Imperial America's Next Target India

[praveen]

The US survival depends upon the other countries as its prey...no matter what country is that ...either India , Pak, Iran, or any other country it finds and falls into as its prey....like a big fish which feeds itself on small fish ..if there is no small fish left ...it gonna die itself....same is the case with US ...its gone crazy to eat any country in order to survive....

Law of the fish

 

[Urbanized Greyhound]

Iam saying most of the mutiny was in bihar,awadh and delhi and after the mutiny
the brits culled

You are right on most points

, awadh(oudh) --noted for Khuswant Singh , Begum Hazrat mahal , Rani Laxmibai etc Kanpur , Meerut etc

Delhi -- Bahadur Shah Zafar

Marathas- Tantya Tope and Nana Saheb etc

however Bihar fell within the Bengal constituency then ...... The revolt started with the Sepoys at Barrackpore in the Bengal province...

 

[Roybot]

wiki says - Critics of this theory state that the Indian rebellion of 1857 may have played a role in reinforcing the
British belief in 'martial races'. During this event some Indian troops (known as 'Sepoys'), particularly in Bengal, mutinied, but the loyal Pathans, Punjabis,
Gurkhas, Kumaoni/Kumaunis and Garhwalis did not join the mutiny and fought on the side of the British Army. From then on, this theory was used to the hilt to accelerate recruitment from among these 'races', whilst discouraging enlistment of 'disloyal' Bengalis

You do realise that erstwhile Bengal didn't just comprise of Bengalis don't you?

 

[below_freezing]

China's rise undisputed. India's rise subject to other's mercy.

China's rise was subject to others mercy in the 80's and early 90's too. India, if it survives 5 more years, will probably also gain the critical momentum.

 

[praveen]

Beharis==Bangladeshis what feather brained logic we have here

 

[asad71]

everyone with a circumscised dick in chandini chowk such was brutality.Modern day Bangladesh was too backward at that time to even take recruit7

You have gone off topic. But to add to your fascination for circumcision, please note that Sanjay, whom you know as Indira's younger son, was circumcised by his biological/real dad, Mohammad Yunus.

 

[praveen]

You have gone off topic. But to add to your fascination for circumcision, please note that Sanjay, whom you know as Indira's younger son, was circumcised by his biological/real dad, Mohammad Yunus.

Who cares??

 

[The_Sidewinder]

Fun unlimited....keep going son...great job
I hope u can teach us a great deal. I m really terrified.
You can have beer from my side. MOD please dnt close the thread. You know what i mean.

 

[Interpreter]

I have to admit that I've known it's funny before I view the thread but I still can't help catching a glimpse of the content .

 

[asad71]

1. After the "killing" of OBL, why suddenly Al Qaeda has vanished from the media?

2. Watch and watch closely how Imperial America woos Mulla Omar/Afghan Talibans.

3. Watch how carefully and with energy America is building up Afghan mily.

4. Withdrawing from Afghanistan had been declared, but now with PA, ISI and TTP coming closer and closer in their rage on America, Americans are withdrawing from Pakistan also.

5. Indo-US relations seems to have taken a curiously cool turn. The drumming up of an alliance between 2xgreat democracies has gone backstage.

6. An withdrawal of USA from her adventure in this region will bring the Pak Afghan brothers closer with Mulla Omar as the Afghan Amir ul Mominin. Imagine what will happen in due course of time when Pak Afghan gathers restless energy?

 

[asad71]

Americas Next Target: Indian military bases

A classified report commissioned by the United States Department of Defense, states that the country wants access to Indian bases and military infrastructure with the United States Air Force specifically desiring the establishment of airbases in India.


The report on the future of Indo-US military relations, being distributed among decision-makers in the United States and made available to a handful of senior members of the Indian government, also speaks of the USAF's desire for 'having access closer to areas of instability'. "American military officers are candid in their plans to eventually seek access to Indian bases and military infrastructure. India's strategic location in the centre of Asia, astride the frequently traveled Sea Lanes of Communication (SLOC) linking the Middle East and East Asia, makes India particularly attractive to the US military," the report says. The report can be distributed only with the permission of Director, Net Assessment, Office of the Secretary of Defence. The report is the most comprehensive picture of American perspective of its military relation with India and its future aspirations. To some extent it also uncovers Indian military thinking vis-à-vis the US. It has quoted US lieutenant generals as saying that the access to India bases would enable the US military 'to be able to touch the rest of the world' and to 'respond rapidly to regional crises'.


The report, prepared by Juli A MacDonald, an associate at Booz Allen Hamilton, for the department of defence, is based on interviews of 42 key Americans, including 23 active military officers, 15 government officials and four others. In India MacDonald met 10 active Indian military officers and five government officials besides several members of the National Security Council, and outside experts advising the government. For understandable reasons, none of the individuals are identified by name, but by their ranks or other positions. The report points out that many American military planners are thinking about 'different sets of allies and friends for addressing a future strategic environment in Asia that may be dramatically different from today'. "For many, India is the most attractive alternative. For this reasons, several Americans underscored that eventual access to Indian military infrastructure represents a critical 'strategic hedge' against dramatic changes in traditional US relationships in Asia," the report says.


A South Asia Foreign Area Officer of the US state department has been quoted as saying that India's strategic importance increases if existing US relationships and arrangements in Asia fails. He cites three key possibilities for that: If US relations with other traditional allies (eg Japan, South Korea and Saudi Arabia) becomes more acrimonious or politically uncomfortable for both parties; or if access rights that the United States takes for granted become more restrictive; or if our traditional relationships collapse resulting in a US military withdrawal. The FAO, who is specialises on South Asia and among those few American diplomats who can converse in Hindi, says, "The United States needs to develop alternatives in Asia. India is the optimal choice if we can overcome the obstacles in building the relationship."


An American Colonel says, "The US Navy wants a relatively neutral territory on the opposite side of the world that can provide ports and support for operations in the Middle East. India not only has a good infrastructure, the Indian Navy has proved that it can fix and fuel US ships. Over time, port visits must become a natural event. India is a viable player in supporting all naval missions, including escorting and responding to regional crises. In the same vein, the US Air Force would like the Indians to be able to grant them access to bases and landing rights during operations, such as counter-terrorism and heavy airlift support." It is significant that during the 1991 Gulf War-I, India provided refuelling facility to US warplanes. And during Operation Enduring Freedom, several US warships used Indian facilities for rest and recuperation. As part of Operation Enduring Freedom, Indian naval ships provided escorts to merchant vessels from North Arabian Sea till Strait of Malacca in the most active cooperation with US navy in history. In fact, it is in naval cooperation that America sees the immediate future of Indo-US military relations. It is not just access to bases and ports that the US military hopes to get in India, but also training facilities in India.


A common theme among high-ranking American officers is that the US military would benefit from training with Indians, particularly if the training could occur on Indian territory. "India has a variety of landscapes, from ice-clad mountains to deserts, and it would help the Americans because military training ranges shrinking and becoming increasingly controversial in the United States," the report says. And for the US navy training with Indian navy is the best way to become 'proficient in the Indian Ocean region', the report adds. The American decision-makers 'believe that the military relationship should result in shared technology and capabilities, and ultimately they would like to be able to respond jointly to regional crises'.


Such American dreams are sure to set off significant political resentment as it would offset India's long held tradition of non-alignment, especially its military neutrality. In real terms it would indicates how India, thrust strategically into the Indian Ocean, could emerge as America's key ally in Asia as the continent goes through a historic political churning.

===========
That's an old report. But that is how Imperial America operates. Take your time. An example is Pakistan, although there are no shortage of these.

 

[EjazR]

1. Well, who knows? The last conqueror of N India was the Bengal Army under the English Co. Before that it was our hero and monarch Sher Shah Suri.

2. But do please read the posts before embarking on childish comments. IA's Paddy has been a highly respected intellectual in your country - not merely in the mily.

Sher Shah Suri was a 4th generation Bihari Afghan. He was born in the Rohtas district in Bihar. Even today his masoleum lies in Bihar. So you should say that Biharis conquered Bengal really. Or more accurately, Afghan origin Biharis.

just another example of your twisted sense of history. Let me help you, what you posted was a SATIRE. It is making fun of the neocons who are a well known to have half baked ideas that eventually got them into the mess in Iraq instead of focussing on Af- Pak region. The article is indirectly making fun of the neocons.

 

[Zabaniyah]

*sigh*

I am sorry, but I just read 5 pages of garbage.

1. India is linked to al-Qaida because its prime minister looks like Osama bin Laden. Actually, Osama is hiding in India in the garb of a Sikh, and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is protecting him in his home state Punjab. Also, India is a logical choice because its name starts with "I" and the world cannot accuse us of invading only Muslim countries.

OBL died 2 months ago in Pakistan. How does "I" set a criteria for the US to invade other countries? How does wearing a turban have to do with being a terrorist?

2. India has weapons of mass destruction and is a constant threat to our key ally Pakistan. Pakistan's WMD are now benign because A.Q. Khan is under house arrest and can no longer indulge in nuclear proliferation.

Pakistan is a US ally, but not a trusted one. Are you aware of the comments made by A.Q Khan in regards to the 1971 Liberation war? But then, who cares?

3. India falsely accuses Pakistan of cross-border terrorism. We cannot believe India because Pakistan, a model democracy, is fighting the war on terrorism with us.

India is the world's largest democracy. Sure it's not perfect, but it is still a democracy. Does the Mumbai hotel raid ring any bells? At least, apparently?

4. India boasts the largest democracy in the world. Actually, their democracy is phony. They have too many political parties and their parliament is in perpetual pandemonium. We must teach them real democracy and the virtues of a civilized two-party system.

Since when did the USA lecture present-day India on democracy?

5. Communists have ruled two of India's states, West Bengal and Kerala, for decades and successive Indian governments in New Delhi have done nothing to ban the Communist party. India is a socialist country, and it always supported the Soviet Union in the United Nations in the cold war era.

Commies lost the WB election. Anyways, they don't call any shots in the global political stage.

The Cold War ended 20 years ago. Explain the American offers of military equipment to India? C-17s? C-130s? F-16s and F-18s on offer in the recent MMRCA event? The P-8Is? EXPLAIN.

6. Women in India are not free; they still wear saris and put bindis on their foreheads. India is a weird country — Hindus believe in many gods and reincarnation. They worship cows and don't eat beef. Civilization has not reached there yet.

What!? WTF?! Women in Bangladesh wear saris. Always there during weddings and special occasions. Does that make them 'uncivilized'? Hindus don't 'worship' cows. They respect them because they do a lot of work in farming.

7. India is now charging us more than the minimum U.S. wages for the outsourced programming jobs. How can we contain inflation in the United States if the Indians wildly increase their labor costs?

So? I don't recall the US suffering from hyper-inflation.

8. The Indian government is very slow in privatizing the public sector. The government is still in the business of running steel, oil, defense, insurance and banking industries. They are not opening up these industries fast enough for the American companies to invest.

Your point being? I think your knowledge in business and economics is very limited.

9. Government jobs and college admissions are doled out based on the caste system in India. People of color in the USA are demanding the same treatment here in the name of affirmative action.

Since when? India boasts some of the best business schools in Asia. Are their any signs of racial and caste discrimination in those institutions? Those institutions have facilities overseas as well.

10. India has a bad influence on our Western culture: yoga is spreading like a wild fire and the Americans are increasingly using Sanskrit words such as pundit, guru and mantra to show off their vocabulary prowess.

So? Different cultures come and go in America. Your point being?

Shukla of Shoreview, Minnesota immigrated to the United States from India. He is a real estate agent and retired engineer.

Question: Is there any such thing as Imperial America? Does the USA have a king or monarch or something? I think Jignostic is a more appropriate term. But then, there are better things to celebrate in life.

The article is indirectly making fun of the neocons.

That makes more sense. Probably a comical article intended as a joke at best.

 

[blackops]

lol yeah sure am hacking cia data right now

 

[Mo12]

[That's an old report. But that is how Imperial America operates. Take your time. An example is Pakistan, although there are no shortage of these.

Im sure India will learn from Pakistan and USA relationship, by not getting to close to USA, as it may start great but can turn sour when USA will started demanding stuff.