Implication of Lawlessness in Courts of Pakistan and Long Term Impact

[Norwegian]

Agree. This whole issue of why did the SC move so fast is moronic whining. When you so frivolously and massively violate the constitution, with mala fide intent, and then build upon it by making subsequent nullifiable actions to protect yourself from a vote that the SC previously opined must take place no later than the day... the SC had no choice but to intervene and no choice but to be on standby in case the wannabe fascist Immy tried to pull any other stunt.

Frankly, this whole thing kicked off on April 3rd. SC could have met and formed a bench that same day, ruled on it in EXACTLY the same way on the same day. Because it was that blatant of a violation, and because the way forward was singular and obvious. Only IK sycophants thought the move was legit or had any legal grounding, they were busy celebrating early.

So PTI delaying the NCM vote because of foreign interference is mala fide intent and gross violation of constitution. But a foreign power meeting ambassador of Pakistan, demanding NCM vote to succeed or else Pakistan would be isolated is a joking matter to you

NSC decides to issue strong demarche to unnamed country over 'threat letter'

Terms it "blatant interference in the internal affairs of Pakistan by the country in question".

www.dawn.com

 

[Jungibaaz]

Just because you can write long gibberish doesn't mean it's correct. PTI govt had no problem with NCM vote provided it happened entirely on its own organically within the country. The threatening letter from US had hinted it wasn't the case and a foreign power wanted NCM to succeed - something that was acknowledged in NSC meeting in the presence of entire security establishment of Pakistan.

NSC decides to issue strong demarche to unnamed country over 'threat letter'

Terms it "blatant interference in the internal affairs of Pakistan by the country in question".

www.dawn.com

Based on this PTI govt argued that NCM vote is malified because it has elements of foreign interference. Thus article 5 of the constitution of Pakistan was invoked to delay the vote pending inquiry of the said interference. There was no need to break the assembly even if NCM vote was adjourned by the speaker. This was a mistake

Long jibberish which is clearly beyond your ability to argue against. I've already addressed the fact that PTI's perception of foreign conspiracy does not give the Deputy Speaker the power to do what he did.

Address that or stop wasting your time with these replies.

@Jungibaaz

Brother you seem to have quite a bit of understanding of constitutional and legal matters.

Kindly advise which part of the constitution allows a foreign national and an absconder to attend state-level meetings where important national security-related matters and state secrets might be discussed?

Will SC take this case up themselves because of how much of a gross and egregious violation of the constitution and national security? or they won't take it up since it involves the sharif family?


View attachment 839540

Nepotism is a stain on the country, and PMLN are arguably the worst nepotistic retards in the country.

Not sure if any constitutional law is violated though. PTI should submit it to the SC if so.

 

[Norwegian]

I've already addressed the fact that PTI's perception of foreign conspiracy does not give the Deputy Speaker the power to do what he did.

Perception? What perception? NSC meeting where entire security establishment of Pakistan was present had also agreed with govt view that the demand from a foreign power to make NCM vote successful or face the consequences was blatant interference in internal affairs of Pakistan

NSC decides to issue strong demarche to unnamed country over 'threat letter'

Terms it "blatant interference in the internal affairs of Pakistan by the country in question".

www.dawn.com

 

[Black.Mamba]

Nepotism is a stain on the country, and PMLN are arguably the worst nepotistic retards in the country.

Not sure if any constitutional law is violated though. PTI should submit it to the SC if so.

This is not just a case of simple Nepotism we are talking state level secrets here. I am no legal expert but little research points me towards the Official secrets act.

The British national in this case is clearly categorized as a "foreign agent" for all we know he might be working for MI6 or RAW or both. As per the law anyone who enabled him to be part of official state meetings is subject to 14 years imprisonment, since courts these days are actively defending the state and interest of Pakistan they should take a sou moto on this one, and they do not need to open at midnight, taking up at day time will be sufficient enough.

After all watching interest of Pakistan is not a sole responsability of PTI other neturon and protons should also take part.

 

[ghazi52]

.,.,
The sighting of Eid moon will be announced by SC..

 

[Black.Mamba]

.,.,
The sighting of Eid moon will be announced by SC..


View attachment 839574

کل عید منانا ہے تو شریف فیملی سے ہائی کورٹ میں پٹیشن دائر کرنے کو کہیں۔