What's new

If Yemen was 100 people

Status
Not open for further replies.
Are you refuting Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim ??

You won't accept Prophet Hadith??

عَنْ ابْنِ عُمَرَ رضي الله عنهما قَالَ : ( اللَّهُمَّ بَارِكْ لَنَا فِي شَأْمِنَا وفِي يَمَنِنَا . قَالُوا : وَفِي نَجْدِنَا ؟ قَالَ : اللَّهُمَّ بَارِكْ لَنَا فِي شَأْمِنَا وفِي يَمَنِنَا . قَالُوا : وَفِي نَجْدِنَا ؟ قَالَ : هُنَاكَ الزَّلاَزِلُ وَالْفِتَنُ ، وَبِهَا يَطْلُعُ قَرْنُ الشَّيْطَانِ ) رواه البخاري (1037) ومسلم (2905)

read brother , read ......


Yes Iran is bombing Syria and Yemen 24/7/365 with Jewish weapons and silence of UN circus.


No one in Iran openly insults Ayesha despite she was sworn enemy of Imam Ali (AS).

Accourding to Quran many wives of prophets were against them and finally betrayed them. Like wives of Prophets Noah, Loot and Jacob (A).

إستغفر الله العلي العظيم
 
.
I will assume you genuinely are not aware, i advise you read into the teachings of your mullas

one tiny small example , did you know they curse the wife of the Prophet mohammed, Aisha ? and accuse her of the worst things.

how does this sit with you ?
I know that Imam Khomeni and many Shie Scholars have banned such a thing, maybe extremist would do that but not a true Shia as follower of Ali (as) whom escorted Aisha to her house with 40 women as her gaurds despite waging war against him, killing innocent people and causing rift in Ummah.
The problem over here ain't me being aware or not but sheer volume of stupidity considering Shia whom share the same Qible, Book, Prophet , love of Household and true Sahabe infidels ....

A story:

In the time of Sheikh Mufidah, one of the great Sunni scholars Qazi Abdul Jabbar had a lecture in Baghdad ,. One day, Qazi was sitting in his lecture hall. His students were Sunnis and Shiites. On that day, Sheikh Mofid (RA) also entered that assembly & sat next to the door, the judge that had not seen him until that day, but he had heard his description. After a moment, Sheikh Mofid turned to the judge and said, "Will you allow me to ask you a question in the presence of these scientists?"
Judge: Ask
Sheikh Mufid: This is a hadith narrated by the Shiites that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said in the desert of Ghadir about Ali (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him):
«مَن كْنْتُ مُوْلاُ فَعَلِيٌ مَوْلَهُ: Whoever I am the master of, then Ali is his master»
Is this hadith correct or is it fabricated by the Shiites?
Judge: This narration is correct.
Sheikh Mofid: What is the meaning of the word "Molly" in this narration?
Judge: The meaning is leadership and priority.
Sheikh Mufid: If this is the case, then according to what the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said, ‌ Ali (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) has lordship and priority over others, so what are all these differences and animosities between Shiites and Sunnis?
Judge: Brother! This hadith (Ghadir) is a narration (and the narrated material), but the caliphate of Abu Bakr is "tact" and it is a certain thing, and a wise person does not leave wisdom because of a narration !!
Sheikh Mofid: What do you say about this hadith that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said in the honor of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him):
"O Ali! "Your war is my war, and your peace is my peace."
Judge: This hadith is correct.
Sheikh Mufid: Therefore, those who waged Jamal war, such as Talha, Zubair, Aisha, etc., and fought with Ali (as), according to the above hadith and your confession to its authenticity, (have fought with the person of the Messenger of God, peace be upon him) and are infidels.
Judge: Brother! They (Talha, Zubair, etc.) repented.
Sheikh Mofid: those wars are tact and certainty, but the fact that the creators of the wars have repented is narrated and heard, and according to you, wisdom should not be sacrificed for narration, and a wise man does not leave wisdom for the sake of narration.
In response to this question, the judge raised his head after an hour and said, "Who are you?"
Sheikh Mufid: I am your servant Muhammad ibn Muhammad ibn Nu'man. The judge immediately stood up and took the hand of Sheikh Mufid and put it in its place and said to him: "You are really useful": "You are in fact useful (beneficial)" The scholars of the Majlis were upset with the judge's behavior and made a fuss. The judge said to them: I was helpless in response to this (useful) sheikh if you can respond him, Nobody had any response , so Sheikh Mofid won, and the title "Mofid" in this parliament fell on the tongues of the people.
 
.
That hadith has got nothing to do with what I said.

The Iranian propaganda and the so called “Wahabbi Extremism”, It’s an iranian induced filth on media.

Arabs are too secular to be extremist and their pillars of faith are too strong and straight to be extremist unlike filthy Iranian diplomacy
A Sahih Hadith was posted, you quoted " the Hadith is from Iranian website", meaning that the Hadith isn't correct.

You can discuss the meaning the Hadith, the context, the intentions, .... but not refute it because it's from a Iranian Site.

The rest of your reply is complete non sense, sorry for being Frank ✌️
 
.
A Sahih Hadith was posted, you quoted " the Hadith is from Iranian website", meaning that the Hadith isn't correct.

You can discuss the meaning the Hadith, the context, the intentions, .... but not refute it because it's from a Iranian Site.

The rest of your reply is complete non sense, sorry for being Frank ✌️
Good luck trying to divert the topic and purposefully ignoring my statements.

Not obliged to give clarifications to anyone as well.

I have known this hadith for 12 years atleast. But that doesn’t change my views on the content written after hadith.
 
. . . . . .
I know that Imam Khomeni and many Shie Scholars have banned such a thing, maybe extremist would do that but not a true Shia as follower of Ali (as) whom escorted Aisha to her house with 40 women as her gaurds despite waging war against him, killing innocent people and causing rift in Ummah.
The problem over here ain't me being aware or not but sheer volume of stupidity considering Shia whom share the same Qible, Book, Prophet , love of Household and true Sahabe infidels ....

A story:

In the time of Sheikh Mufidah, one of the great Sunni scholars Qazi Abdul Jabbar had a lecture in Baghdad ,. One day, Qazi was sitting in his lecture hall. His students were Sunnis and Shiites. On that day, Sheikh Mofid (RA) also entered that assembly & sat next to the door, the judge that had not seen him until that day, but he had heard his description. After a moment, Sheikh Mofid turned to the judge and said, "Will you allow me to ask you a question in the presence of these scientists?"
Judge: Ask
Sheikh Mufid: This is a hadith narrated by the Shiites that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said in the desert of Ghadir about Ali (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him):
«مَن كْنْتُ مُوْلاُ فَعَلِيٌ مَوْلَهُ: Whoever I am the master of, then Ali is his master»
Is this hadith correct or is it fabricated by the Shiites?
Judge: This narration is correct.
Sheikh Mofid: What is the meaning of the word "Molly" in this narration?
Judge: The meaning is leadership and priority.
Sheikh Mufid: If this is the case, then according to what the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said, ‌ Ali (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) has lordship and priority over others, so what are all these differences and animosities between Shiites and Sunnis?
Judge: Brother! This hadith (Ghadir) is a narration (and the narrated material), but the caliphate of Abu Bakr is "tact" and it is a certain thing, and a wise person does not leave wisdom because of a narration !!
Sheikh Mofid: What do you say about this hadith that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said in the honor of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him):
"O Ali! "Your war is my war, and your peace is my peace."
Judge: This hadith is correct.
Sheikh Mufid: Therefore, those who waged Jamal war, such as Talha, Zubair, Aisha, etc., and fought with Ali (as), according to the above hadith and your confession to its authenticity, (have fought with the person of the Messenger of God, peace be upon him) and are infidels.
Judge: Brother! They (Talha, Zubair, etc.) repented.
Sheikh Mofid: those wars are tact and certainty, but the fact that the creators of the wars have repented is narrated and heard, and according to you, wisdom should not be sacrificed for narration, and a wise man does not leave wisdom for the sake of narration.
In response to this question, the judge raised his head after an hour and said, "Who are you?"
Sheikh Mufid: I am your servant Muhammad ibn Muhammad ibn Nu'man. The judge immediately stood up and took the hand of Sheikh Mufid and put it in its place and said to him: "You are really useful": "You are in fact useful (beneficial)" The scholars of the Majlis were upset with the judge's behavior and made a fuss. The judge said to them: I was helpless in response to this (useful) sheikh if you can respond him, Nobody had any response , so Sheikh Mofid won, and the title "Mofid" in this parliament fell on the tongues of the people.

"Sheikh Mufid: Therefore, those who waged Jamal war, such as Talha, Zubair, Aisha, etc., and fought with Ali (as), according to the above hadith and your confession to its authenticity, (have fought with the person of the Messenger of God, peace be upon him) and are infidels."

Let me ask you how this statement that you quoted is reconcilable with this verse Al-Ahzab 33:6 in the Holy Qur'an (attached to this comment)?

Here is the Saheeh International of the verse Al-Ahzab 33:6:

"Surely the Prophet has a greater claim over the believers than they have over each other,1 and his wives are their mothers.2 According to the Book of Allah, blood relatives have greater claim over each other than the rest of the believers and the Emigrants (in the cause of Allah), except that you may do some good to your allies (if you so wish).3 This is inscribed in the Book of Allah."

We have the words of Allah (subhaana wa ta'aalla) who confirmed to us the status of the wives of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah (swt) be upon him) - who are our (Muslims) mothers. Therefore, the declaration that you quoted from Sheikh Mufid is bogus and should be discarded. His interpretation was wrong.

What happened between Muslims who fought amongst themselves during the imamate of Ali Bin Abu Talib (ra) was an internal civil war. We don't know their reasoning. Umm Aisha (ra) is our mother. She did a lot for Islam. Therefore, we can't rely on fabricated or wrong interpretations of that event that maligns the wives of the Prophet (saw), who are our mothers. Allah (swt) is the ultimate judge and we should leave that to him on what transpired during the internal civil war between Muslims.
 

Attachments

  • Al-Ahzab_33_6.PNG
    Al-Ahzab_33_6.PNG
    53.4 KB · Views: 39
Last edited:
.
Twelvers Shism..... I am confident no such Tunisian exist
Dunno about other Tunisian, but I'm not.

The idea of imama is interesting from a theological point of view, but keeping it in Ahl Al bayt (with all the due respect) only, isn't acceptable from "my" point of view, I can be misjudgeing....


I did a rapid search for you, yes we have Shias in Tunisia 😁

 
.
Dunno about other Tunisian, but I'm not.

The idea of imama is interesting from a theological point of view, but keeping it in Ahl Al bayt (with all the due respect) only, isn't acceptable from "my" point of view, I can be misjudgeing....


I did a rapid search for you, yes we have Shias in Tunisia 😁

It is less then 0.1%

 
. .
الفتوحات الاسلامية اصبحت تدمير أوطان؟؟؟ ما شاء الله !!!
Apparently yes for Irani mindset, Given that Iran’s vengeance has got to do with their hates against Arabs and the conquests of Arabs over persians.

As for me, The victories were for islam and not for Arabs. The battles were fought with honor and civil code. The governments were destroyed
 
.
Apparently yes for Irani mindset, Given that Iran’s vengeance has got to do with their hates against Arabs and the conquests of Arabs over persians.

As for me, The victories were for islam and not for Arabs. The battles were fought with honor and civil code. The governments were destroyed
You state something and you put it in the tongue of someone else, what kind of logic is yours???

No one is rushing you to post, think before writing, don't write "Persians", then correct it by "governments", also why still choosing the word "destroying" ??? Why insisting in linking Islam and the word Destroy????

You can hate Iranians all you want, tell them names night and day, but please don't bring islam in your hate or racism or whatever your problem is.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom