If Yemen was 100 people

[StormBreaker]

You state something and you put it in the tongue of someone else, what kind of logic is yours???

No one is rushing you to post, think before writing, don't write "Persians", then correct it by "governments", also why still choosing the word "destroying" ??? Why insisting in linking Islam and the word Destroy????

You can hate Iranians all you want, tell them names night and day, but please don't bring islam in your hate or racism or whatever your problem is.

Why should I hate Iranians ? They are cool and nice people, Much like Arabs.

It’s the scumbag government of Iran that is the center of devils play

 

[SalarHaqq]

The leaders of the Gulf Arab states and Iran will burn in hell for what they have done in Yemen.

The only solution is a ceasefire, followed by a unity government and then election in 5-10 years time.

Both Iran and the Gulf Arabs are equally guilty of turning a civil war into a long drawn our sectarian based proxy conflict. They did the same in Syria.

To Iran, it's not a sectarian war. Neither was the one in Syria. If you listen to Iran's discourse and explore the viewpoint of Iranian officials, there's no sectarianism in it.

And when examining facts on the ground, we can only reach the same conclusion: these conflicts aren't of a sectarian nature but strictly political.

- - - - -

I will assume you genuinely are not aware, i advise you read into the teachings of your mullas

one tiny small example , did you know they curse the wife of the Prophet mohammed, Aisha ? and accuse her of the worst things.

how does this sit with you ?

thank you for proving my point

It outright disproves your assumption, actually.

Look at what the user rightly posted: a fatwa by Iran's Supreme Leader ayatollah Khamenei prohibiting any slander against figures revered by Sunni Muslims, in particular the Prophet's (s) wife Aisha. It's very unambiguous.

Ayatollah Khamenei’s fatwa: Insulting the Mother of the Faithful Aisha is prohibited

english.khamenei.ir

- - - - -

A Sahih Hadith was posted, you quoted " the Hadith is from Iranian website", meaning that the Hadith isn't correct.

You can discuss the meaning the Hadith, the context, the intentions, .... but not refute it because it's from a Iranian Site.

The rest of your reply is complete non sense, sorry for being Frank

In realiy, that's not even an Iranian site. I browsed it, it has pages written in Indic script and I couldn't find anything suggesting it's based in Iran.

 

[Maula Jatt]

To Iran, it's not a sectarian war. Neither was the one in Syria. If you listen to Iran's discourse and explore the viewpoint of Iranian officials, there's no sectarianism in it.

And when examining facts on the ground, we can only reach the same conclusion: these conflicts aren't of a sectarian nature but strictly political.

- - - - -




It outright disproves your assumption, actually.

Look at what the user rightly posted: a fatwa by Iran's Supreme Leader ayatollah Khamenei prohibiting any slander against figures revered by Sunni Muslims, in particular the Prophet's (s) wife Aisha. It's very unambiguous.

Ayatollah Khamenei’s fatwa: Insulting the Mother of the Faithful Aisha is prohibited

english.khamenei.ir

- - - - -



In realiy, that's not even an Iranian site. I browsed it, it has pages written in Indic script and I couldn't find anything suggesting it's based in Iran.

Hindi website probably for Indian Muslims

 

[Abu Dhabi]

I copied the Hadith from that site

very good, if you also read the explanation under the hadith you copy/pasted , it will make a while lot more sense. This way, the Hadith wont be thrown around left and right because it is misunderstood

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

@WebMaster @The Eagle @waz perma ban.

First the Prophet’s wife and now Umar ra

He definitely deserves a ban.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Just because the Arab countries got involved in the civil war before you, doesn't mean that your involvements becomes justified.

we didn't provided anything to bomb the civilian, Arab countries bomb civilian and put them under the siege . if you don't see the difference have nothing to add

 

[Hack-Hook]

@WebMaster @The Eagle @waz perma ban.

First the Prophet’s wife and now Umar ra

the mods knew when some people begin to speaks nonsense we bring out that story stop posting nonsense we don't mention it

Persians have always been against Arabs ever since Umar RA destroyed them

A Tunisian rafidhi? That is unrealistic unless you are wearing a false flag

Twelvers Shism..... I am confident no such Tunisian exist

and these guys call us sectarian

Apparently yes for Irani mindset, Given that Iran’s vengeance has got to do with their hates against Arabs and the conquests of Arabs over persians.

As for me, The victories were for islam and not for Arabs. The battles were fought with honor and civil code. The governments were destroyed

go read history we defeated omavide army, then we defeated Abbasside army in Abbasside civil war then Ale-buyed defeated Abbasside army and Abbasside caliph had to be ratified by them and at last we made Mongol general attack Baghdad and destroy Abbasside dynasty for good while he was afraid to do so.
how many times we must destroy arab armies so you guys understand if we wanted to take revenge it has been taken centuries ago