What's new

In Indonesia, 1998 violence against ethnic Chinese remains unaddressed

Status
Not open for further replies.

艹艹艹

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jul 7, 2016
Messages
5,198
Reaction score
0
Country
China
Location
China
In Indonesia, 1998 violence against ethnic Chinese remains unaddressed
Twelve years after the ouster of President Suharto, who was believed to have encouraged racial attacks, ethnic Chinese have seen their lot improve but many say they are still treated like outsiders.
By John M. Glionna, Los Angeles Times

Reporting from Jakarta, Indonesia —



Ruminah winces as she recalls the afternoon a mob ransacked her tiny hair salon, smashing windows and destroying both the business and her faith in justice in her homeland.

More than a decade later, the reason she was attacked still haunts her: She is part Chinese.

In May 1998, during two deadly days of racially fueled mayhem, rioters killed 1,000 people and raped 87 women, most of Chinese descent. Others cowered in their homes as the rape squads, reportedly led by army thugs, roamed the streets of Jakarta, the Indonesian capital.

The petite Ruminah, who, like many here, goes by one name, lost more than her shop that day. Her developmentally disabled son was killed in a fire set by looters at a nearby mall.

"I'm not a smart person," said Ruminah, 54, an Indonesian-born Muslim whose grandmother married a Chinese merchant here, "but I know my son died that day because he looked Chinese."

Many of the 5 million ethnic Chinese here, who represent a scant 2% of the population in this predominantly Muslim nation of 248 million, have for years awaited the results of a government investigation of the attacks. Twelve years later, no arrests have been made.

The inquiry stalled years ago when investigators said they failed to find hard evidence of military involvement. The Indonesian government has recently suggested that it will no longer pursue the matter, despite lingering suspicions that the riots were instigated by soldiers influenced by the nation's political leadership.

Without an official report to the contrary, many Indonesians question whether the rapes even occurred.

For ethnic Chinese, long viewed as scapegoats for Indonesia's economic woes, life after the 1998 riots has been bittersweet. On one hand, more Chinese Indonesians have run for public office and a number of discriminatory laws have been repealed. Yet many still feel like unwanted outsiders, their community cast as a greedy merchant class with allegiances to Indonesia and China.

Without question, analysts say, there has been progress since the ouster of President Suharto, whose government required ethnic Chinese to adopt Indonesian names and banned Chinese characters and festivals.

After the dictator was forced from office in 1998, the year of the riots that many believe he fomented, Indonesia has encouraged the spread of Chinese culture.

"The lot of ethnic Chinese here has greatly improved since Suharto, but that doesn't mean the riots' underlying problems have been resolved," said Leo Suryadinata, a professor at Singapore's Nanyang Technological University who focuses on Chinese Indonesian issues. "Issues of poverty, ethnic tension and a gap between rich and poor that led to the violence are still very much alive."

Many say the rise of Islamic fundamentalism has further marginalized ethnic Chinese. In one rural province, clerics recently disrupted a Chinese parade, arguing that the noise of firecrackers and running dragons interfered with Muslim prayer rites.

"Many Indonesians still believe people with Chinese blood keep close allegiances to Beijing," said Andy Yentriyani, a leader of the National Commission on Violence Against Women. "The idea is that any freedoms or authority given the ethnic Chinese will come back to harm Indonesia."

Discrimination against ethnic Chinese here dates back centuries to the Dutch colonial era, when thousands were killed or forced into ghettos. Ethnic Chinese were also attacked in the Indonesian government's anti-communist purges of the mid-1960s.

In the 1980s came calls for Suharto to rein in numerous large Chinese business conglomerates that many argued controlled the economy. But while most ethnic Chinese were considered to be members of the wealthy merchant class, many were actually small-business men, shopkeepers or traders.

In Ruminah's lower-class street in East Jakarta, neighbors viewed her as Chinese, even though the mother of five has never truly identified with her Chinese roots. She can't speak Chinese and doesn't even know where in China to trace her roots.

"They would ask the same question: 'Why do you live here among the poor? We know that all the Chinese are rich,' " Ruminah recalled.

Local boys teased her 14-year-old son, Gunawan, but not because of his learning disability. "They harassed him because he looked Chinese," she said. "He would come home crying, and my husband would tell him to ignore the taunts. He said they were just words."

That changed during the 1998 Asian financial crisis, when mobs took to the streets and attacked ethnic Chinese they blamed for the economic downturn. Many analysts believe Suharto encouraged the violence to take the pressure off his government for the loss of jobs and rising prices.

On the first night, Ruminah went looking for her son, who had gone to watch a fire at a local mall. Later, wearing a mask to guard against the stench, she inspected hundreds of corpses laid out in the parking lot outside the mall.

She never found him. "I only have his burned clothes," she said, her voice breaking.

For years, Indonesia was viewed as a perilous place for ethnic Chinese. In 2004, a U.S. court granted political asylum to an Indonesian national of Chinese descent who claimed that a return to her homeland would amount to a death sentence. She was just one among the tens of thousands of Chinese Indonesians who have fled the country.

Even now, as ethnic Chinese citizens run for office, prejudices continue.

Sofyan Tan was recently defeated in a run for mayor in the city of Medan, the capital of northern Sumatra. In an interview, the city's first Chinese Indonesian political candidate said opponents waged a campaign to scare voters into believing he would sell the nation to China.

"More hard work is required to show that leadership cannot be based on race and religion," he said.

Activists say there are new efforts at national healing. Prabowo Subianto, the former son-in-law of Suharto, met last summer with ethnic Chinese to publicly explain for the first time that he was not involved in the mayhem.

"Many are still ambivalent about his story," said Jemma Purdey, a research fellow at the Center of Southeast Asian Studies at Monash University in Australia. "But if you meet someone and they tell you straight to your face they didn't have part in things, you have to respect that."

Last fall, government officials also met with historians to draft language for Indonesian school textbooks acknowledging that the anti-ethnic Chinese bloodshed actually happened.

"The scar from that violence remains," said Yentriyani, the commission leader. "How much Indonesians want to heal it, depends on who you talk to."

For now, Ruminah isn't taking any chances about the return of ethnic violence. She runs her beauty shop out of her home, where she feels more secure.

She has seen Muslim youths break off a relationship with her college-age daughter once they learn of her Chinese roots. And she misses her son, who never got the chance to come to terms with his Chinese heritage.

Still, she says, she won't follow the ethnic Chinese who have fled Indonesia since the riots.

"I'm not ashamed of who I am," she said. "This is my country. Where else can I go?"

Ethnic Chinese leave Indonesian city for Malaysia, Singapore after riots

Haunted by the trauma of anti-Chinese rioting in 1998, a number of residents of Tanjungbalai, North Sumatra, have fled their homes following the recent ransacking and burning of viharas and pagodas in the port city.

A member of the Indonesian-Chinese community, Tony, alias Aci, said that those who had left were so traumatized by the incident, fearful that the 1998 anti-Chinese riots would be repeated, that they had decided to go abroad.

He said many of them had left for Malaysia and Singapore as both countries were close to Tanjungbalai.

"Many of them have still not returned from Malaysia and Singapore. They say they are still traumatized," Tony, who runs his own business, told The Jakarta Post on Wednesday.

He said he was in Singapore when the riot broke out in city at the end of July and saw many people of Chinese descent from the city arriving in Singapore.

He himself was afraid to return home for three days after the riot.

"Who was not frightened at that time? All the temples were burned and destroyed, just like in the riots in 1998," said Tony, who said he had always previously felt comfortable living in Tanjungbalai.
 
. .
I will never forget...
I will never forgive...
China is not what she was like in 1998.
We are not that barbarian country. But If any such thing happens again, I'm 100% sure China will never remain silent and will fight back.

We have seen how Chinese government and those patriotic overseas Chinese in Greece successfully helped thousands of Chinese citizens and other ethic Chinese to evacuate from Libya in such an efficient and effective way, while a lot of western nations simply "forgot" their own nationals in Libya.




I see confidence and competence, as well as the Chinese heart of those Greek Chinese.
They have rented any available hotel, bus, restaurant and planes to ensure the wellbeing and welfare of Chinese from Libya in the Greek Island of Crete. The Chinese government in mainland China and overseas Chinese communities ensured such a successful evacuation before the outburst of Libyan war, which is never seen in history.

If there were another time, history would never repeat.
@Daniel808


Lydia evacuation
image.jpeg

Img330429492.jpg
Img330429503.jpg
Img330429496.jpg
Img330429497.jpg
Img330429501.jpg
Img330429495.jpg


We will never forget...
We will never forgive...

 
Last edited:
. .
Nice... keep up the good work, Indonesia.

You are welcome, i will keep that in mind. Now please get in line, thank you.


Please do not embarrass Indonesia. Do you agree that Indonesian the country with largest moslem population but behaving like barbaric with low moral standard? Don't strengthen this kind of perception to all foreigners please.
 
Last edited:
.
Explaining Anti-Chinese Riots in Late 20th Century Indonesia
SAMSU RIZAL PANGGABEAN Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
and
BENJAMIN SMITH * University of Florida, USA

During the first five months of 1998, Indonesia underwent a destabilizing but ultimately successful transition that culminated in 1999 in the seating of a new democratic government. The process that led to Suharto’s resignation on May 21, however, was marked by some extremely heavy-handed interventions in contentious politics by elements of his regime that included the purposeful orchestration of anti-Chinese riots in Jakarta, Medan, and Solo. We endeavored in this essay to explain why Medan and Solo, in particular, were wracked by anti-Chinese violence while the similar cities of Surabaya and Yogyakarta were spared the escalation of sparking events into full-blown ethnic rioting and illustrate that anti-Chinese riots were a conscious tactic employed by state security forces. In the face of unmanageable student demonstrations that (a) began to attract large mass followings off campuses and (b) focused their rhetorical and geographical energies on the regimes’ inability to cope with the economic crisis, security forces and especially army special forces units deployed preman with whom they had standing ties. These preman took preexisting mass mobilization-against the regime—and actively shifted its rhetorical and targeting frame to one focused on ethnic Chinese businessmen and their property. These actions by no means created anti-Chinese prejudice out of thin air. A long historical legacy of active construction of ethnic cleavages by Dutch colonial authorities and then by both the Sukarno and Suharto regimes, along with a seriously skewed concentration of capital in the ethnic Chinese commercial community in most major Indonesian cities, generated a sense among pribumi Indonesians of economic favoritism toward the Chinese. However, nearly all the time interethnic relations are peaceful, if not always harmonious, and antiChinese violence has been rare. Only when mass politics began to grow out of the army’s ability to control it in May 1998 did it turn to anti-Chinese riots as a solution. This carries one positive implication: given the transition in 1999, the successful second elections of 2004 and upcoming third elections in 2009, and the increasing retrenchment of the Indonesian armed forces from politics, it seems unlikely that such political crises would again catalyze state-orchestrated ethnic riots against Chinese. Looking more broadly at the dynamics of ethnic riots, the May riots in Indonesia suggest that we ought to refine and expand our focus on states as not just passive builders of 240 WORLD DEVELOPMENT structural conditions but as central and proximate actors in the development of riots. Where Brass (1997) notes that scholars of ethnic politics can learn much by asking who stands to benefit from the labeling of events as “communal violence,’’ we concur. Moreover, in authoritarian settings, especially ones marked by preexisting ethnic prejudices like these, crisis periods are among the most likely ones for state actors to play central roles. What does this mean for the comparative study of ethnic riots? For one, it suggests a need for renewed and more systematic attention to local state actors alongside the already well-developed theories focused on political competition, civic life, and ethnic identity construction. To be frank, data collection, especially of the quantitative sort, is likely to be more dif- ficult in this direction than in others but is no less important


thanks the lord for helping indonesians stop that f***ing regime. imagine what else might happen if indonesian didn't.
 
.
Sorry, restricted area... please move to the hall behind this corridor to proceed with the gas chamber. Thank you...

OK I have reported your post to Admin.

Your post is not only embarrassing Indonesia to foreigners but also provoke hatred and hostility toward Indonesia.
I dont think you are trully Indonesian, maybe ISIL under disguise
 
. .

I think this is about gangster, not about racism. It just happen the most of the merchant in that market are chinese.

Thank you very much. Now go, don't be late for your execution time.

If you are living in Indonesia, you'd better leave!

Indonesia is a sweet and peaceful country without people like you. Indonesia should be purged from barbaric persons.
 
.
Well, inter ethnic relationship still major obstacle in Indonesia, here like in Indonesian said "bara dalam sekam". Prejudice and miss understanding mix with sentiment still existed in daily life, whatever our government or media try to 'cover' it. 1998 tragedy was a bad day not only for our Indonesian Chinese, but all of Indonesian, it's right we become 'scapegoat' but it's more political matter instigated by some element with money and power that still 'unknown' these day unfortunately. 1998 happen because politics and Tanjung Balai happen because mainly personal matter, but not totally based on inter-ethnic problem, that kind problem only existed within some peoples, not majority, we now can think, and learn better from what already happen in the past. Only block-head can provoked by only bunch of words from anon source, not by fact.
 
. .
Indonesians with Chinese blood are usually rich, the rest of indonesians are always poor. Main reason for such violence is the jealousy of the lazy indonesians.

Rich a shtt. A lot of Chinese living in slum after 1998 riot till nowadays. If your maket, your business, your property were damaged even destroyed again and again, without getting any compensation from govt, can you be rich?
 
.
During the first five months of 1998, Indonesia underwent a destabilizing but ultimately successful transition that culminated in 1999 in the seating of a new democratic government. The process that led to Suharto’s resignation on May 21, however, was marked by some extremely heavy-handed interventions in contentious politics by elements of his regime that included the purposeful orchestration of anti-Chinese riots in Jakarta, Medan, and Solo. We endeavored in this essay to explain why Medan and Solo, in particular, were wracked by anti-Chinese violence while the similar cities of Surabaya and Yogyakarta were spared the escalation of sparking events into full-blown ethnic rioting and illustrate that anti-Chinese riots were a conscious tactic employed by state security forces. In the face of unmanageable student demonstrations that (a) began to attract large mass followings off campuses and (b) focused their rhetorical and geographical energies on the regimes’ inability to cope with the economic crisis, security forces and especially army special forces units deployed preman with whom they had standing ties. These preman took preexisting mass mobilization-against the regime—and actively shifted its rhetorical and targeting frame to one focused on ethnic Chinese businessmen and their property. These actions by no means created anti-Chinese prejudice out of thin air. A long historical legacy of active construction of ethnic cleavages by Dutch colonial authorities and then by both the Sukarno and Suharto regimes, along with a seriously skewed concentration of capital in the ethnic Chinese commercial community in most major Indonesian cities, generated a sense among pribumi Indonesians of economic favoritism toward the Chinese. However, nearly all the time interethnic relations are peaceful, if not always harmonious, and antiChinese violence has been rare. Only when mass politics began to grow out of the army’s ability to control it in May 1998 did it turn to anti-Chinese riots as a solution. This carries one positive implication: given the transition in 1999, the successful second elections of 2004 and upcoming third elections in 2009, and the increasing retrenchment of the Indonesian armed forces from politics, it seems unlikely that such political crises would again catalyze state-orchestrated ethnic riots against Chinese. Looking more broadly at the dynamics of ethnic riots, the May riots in Indonesia suggest that we ought to refine and expand our focus on states as not just passive builders of 240 WORLD DEVELOPMENT structural conditions but as central and proximate actors in the development of riots. Where Brass (1997) notes that scholars of ethnic politics can learn much by asking who stands to benefit from the labeling of events as “communal violence,’’ we concur. Moreover, in authoritarian settings, especially ones marked by preexisting ethnic prejudices like these, crisis periods are among the most likely ones for state actors to play central roles. What does this mean for the comparative study of ethnic riots? For one, it suggests a need for renewed and more systematic attention to local state actors alongside the already well-developed theories focused on political competition, civic life, and ethnic identity construction. To be frank, data collection, especially of the quantitative sort, is likely to be more dif- ficult in this direction than in others but is no less important


thanks the lord for helping indonesians stop that f***ing regime. imagine what else might happen if indonesian didn't.

"Only when mass politics began to grow out of the army’s ability to control it in May 1998 did it turn to anti-Chinese riots as a solution. "
Why turn to anti-Chinese riots is a solution?
 
. . .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom