What's new

IN A WAR WITH RUSSIA, NATO HAS NO CHANCE

Russians couldn't hold Afghanistan which had no proper military force at that time, then how the hell are they going to dream of invading SA?


So couldnt USSR and the hundreds of other nations that tried.

Don't sell the crap, every turk, mangol and timurid coming down from centeral asia first conqure afghanistan and then they enter in current day Pakistan, british beat them, sikh beat them. Thats a myth develop by Pakistanis that Afghanistan is unconquerable.
 
.
it all depends upon where the fighting is.

If you want to pick a neutral area like Zimbabwe I think Russia is going to have more logistic problems than the US.

If we are going to fight on Russia's border of course they will have a logistics edge. So yes it will be more of a problem for the US to fight Russia on their front porch.
 
.
carriers-2013.gif


Thats always my go to answer these days. They are the ultimate war machine, if you can send out the worlds biggest fleet by far to almost anywhere in the world fairly quickly then who can stop you?
 
.
does Russia have an economy to fight an war with an enemy that is not a bunch of rag tag nutters in the desert.

Russia will cease to be in a war with Britain.

Flying a few planes near UK airspace and subs near UK for internal media consumption is not the same as actually taking on a capable enemy.

Russia's economy is weak, it's armed forces nothing much to fear and it has few friends..... None of that is the case for Britain

Do you realise a few properly placed cruise missile strikes and HPM attacks on British command and control would decapitate it.? As for Russian forces ,much superior than what you claim they are. The performance against ISIS is testament enough to that.

Second,Russia is a vast land with a multilayered command and control appartus,comparable to USA. Third,Russia has massive underground cities like Yamantau lol.

Britain would be roadkill for Russia. After the destruction of command and communication facilities and destruction of the logistics train ,Britain would come to the negotiation table.

The Global firepower conventional forces rating ,Russia is No.2 .
Global Firepower - 2015 World Military Strength Rankings
 
.
The only interesting thing about this thread is how it attempts to troll Americans, and got basically no response. Whatever guys.
 
.
Of course NATO has no chance, almost half of heir military force are closeted gay men who probably prefer joining in gay pride parade rather than fighting Russia.
 
. .
Do you realise a few properly placed cruise missile strikes and HPM attacks on British command and control would decapitate it.? As for Russian forces ,much superior than what you claim they are. The performance against ISIS is testament enough to that.

Second,Russia is a vast land with a multilayered command and control appartus,comparable to USA. Third,Russia has massive underground cities like Yamantau lol.

Britain would be roadkill for Russia. After the destruction of command and communication facilities and destruction of the logistics train ,Britain would come to the negotiation table.

The Global firepower conventional forces rating ,Russia is No.2 .
Global Firepower - 2015 World Military Strength Rankings


UK forces would be just sitting idle during all this time I suppose....

NATO will be sitting idle as well.

It's absolutely hilarious that people actually think Russia would have any kind of operational freedom going in against an able power like Britain.

Britain proactively monitors threats against it and actively takes measures.

Russia bullying Georgia, Ukraine or sending a few jets into Syria does not mean it has ability to project any power westward.

Only thing of note that Russia has is its nukes.... Beyond that there is not much that is a threat.
 
.
UK forces would be just sitting idle during all this time I suppose....

NATO will be sitting idle as well.

It's absolutely hilarious that people actually think Russia would have any kind of operational freedom going in against an able power like Britain.

Britain proactively monitors threats against it and actively takes measures.

Russia bullying Georgia, Ukraine or sending a few jets into Syria does not mean it has ability to project any power westward.

Only thing of note that Russia has is its nukes.... Beyond that there is not much that is a threat.

This post sure does belong to comedy central. Hell,India's conventional power is greater than Britain and Russia is even greater . Lol,

Indian Air Force Sukhois Dominate UK Fighter Jets in Combat Exercises

The only saving grace is USA. Without USA ,no NATO .
 
. .
Why dont you change your avatar flag to Russian flag? Are you shamed to use it or what is the reason?
He is Superboy. He claims to be a Chinese immigrant first
This post sure does belong to comedy central. Hell,India's conventional power is greater than Britain and Russia is even greater . Lol,

Indian Air Force Sukhois Dominate UK Fighter Jets in Combat Exercises

The only saving grace is USA. Without USA ,no NATO .


Are you joking? Britains global military reach and capabilities is farrrr ahead of anything India can ever dream of. Both are not even in the same league. Its a Joke if you think India has a more potent military capabilities than Britain . Just because they have more soldiers/manpower/numbers doesn't mean anything. If we were to measure Global military power by numbers then North Korea will be the world's third largest naval power. Lmao.
Don't also forget that Saudi Arabia has more British made jets than Britain itself. Does that mean Saudi Arabia has a more capable military power than Britain? Ahahahahah.....lool
 
.
He is Superboy. He claims to be a Chinese immigrant first


Are you joking? Britains global military reach and capabilities is farrrr ahead of anything India can ever dream of. Both are not even in the same league. Its a Joke if you think India has a more potent military capabilities than Britain . Just because they have more soldiers/manpower/numbers doesn't mean anything. If we were to measure Global military power by numbers then North Korea will be the world's third largest naval power. Lmao.
Don't also forget that Saudi Arabia has more British made jets than Britain itself. Does that mean Saudi Arabia has a more capable military power than Britain? Ahahahahah.....lool

My friend, I think you guys have patronised these indians to your own peril, now they think that they have become so powerful that they can easily colonize Britain if they want to. When I feel like watching a comedy I just read the comments of these indians. It's pure entertainment.
 
.
My friend, I think you guys have patronised these indians to your own peril, now they think that they have become so powerful that they can easily colonize Britain if they want to. When I feel like watching a comedy I just read the comments of these indians. It's pure entertainment.

Well, its more like our media likes exaggerating the capabilities of other developing countries we consider as potential rivals for political reasons obviously. Lol The U.S often does the same thing with China as well, only difference here is that the Chinese are no fools, they are quite smart/cautious not to fall in this trap, since they know the game Tha is bing played and they also know where they stand vis a vis the U.S and other western powers, so they take their time to sort their basic needs first instead of rushing things and not having a proper laid out plan/vision . :).
Others can believe what they want though. :)
 
.
Do you actually believe that all of NATO countires will go to war with Russia?I mean, come on...
Google that bcs I cant post links :
NATO's European Allies Won't Fight for Article 5
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom