Energon
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2007
- Messages
- 1,077
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm trying to get a better perspective on Imran Khan the politician. Mind you, this thread is not designed to serve as a forum to push forth his agenda or slander him (if this is the direction the thread takes I will promptly request the Mods to shut it down). I would like to hear some objective and well thought out comments/criticisms on his positions.
Granted my research has been a bit limited, but I have as yet to come across a substantial list of his positions. Right now it seems like the ideas he's putting forth are actually a haphazard collage of conflicting impromptu stances taken over the duration of the past few turbulent years of Pakistani politics and his own vacillating personal life.
The only positions of substance I have come across so far are:
1. A greater role for Islam: This seems to be a personal position given his personal rediscovery of Islam in the recent years. I don't know if he wants the state to actively participate in enabling this, and if so in what capacity? The GoP has already declared Islam to be the state's religion for some decades now.
2. Pakistan becoming a "true democracy"- whatever that is, I haven't been able to find his definition of this term.
3. Pakistan to become a welfare state.
4. De-centralizing and liberalization of the Pakistani economy. As you can see this is completely contradictory to stance #3.
5. Stability, corruption free and anti-militancy.
All of this is well and good, but there are no details on how he actually plans to realistically put any of his visions into practice. How does one go about bringing an end to radicalism within a highly Islamist population while simultaneously promoting (state sponsored?) religiosity? Even if his intention is to replace the "bad Islam" with "good Islam" it seems a rather improbable because there is very little supportive evidence regarding large scale programs of this sort; also considering being that he is not a cleric or a religious leader, on what basis is he taking these positions?
Then there are other revolving door ad-hoc alliances (with everyone from Fazullah, Nawaz Sharif, Bhutto to his now bitter ally Musharraf) which has made it very difficult for me to actually determine what camp he's really throwing his weight behind (he is certainly not a political force by himself).
Granted my research has been a bit limited, but I have as yet to come across a substantial list of his positions. Right now it seems like the ideas he's putting forth are actually a haphazard collage of conflicting impromptu stances taken over the duration of the past few turbulent years of Pakistani politics and his own vacillating personal life.
The only positions of substance I have come across so far are:
1. A greater role for Islam: This seems to be a personal position given his personal rediscovery of Islam in the recent years. I don't know if he wants the state to actively participate in enabling this, and if so in what capacity? The GoP has already declared Islam to be the state's religion for some decades now.
2. Pakistan becoming a "true democracy"- whatever that is, I haven't been able to find his definition of this term.
3. Pakistan to become a welfare state.
4. De-centralizing and liberalization of the Pakistani economy. As you can see this is completely contradictory to stance #3.
5. Stability, corruption free and anti-militancy.
All of this is well and good, but there are no details on how he actually plans to realistically put any of his visions into practice. How does one go about bringing an end to radicalism within a highly Islamist population while simultaneously promoting (state sponsored?) religiosity? Even if his intention is to replace the "bad Islam" with "good Islam" it seems a rather improbable because there is very little supportive evidence regarding large scale programs of this sort; also considering being that he is not a cleric or a religious leader, on what basis is he taking these positions?
Then there are other revolving door ad-hoc alliances (with everyone from Fazullah, Nawaz Sharif, Bhutto to his now bitter ally Musharraf) which has made it very difficult for me to actually determine what camp he's really throwing his weight behind (he is certainly not a political force by himself).