Imran's nikah with Bushra Bibi was illegal, deposes Mufti Saeed

[muhammadhafeezmalik]

Since its the mufti who came up with such claim so he better prove his own allegations .btw how many lashes have been recommended for Qazaf?

5. Registration of marriages.– (1) Every marriage solemnized under Muslim Law shall be registered in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance.

[7][(2) For the purpose of registration of marriages under this Ordinance, the Union Council shall grant licenses to one or more persons, to be called Nikah Registrars.]

(3) Every marriage not solemnized by the Nikah Registrar shall, for the purpose of registration under this Ordinance, be reported to him by the person who has solemnized such marriage.

(4) Whoever contravenes the provisions of sub-section (3) shall be punishable with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.

(5) The form of nikahnama, the registers to be maintained by Nikah Registrars, the records to be preserved by Union Councils, the manner in which marriages shall be registered and copies of nikahnama shall be supplied to the parties, and the fees to be charged therefor, shall be such as may be prescribed.

(6) Any person may, on payment of the prescribed fee, if any, inspect at the office of the Union Council the record preserved under sub-section (5), or obtain a copy of any entry therein.

6. Polygamy.– (1) No man, during the subsistence of an existing marriage, shall, except with the previous permission in writing of the Arbitration Council, contract another marriage, nor shall any such marriage contracted without such permission be registered under this Ordinance.

(2) An application for permission under sub-section (1) shall be submitted to the Chairman in the prescribed manner, together with the prescribed fee, and shall state reasons for the proposed marriage, and whether the consent of existing wife or wives has been obtained thereto.

[8][(2A) The Nikah Registrar or the person who solemnizes a Nikah shall accurately fill all the columns of the nikahnama form with specific answers of the bride or the bridegroom.]

(3) On receipt of the application under sub-section (2), the Chairman shall ask the applicant and his existing wife or wives each to nominate a representative, and the Arbitration Council so constituted may, if satisfied that the proposed marriage is necessary and just, grant, subject to such conditions, if any, as may be deemed fit, the permission applied for.

[9][(4) If a person contravenes the provision of:

(i) subsection (2A), he shall be punished to simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month and fine of twenty five thousand rupees; and

(ii) subsection (3), he shall be punished to simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months and fine of one hundred thousand rupees.]

(5) Any man who contracts another marriage without the permission of the Arbitration Council shall,

(a) pay immediately the entire amount of the dower, whether prompt or deferred, due to the existing wife or wives, which amount, if not so paid, shall be recoverable as arrears of land revenue; and

[10][(b) on conviction upon complaint be punishable with the simple imprisonment which may extend to one year and with fine of five hundred thousand rupees.]

7. Talaq.– (1) Any man who wishes to divorce his wife shall, as soon as may be after the pronouncement of talaq in any form whatsoever, give the Chairman notice in writing of his having done so, and shall supply a copy thereof to the wife.

(2) Whoever, contravenes the provisions of sub-section (1) shall be punishable with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both.

(3) Save as provided in sub-section (5), a talaq, unless revoked earlier, expressly or otherwise, shall not be effective until the expiration of ninety days from the day on which notice under sub-section (1) is delivered to the Chairman.

(4) Within thirty days of the receipt of notice under sub-section (1), the Chairman shall constitute an Arbitration Council for the purpose of bringing about a reconciliation between the parties, and the Arbitration Council shall take all steps necessary to bring about such reconciliation.

(5) If the wife be pregnant at the time talaq is pronounced, talaq shall not be effect until the period mentioned in sub-section [11][(3)] or the pregnancy, whichever be later, ends.

(6) Nothing shall debar a wife whose marriage has been terminated by talaq effective under this section from remarrying the same husband, without an intervening marriage with a third person, unless such termination is for the third time so effective.

The Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961

He can be imprisoned for one month and a fine of Rs.25000, plus his license can be cancelled.

The Section 7 of this MFLO is also very interesting.

 

[mangochutney]

They’re living in sin against the Law of God and following shaitan .

I call a spade a spade the relationship is haraam the woman needs punishment as she is already married while having sex with another man .
Imran Khan also needs to be punished for this otherwise the whole of the next generation Pakistanis will live immoral sinful satanic lives .

It’s wrong and I’m pti supporter if they’re adamant they didn’t go against Gods law they need to prove it .

 

[Kharral]

Mufti Saeed, who solemnised nikah of PTI Chairman Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi, told a court on Wednesday that it was unlawful and against the tenets of Islam.

The mufti deposed in a case of illegal marriage against Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi before Senior Civil Judge Nasr Minullah.

Mufti Saeed stated that Imran contacted him by phone on Jan 1, 2018, and asked him to solemnise his nikah with Bushra Bibi. He said he had cordial relations with Imran as he was a member of his core committee.

According to Mufti Saeed, a woman was accompanying Bushra Bibi who introduced herself as her sister. He said he asked the woman whether nikah could be solemnised according to tenets of Islam. On his query, the woman replied that all shariah conditions of nikah had been fulfilled.

The mufti told the court that he solemnised nikah on January 1, 2018, on the assurance of the woman.

He said Imran contacted him in February and requested him to solemnise nikah again.

According to mufti, Imran told him that at the time of first nikah, Bushra Bibi's Iddah period was not complete as she was divorced in November 2017.

Imran told him that according to a prediction, he would become prime minister if he got married to Bushra Bibi on Jan 1, Mufti Saeed continued. Imran himself told him that his nikah was illegal, the mufti maintained.

He said despite knowing that their marriage was unlawful, they solemnised nikah.

Imran's nikah with Bushra Bibi was illegal, deposes Mufti Saeed

The mufti deposed in a case of illegal marriage against Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi before a court.

dunyanews.tv

'Bushra Bibi married Imran Khan during her Iddat', Mufti Saeed tells court

Mufti Saeed records his statement before local court in Islamabad.Cleric says Bushra Bibi's sister confirmed her Iddat had ended. Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi's nikah solemnised twice.

www.geo.tv

IK’s real Sin here, is the fact that he associated with such an utterly Harami maulvi & gave him positions. There is no way he didn’t know or wasn’t aware of his asliyat. If IK comes out & professes ignorance of this Ibn e Haram’s character then he’s worthy of a Paanja by Punjab Puls at the very least.

However what’s way more alarming is the fact that this Maulvi is a tool of establishment. I am sure there are many many more such tools at the service of Establishment.

The primary goal of this establishment has always been ‘ corruption & subversion ‘ of Pakistani society and it has excelled at it.

Not only is this establishment a threat to people’s life, property & dignity, it is also a huge threat to people’s faith & beliefs.

In the context of Pakistan, establishment is the creator of corrupt practices, everyone else is a mere practitioner.

 

[Vortex]

Stupid, Maulvi did not go to court, someone else filed a petition in court and Mufti was called to testify.

IK’s real Sin here, is the fact that he associated with such an utterly Harami maulvi & gave him positions. There is no way he didn’t know or wasn’t aware of his asliyat. If IK comes out & professes ignorance of this Ibn e Haram’s character then he’s worthy of a Paanja by Punjab Puls at the very least.

However what’s way more alarming is the fact that this Maulvi is a tool of establishment. I am sure there are many many more such tools at the service of Establishment.

The primary goal of this establishment has always been ‘ corruption & subversion ‘ of Pakistani society and it has excelled at it.

Not only is this establishment a threat to people’s life, property & dignity, it is also a huge threat to people’s faith & beliefs.

In the context of Pakistan, establishment is the creator of corrupt practices, everyone else is a mere practitioner.

Everyone can be fooled by mufti and imams

I was thinking same thing, maybe bush bibi or mufti or both are agents of either establishment or nawaz..

 

[Neelo]

 

[ziaulislam]

They’re living in sin against the Law of God and following shaitan .

I call a spade a spade the relationship is haraam the woman needs punishment as she is already married while having sex with another man .
Imran Khan also needs to be punished for this otherwise the whole of the next generation Pakistanis will live immoral sinful satanic lives .

It’s wrong and I’m pti supporter if they’re adamant they didn’t go against Gods law they need to prove it .

And you need to redo kalima.


As both husband and wife claim that talaq happened 8 months ago before second marriage

Paper work has no value in Islam so doesn't matter when it was officially annulled in papers.(even though it's clear that even in papers marriage was annulled months ago)

The case will only be valid if husband claims bushra was still married to her. In such case the opinion is divided.


Tomorrow if a husband divorce her wife he will need to do against 4 witness so you can be satisfied

 

[Babaasif]

Who is at fault here.The mufti who read the nikah or the couple whose nikah was done

 

[PakAlp]

Who is at fault here.The mufti who read the nikah or the couple whose nikah was done

The couple, because you can trick or lie to the mufti, his job is to ask are you allowed to marry and if they yes then he does the nikah, if you lie then nikah is not valid even if mufti says it is. I am not talking about IK situation but a general Islamic rule.

 

[Kharral]

Everyone can be fooled by mufti and imams

I was thinking same thing, maybe bush bibi or mufti or both are agents of either establishment or nawaz..

Imran Khan is no fool & no saint either. He is a politician after all & the lust of Power is a very real trait. Power or the pursuit of it corrupts & establishment being the local representative of Shaytan is ever present to corrupt those who aren’t already corrupt.

You are giving too much credit to Nawaz, what ever little power he enjoys or better put the perception of it, is courtesy Establishment. Nawaz was once Imran too, although a made in Gawalmandi version of him.

Darbari Mullahs & Bush bibis are the tools & assets of Shaytan & kids ltd.

 

[PradoTLC]

Mufti Saeed, who solemnised nikah of PTI Chairman Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi, told a court on Wednesday that it was unlawful and against the tenets of Islam.

The mufti deposed in a case of illegal marriage against Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi before Senior Civil Judge Nasr Minullah.

Mufti Saeed stated that Imran contacted him by phone on Jan 1, 2018, and asked him to solemnise his nikah with Bushra Bibi. He said he had cordial relations with Imran as he was a member of his core committee.

According to Mufti Saeed, a woman was accompanying Bushra Bibi who introduced herself as her sister. He said he asked the woman whether nikah could be solemnised according to tenets of Islam. On his query, the woman replied that all shariah conditions of nikah had been fulfilled.

The mufti told the court that he solemnised nikah on January 1, 2018, on the assurance of the woman.

He said Imran contacted him in February and requested him to solemnise nikah again.

According to mufti, Imran told him that at the time of first nikah, Bushra Bibi's Iddah period was not complete as she was divorced in November 2017.

Imran told him that according to a prediction, he would become prime minister if he got married to Bushra Bibi on Jan 1, Mufti Saeed continued. Imran himself told him that his nikah was illegal, the mufti maintained.

He said despite knowing that their marriage was unlawful, they solemnised nikah.

Imran's nikah with Bushra Bibi was illegal, deposes Mufti Saeed

The mufti deposed in a case of illegal marriage against Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi before a court.

dunyanews.tv

'Bushra Bibi married Imran Khan during her Iddat', Mufti Saeed tells court

Mufti Saeed records his statement before local court in Islamabad.Cleric says Bushra Bibi's sister confirmed her Iddat had ended. Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi's nikah solemnised twice.

www.geo.tv

You know PDM and Army have really run out of options when all they can get is some tinpot mullah to make non substantive statements about a marriage contract timing…

Ps now he remembers?


Seriously they have tried every thing under the book for scum bag tricks .. ie assassination, fake cases , torture of supporters, etc i wonder what else will think of next?

Any way this retarded case will be believed noonies and low brain idiots.

Remember it was not too long ago these seem morons where screaming “toshakhana” watch thief etc … all went quiet when the full report showed that noonies and co. turned out to be the biggest violators.



Time has a funny way of exposing hypocrisy especially in the case of noonies ..

 

[Vortex]

Imran Khan is no fool & no saint either. He is a politician after all & the lust of Power is a very real trait. Power or the pursuit of it corrupts & establishment being the local representative of Shaytan is ever present to corrupt those who aren’t already corrupt.

You are giving too much credit to Nawaz, what ever little power he enjoys or better put the perception of it, is courtesy Establishment. Nawaz was once Imran too, although a made in Gawalmandi version of him.

Darbari Mullahs & Bush bibis are the tools & assets of Shaytan & kids ltd.

Their is a fundamental difference between one wanting power for continuing raping country and one wanting power to change country.

Nobody is Saint, neither you are nor I am. The difference will be what motivate you and what motivate me !

 

[Kharral]

Their is a fundamental difference between one wanting power for continuing raping country and one wanting power to change country.

Nobody is Saint, neither you are nor I am. The difference will be what motivate you and what motivate me !

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Pursuit of a Halal objective in a not so Halal manner is no excuse for corruption ( I am talking about his association with this mufti & subsequently awarding him positions ). This molvi had ‘Establishment ka Purza’ written all over him & he availed his services because it was convenient for him. This is exactly how subversion works & leadership compromised.

Don’t let this slide, else you’ll be defending an even worse compromise.

 

[PradoTLC]

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Pursuit of a Halal objective in a not so Halal manner is no excuse for corruption ( I am talking about his association with this mufti & subsequently awarding him positions ). This molvi had ‘Establishment ka Purza’ written all over him & he availed his services because it was convenient for him. This is exactly how subversion works & leadership compromised.

Don’t let this slide, else you’ll be defending an even worse compromise.

True

But noonies have sinister intentions plus bad behavior

So which level of hell do you think noonies will end up?

 

[Kharral]

True

But noonies have sinister intentions plus bad behavior

So which level of hell do you think noonies will end up?

ڈونگے دوزخ دے وچ

 

[muhammadhafeezmalik]

Court declares Imran-Bushra ‘illegal marriage’ case admissible​

Dismisses verdict of civil court which declared petition inadmissible​

Former first lady and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan's wife Bushra Bibi. — TheNews/File
ISLAMABAD: The Additional District and Sessions Judge (ADSJ), Islamabad, Muhammad Azam Khan, on Thursday declared the illegal marriage case of former prime minister Imran Khan with Bushra Bibi during Iddat admissible.



The court has dismissed the verdict of the civil court in which the judge declared the petition inadmissible. The ADSJ has remanded back the case.

A civil court in Islamabad declared as inadmissible a petition that contended that former premier Imran Khan and former first lady Bushra Bibi cohabited despite the fact that their first nikah had taken place without completion of the latter’s mandatory Iddat period.

The petitioner, Muhammad Hanif, claimed that Bushra Bibi was divorced by her former husband in November 2017 and married Imran Khan on January 1, 2018 despite the fact that her Iddat period had not ended “which is against the Sharia and Muslim norms.”

The complainant submitted in the court the statements of Mufti Muhammad Saeed, who conducted the marriage between Imran and Bushra, and Awn Chaudhry, Imran’s close friend who was one of the witnesses. The civil court noted that the alleged nikah was solemnized in Lahore. “Therefore, the offense, if any, was committed, took place within the jurisdiction of the learned court of competent jurisdiction in Lahore, which could have the cognizance thereof.”

The civil court judge noted that the complainant, if aggrieved of any act of the respondents, should approach the court of competent jurisdiction in Lahore. Describing the reasons for filing the petition in Islamabad, the petitioner said Imran and Bushra moved to the federal capital soon after their nikah and went into “valid retirement” at Imran’s Banigala residence. Therefore, he said, a court in Islamabad should hear the case.

The court, however, said it lacked jurisdiction to take cognizance of the matter as the nikah was solemnized in the territorial jurisdiction of a competent court in Lahore. “Hence the instant petition is not preceed-able within the territorial jurisdiction of this court.”

The petitioner challenged the decision of civil court. Raja Rizwan Abbasi, the lawyer of petitioner, argued that according to Section 179, this case could be heard in Lahore and Islamabad as well. The Additional District and Sessions Judge (ADSJ), after completion of arguments, has declared admissible the petition and returned this case to the civil court for hearing.

Meanwhile, the Accountability Court No 1 Islamabad Judge Muhammad Bashir on Thursday extended the interim bail of former prime minister Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi in the 190 million pounds Al-Qadir Trust case till July 19. The court also sought final arguments on the bail applications of both Imran and Bushra Bibi on July 19. NAB Deputy Prosecutor General Sardar Muzaffar appeared in the court in the case. Imran Khan’s counsel filed a request for an exemption from appearance for Thursday, which was later granted.

There are many cases regarding May 9 due to which appearance is required in Lahore, Khawaja Haris told the court. The judge told the lawyer to submit the request for an exemption from appearance with the NAB also. The lawyer said the next hearing was on July 19 and presentation of arguments could be fixed for that date. He added that Bushra Bibi’s bail case is also pending.

The judge remarked that the bail cases of both the husband and wife could be fixed on the same date. The accountability court then adjourned the hearing of the case till July 19. Interim bail in the Toshakhana case was also extended till July 19. Meanwhile, a local court in Islamabad once again accepted former prime minister Imran Khan’s exemption plea in the Toshakhana case on Thursday and adjourned the hearing till July 17, 2023. “Where is the accused?” Additional District and Sessions Judge Humayun Dilawar asked during the hearing. Earlier, a local court on Wednesday expressed anger over Imran Khan’s frequent absences in the Toshakhana hearings, noting that the accused had only appeared before the court once during the 7-month period.

Last week, the same court ruled that the case filed by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) against the PTI chairman was maintainable. The court also ordered Imran Khan to appear in person on Thursday but he remained absent.

Meanwhile, the Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) Thursday issued bailable arrest warrant for former prime minister and PTI Chairman Imran Khan in the Judicial Complex riots case.

Judge Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain also issued arrest warrants for the PTI leaders Farrukh Habib, Shibli Faraz and Hassan Niazi in connection with two cases registered by the Ramna police station and one by the Golra police station.

During the hearing, Imran’s counsel Sardar Masroof, Attique-ur-Rehman and Mirza Asim requested for an exemption from attendance in both the cases registered by the Ramna police station, on which the judge remarked that the former premier will have to appear in the court.

The judge then summoned Imran Khan and other accused in personal capacity on July 19.

Earlier this year, intense clashes had broken out between the police and the activists belonging to the PTI chief’s convoy after they reached the Judicial Complex ahead of his appearance before the district and sessions court in the Toshakhana case.

According to the contents of a report, 47 officers and officials of the Islamabad Police were injured during the riots and 34 of them were brought to the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS).

In addition, three injured FC personnel were also brought to the PIMS. SSP Operations Malik Jamil was also among the injured police officers. Jamil was injured due to severe stone pelting by the PTI workers. The SSP (Operations) was also shifted to PIMS. The report stated that party workers had also damaged vehicles and government properties.

Meanwhile, Imran Khan on Thursday skipped his appearance before the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), Rawalpindi, in the £190 million National Crime Agency (NCA) UK settlement case and sought a fresh date for his appearance.

According to sources, Imran submitted a written request for a fresh date for his appearance and said he would appear in Islamabad courts on July 19 and might also appear before the NAB on the same day.

In the call-up notice for July 13, Imran had been asked to bring details of his assets in the country and abroad.

Court declares Imran-Bushra ‘illegal marriage’ case admissible

ISLAMABAD: The Additional District and Sessions Judge , Islamabad, Muhammad Azam Khan, on Thursday declared the illegal marriage case of former prime minister Imran Khan with Bushra Bibi during...

www.thenews.com.pk