To a businessman money is the only thing that counts. Money is his god. He is a greedy capitalist who has no honor or
principles.
Things like Pakistan's borders, religious distinctions, plight of Kashmiris, etc are non-issues for businessmen. They want to make their money. And if Indian tourism will
contribute to increased profits then so be it. To hell with Kashmir & two-nation theory.
That is the nature of capitalism.
I'm not sure what IK's agenda is and why he is bending so low to placate Indians while Kashmir's women are being raped and their men being executed and dumped in unmarked mass
graves.
But its looking more and more that he is under the influence of circles who are concerned with only making money.
PTI and some of their supporters, or rather many of their supporters, are certainly acting like they are more concerned about money than the plight of Kashmiris.
Ik supporters, and many others most of whom are liberal but some are religious as well do not support any form of resistance to Indian hegemony. Some are hypnotized by bollywood, many are mental slaves of the Indian narrative, while others have deluded themselves into believing that partition was unnecessary and that they'd have been chums with likes of Jogi Adityanath while the religious ones who criticize Kashmiri struggle were perfectly described by Iqbal as
"Mullah ko hai Hind mein sajday ki ijazat, naadaan ye samajhta hai k Islam hai azad".
We are not man enough to proudly own the Kashmiri freedom struggle---
Our apologetic tone is in a stark contrast to how Iran openly supports anti-Israel groups
Can you imagine a country allowing her enemy to fence a territory she considers rightfully as her own? Well our coward leaders allowed the Indians to fence the LOC which choked mujahideen supply lines---and the armed struggle which was at it's peak was effectively killed by our own leaders in 2003 cease fire. Could Musharraf have been any more shameless than that?
We fear Amrika more than we fear Allah---The result is in front of us---The world respects power, not weakness. The world could care less if a hundred thousand more Kashmiris would have been killed or 10000 more women molested, India is a big market for their goods after all, why loose it over a few thousand Muslims...the world doesn't give two hoots to "peaceful campaign for freedom"? Freedom has to be earned through blood, sweat and sacrifice, it is not handed to you on a platter. That is unless you happen to be a Christian living in East Timor or Darfur.
There is no so-called peaceful solution, the only way to liberate Kashmir is through jihad---The Pakistani who thinks that talks will result in the resolution of Kashmir dispute must be really daft to believe that India will ever squander any part of Kashmir without a fight. We have already tried and failed to make India talk about Kashmir
whenever India's military position was strong in the valley. Talks can only be conducted once you hold some sort of bargaining power for a quid pro quo to take place. In this case talks will only happen once Kashmiris have turned Kashmir into a quagmire for the occupying Indian forces, making the price of occupation crushingly high. There is only one solution, that is the gun solution---the sooner we realize this the better. Our conferences, protests, long marches, speeches at UN are not going to free Kashmir, but alas we are too thick to grasp the harsh realities of this world.
In this day and age, it is not unusual for a country to offer cover/overt military assistance to rebel groups operating in areas under enemy control---recent examples are Russian arming of pro-Russians in Ukraine and Syrian groups armed by other nations and the assistance Iran provides to several anti-Israel groups. Even the Western countries were openly arming Kurdish groups which Turkey considers as terrorists.
Take a look at this
Yesterday's terrorists, today's formal party to war. Back in 2001, 196 nations decided that they would end this "terrorist regime".
When the Taliban tried to talk their way out in 2002, they were branded as terrorists and their offer rejected.
The world only respects power. First phase, "terrorists". Second phase, "insurgents". Third phase, "we gotta talk to them they're a legitimate party to this conflict". That's how things work.
And you mentioned LeGend---don't bother. I had conversed with him about a similar topic in another thread. As per his views, armed Kashmiri freedom struggle is terrorism as he wholly accepts US narrative in all such conflicts. He considers droning, CIA assassinations, torture sites, carpet bombings, state suppression of freedom movements etc all as perfectly legitimate methods of waging wars while in the same breath declaring guerrilla warfare as illegal and cowardly. He wants Muslims to abandon those "cowardly" methods of warfare, assemble in an open ground and offer
Mubarizat (duel) to enemy champions meanwhile the enemy brings forth an AC-130 as it's champion.
I don't personally know any Pakistani who would accept such a condition either.
There are tons of such Pakistanis---One happens to be a close friend of mine and surprisingly a very practicing Muslim ---strangest thing is that he talks very emotionally about Palestine but on Kashmir, he couldn't care less. He is anti-1947partition and anti-Pak army as well, and believes that Pak army couldn't do jack against Indian army. At one discussion he even labelled IA dead as shaheed, then ammended his statement and labelled the Muslim dead of IA as shaheed...Then said that a large number of IA is Muslim ....He is a lot into bollywood, other than bollywood, he is practicing religious person who never misses a prayer....quite a surprising mentality he has....
And did you forget what Shahid Afridi said not a long time ago? That was not the first time I heard such statements about Kashmir tho.
I honestly don't know whether IK is naive, or he's really starting to believe the nonsense that Pakistan's salvation lies in accepting Indian hegemony. Because that's what will happen once the Kashmir issue is put in the back burner, and our economies become intertwined.
All I see from him is constant appeasing and bending over backwards. India is not even serious about resolving this issue. Every time the government talks about Kashmir, India hits back saying Jammu and Kashmir is an internal issue.
Imran Khan holds a soft corner for India. In fact, all of our celebrities which include cricketers have a soft corner for India as they have many friends there.
There was one interview which he gave to an Indian TV quite some time ago (Zardari era), in which he said that Pakistan should forget Kashmir and focus on internal issues...If some one can dig that up....
First it will be non-resident Indians. Then they will extend it to resident Indians, and then finally straight up visa-free travel and cross border travel. All in the name of "but it's good for the economy, we need the money from tourism, wer're all just the same people".
@Sher Shah Awan SO far, this has been a one-way street....Indian fims screened in Pakistan, Indian channels bieng aired in Pakistan....India on the other hand, denied Pakistani TV channels the permission to broadcast in India. There are some very pro-India Pakistanis who allowed all of this.