El Sidd
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2017
- Messages
- 67,597
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Awarding lands for services rendered goes back to antiquity.
do you have those records?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Awarding lands for services rendered goes back to antiquity.
you can legislate freely to stop people with criminal records from Voting as part of punishment. does not mean feudals decide or panchayt decide where the community votesTrue ... 1 vote 1 person - conditional with his character and qualification and hence not valid for everyone.
i am sure Pakistan can formulate an order if it wants.Again when you put some characterless, corrupt and thief by ignoring the merit you will face and keep on facing such - this is a curse of the western system which we adopted in Pakistan and also proves my above point and you endorsed it here.
If anyone on wrong path he will bear the blame/consequences none else ... if someone is doing something wrong; if you are forceful - prevent him forcefully; if not prevent him verbally and else feel it bad from the heart and that is the weakest level of faith. I believe in that.
There is no proof that will satisfy @AgNoStiC MuSliM if that is your intent to seek out such records.
I as an individual could not exercise this and you know it very well. The State of Pakistan has such responsibility.you can legislate freely to stop people with criminal records from Voting as part of punishment. does not mean feudals decide or panchayt decide where the community votes
So what we are doing since last 70 years? Again thing in resolutions are not worth till implementation. If you elect characterless corrupts/thieves, then this will be the outcome that after 70 years we are still having only assurances. But ground realities are as you said 'Saaf'? even 'Pani' is not assured.i am sure Pakistan can formulate an order if it wants.
I already told, as individual it is not my duty but the state of Pakistan. If in real there will be a Qazi the case could be taken to him.you must hold legitimate power entrusted by the state to forcefully stop them.
as a private Citizen you cannot do that but take your case to Qazi
I always get emotional by seeing this. The PM of Pakistan had such humble beginnings and can be called a true leader of the middle class strata.
Pictures like these are very common in middle class families in Pakistan mingling with secret societies and Order of Zion.
Inspirational !!
The so called khotay sikke of Quaid e Azam were the feudals who tragically became beneficial owners after his demise.
Objective Resolution ensures Pakistan will be ruled by Quran and Sunnah.
..... Feudalism in itself is corruption.
Let me remind you my friend that Objectives Resolution was brought forward after Jinnah's demise by those same Khotay Sikkes ... Prostitution of Islam for political ends by those beneficial owners post Jinnah.
But that corruption is protected by (political) Islam .... !!
The Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan declared in 1989 (PLD 1989 FSC-80) that Land Reforms were unIslamic !!
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/how-to-get-rid-of-pakistans-feudal-system.11445/page-4#post-9356614
In your zeal you should not forget to respect the religion. The only ones prostituted are the idiot followers of Mullahism.. Islam stands apart from this nonsense. It’s a distinction you shouldn’t forget . “Prostitution of Islam for political gains” implies the religion was subverted as well and has been subjugated to serve politics. I am amazed at the level of your stupidity. Refrain from spewing nonsense in your blind hate for the Objectives Resolution. I see it as a pattern on PDF. Every Tom Dick and Harry is an expert on why the Objectives Resolution fails us. On the contrary the OR was in line with the Quaids vision. And as Iqbal put it
On the contrary the OR was in line with the Quaids vision.
And as Iqbal put it
Jalal-E-Padshahi Ho K Jamhoori Tamasha Ho
Juda Ho Deen Siasat Se To Reh Jati Hai Changaizi
The guy has much more of a standing on politics and Islam than any keyboard warrior could ever muster. Lay back on attacking the foundations of Pakistan.
Let me remind you my friend that Objectives Resolution was brought forward after Jinnah's demise by those same Khotay Sikkes ... Prostitution of Islam for political ends by those beneficial owners post Jinnah.
But that corruption is protected by (political) Islam .... !!
The Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan declared in 1989 (PLD 1989 FSC-80) that Land Reforms were unIslamic !!
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/how-to-get-rid-of-pakistans-feudal-system.11445/page-4#post-9356614
Yes because all the founders were from the Order of Zion. Inspirational indeed.
And I am amazed at the level of your ignorance !!
Those are not my words... That's what the veteran Muslim League man and President of Pakistan Iskander Mirza had said about those Khotte Sikke ...
"For the last two years, I have been watching with deep anxiety, the ruthless struggle for power, corruption, the shameful exploitation of our simple, honest patriotic and industrious masses, the lack of decorum and the prostitution of Islam for political ends..... "
Agreed. Iqbal has a much greater of a standing on politics and Islam... and he categorically stated about secularism:
Islam as a religio-political system, no doubt, does permit such a view ..
Let that sink in![
Those specific types of reforms could have been deemed unislamic.
As for OR not complying with the Quaid’s vision because it declared Allah sovereign , read his speech and not Hindu lawmakers who obviously were opposed to OR.
Well, the main argument given by Mufti Muhammad Taqi Usmani of the Federal Shariat Court was that Islam had imposed no quantitative limit (ceiling) on land that can be owned by a person. The expropriation of land, or any property, by the state was declared un-Islamic (and therefore illegal) ..... You being a die hard supporter of Zia's Islamic Pakistan should be the last one to complain about Feudalism.
It was not just the Hindu law makers... The Non Muslims in the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan, The Chief Justice of Pakistan and the Ulema of Pakistan admitted that The Objectives Resolution was against the vision of Muhammad Ali Jinnah. Read the previous post carefully, try to understand/comprehend it, and then come back here to post a reply if you want to have any meaningful discussion.
you can legally buy as much land as you want. but to be entitled a piece of land is still up for debate.
It's not up for debate any longer. The Federal Shariat Court has already declared that the jagirs and lands granted by the British to their loyalists is "lawfully" acquired land....
And I don't agree, one should not be allowed to buy as much land as he wants