India among most dangerous places in the world - The Times of India
 
2nd thread on same topic today. Guys atleast do some research before posting.
 
we seldon see blasts in urban areas........

the blasts are often done by maoists targetting the crpf forces
 
NEW DELHI: You are more likely to die in a bomb blast in India than in Afghanistan. Strange as it may sound, government data show that India is among the most dangerous places in the world as far as bomb blasts per year are concerned - next only to Iraq and Pakistan, with even war-torn Afghanistan and Syria doing better.

.jpg

Latest data from National Bomb Data Centre (NBDC) show that India suffered 212 bomb blasts in 2013 - more than double of what Afghanistan (with 108 blasts) suffered.


Latest data from National Bomb Data Centre (NBDC) show that India suffered 212 bomb blasts in 2013 — more than double of what Afghanistan (with 108 blasts) suffered. Facing internal strife, Bangladesh with 75 blasts and Syria with 36 blasts have done better.

While the number of blasts in India decreased from 241 in 2012 to 212 in 2013, casualties went up with 130 deaths and 466 injuries last year as compared to 113 deaths and 419 injuries in 2012.

Analyzing the frequency of IED blasts in the country over the past decade, the document says between 2004 and 2013 "there have been an average of 298 blasts and 1,337 casualties in India". This is again higher than Afghanistan which in the past five years witnessed a maximum of 209 such attacks in 2010, according to the data.

In fact, along with Pakistan and Iraq, India accounts for almost 75% of bomb blasts in the world. However, India has done slightly better than the rest of the world in terms of the share of attacks targeted at common public. While in the rest of the world, 69% of attacks are directed towards public, India registered 58% in this category with the rest being targeted at the security forces and government property.

31357851.cms


But even these figures could change. While security forces managed to decrease attacks on them by almost 40% last years as compared to 2012, attacks on public remained almost the same. "This is due to improved drills and alertness of security forces. A similar alertness and training is not there with the people," said an officer of the security establishment.

An analysis of the attacks in India shows that its North East region (Assam and Manipur worst affected) and Maoist areas (Bihar, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand registering most blasts) have contributed to over 80% of IED attacks even though Jammu and Kashmir witnessed a 50% rise in bomb blasts last year as compared to2012.

Among states Jammu and Kashmir, Jharkhand, Meghalaya, West Bengal, Nagaland and Karnataka have all witnessed a spurt in terror attacks through blasts while 15 other states including Manipur, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Assam, Tamil Nadu and Odisha witnessed a declining trend.

(Source: National Bomb Data Centre)
India among most dangerous places in the world - The Times of India
LOL...were they counting ..DIWALI celebration too....:D:D
 
who doesnt know that its mostly the border areas which are unsafe in India.And most of the attack is not on civilians
i hope this was not missed :coffee:
India registered 58% in this category with the rest being targeted at the security forces and government property.
 
Agree with the report/survey..India is surely the most dangerous place in the world.
 
NEW DELHI: You are more likely to die in a bomb blast in India than in Afghanistan. Strange as it may sound, government data show that India is among the most dangerous places in the world as far as bomb blasts per year are concerned - next only to Iraq and Pakistan, with even war-torn Afghanistan and Syria doing better.

The scale of the bomb blasts in Afghanistan are significantly larger than the ones in India.

Both in terms of blast energy and human casualties.
 
NEW DELHI: You are more likely to die in a bomb blast in India than in Afghanistan.

How so?
India has over 40x the population of Afghanistan but 2x the bomb blasts.

So, the probability of dying in a bomb blast is 20x higher in Afghanistan than in India.

Per capita, dear Watson, per capita...
 
How so?
India has over 40x the population of Afghanistan but 2x the bomb blasts.

So, the probability of dying in a bomb blast is 20x higher in Afghanistan than in India.

Per capita, dear Watson, per capita...

Exactly. Apart from that, bomb blasts in India are mostly low intensity blasts unlike in Afghanistan and Middle Eastern countries. We have pressure cooker bombs being used here.
 
Back
Top Bottom