If the us invades iran...?

[Ahmad]

They are not wiped, on contrary, they are rapidly growing.

in the form of illegal settlements?

 

[GentlemanObserver]

They are not wiped, on contrary, they are rapidly growing.

Pre 1947:

And then....

You were saying?

 

[The Clarifier]

They are rapidly growing.

lol

 

[500]

in the form of illegal settlements?

In form of population and quality life standards.

1880 - 400 K Arabs in Palestine
1947 - 1.3 mln Arabs in Palestine
2010 - over 5 mln Arabs in Palestine

And then....

You were saying?

This map is false. There were not any "Palestinian territories" in 1947or 1967. It was British mandate and later occupied by Jordan and Egypt. Here correct map:

 

[LAKHNAVI]

nothing, why should I?
If a bunch of illeterate Taliban with underwear on their heads can defend their land, so can we.
We already did actually. The 8 year war against Iraq was actually against the entire planet. Some say the contra affair was help to Iran from the US and the only answer to that is lol
That deal was worth less than 100 million. Compare that to the hundreds of billions the Iraqis got from all over the planet. French pilots were piloting Iraqi jets even!!

anyways, Iran will never in a trillion years be attacked.
They didn't attack us when we had hundreds of their politicians hostage for over a year. They didn't attack when we started our nuke program. They didn't attack when our first nuclear plant was finished. They didn't attack when we captured those British sailors. They didn't attack when we created Hezbollah etc...
Why would they attack when their country is weaker and ours is stronger than what it was in the past???

Iran is a fortress not because of its weapons, but because of its nationalistic people and that's why we will never be touched. When we ran out of minesweepers and artillery we were walking over mines. People tied grenades around their wastes and went under Iraqi tanks.
we will do it again if we have to.

Adil please replace ''attack'' with ''punish'' and your post will be completly accurate.

 

[GentlemanObserver]

In form of population and quality life standards.

1880 - 400 K Arabs in Palestine
1947 - 1.3 mln Arabs in Palestine
2010 - over 5 mln Arabs in Palestine


This map is false. There were not any "Palestinian territories" in 1947or 1967. It was British mandate and later occupied by Jordan and Egypt. Here correct map:

Nakba Day - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please keep your ill informed nonsense to yourself please.
FYI: Here are the UN Resolutions on Israel Pertaining on Palestine:

Resolution 42: The Palestine Question (5 March 1948) Requests recommendations for the Palestine Commission
Resolution 43: The Palestine Question (1 Apr 1948) Recognizes "increasing violence and disorder in Palestine" and requests that representatives of "the Jewish Agency for Palestine and the Arab Higher Committee" arrange, with the Security Council, "a truce between the Arab and Jewish Communities of Palestine...Calls upon Arab and Jewish armed groups in Palestine to cease acts of violence immediately."
Resolution 44: The Palestine Question (1 Apr 1948) Requests convocation of special session of the General Assembly
Resolution 46: The Palestine Question (17 Apr 1948) As the United Kingdom is the Mandatory Power, "it is responsible for the maintenance of peace and order in Palestine." The Resolutions also "Calls upon all persons and organizations in Palestine" to stop importing "armed bands and fighting personnel...whatever their origin;...weapons and war materials;...Refrain, pending the future government of Palestine...from any political activity which might prejudice the rights, claims, or position of either community;...refrain from any action which will endager the safety of the Holy Places in Palestine."
Resolution 48: The Palestine Question (23 Apr 1948)
Resolution 49: The Palestine Question (22 May 1948)
Resolution 50: The Palestine Question (29 May 1948)
Resolution 53: The Palestine Question (7 Jul 1948)
Resolution 54: The Palestine Question (15 Jul 1948)
Resolution 56: The Palestine Question (19 Aug 1948)
Resolution 57: The Palestine Question (18 Sep 1948)
Resolution 59: The Palestine Question (19 Oct 1948)
Resolution 60: The Palestine Question (29 Oct 1948)
Resolution 61: The Palestine Question (4 Nov 1948)
Resolution 62: The Palestine Question (16 Nov 1948)
Resolution 66: The Palestine Question (29 Dec 1948)
Resolution 72: The Palestine Question (11 Aug 1949)
Resolution 73: The Palestine Question (11 Aug 1949)
Resolution 89 (17 November 1950): regarding Armistice in 1948 Arab-Israeli War and "transfer of persons".
Resolution 92: The Palestine Question (8 May 1951)
Resolution 93: The Palestine Question (18 May 1951)
Resolution 95: The Palestine Question (1 Sep 1951)
Resolution 100: The Palestine Question (27 Oct 1953)
Resolution 101: The Palestine Question (24 Nov 1953)
Resolution 106: The Palestine Question (29 Mar 1955) 'condemns' Israel for Gaza raid.
Resolution 107: The Palestine Question (30 March)
Resolution 108: The Palestine Question (8 September)
Resolution 111: The Palestine Question (January 19, 1956) " ... 'condemns' Israel for raid on Syria that killed fifty-six people".
Resolution 113: The Palestine Question (4 April)
Resolution 114: The Palestine Question (4 June)
Resolution 127: The Palestine Question (January 22, 1958) " ... 'recommends' Israel suspends its 'no-man's zone' in Jerusalem".
Resolution 138: (June 23, 1960) Question relating to the case of Adolf Eichmann, concerning Argentine complaint that Israel breached its sovereignty.
Resolution 162: The Palestine Question (April 11, 1961) " ... 'urges' Israel to comply with UN decisions".
Resolution 171: The Palestine Question (April 9, 1962) " ... determines flagrant violations' by Israel in its attack on Syria".
Resolution 228: The Palestine Question (November 25, 1966) " ... 'censures' Israel for its attack on Samu in the West Bank, then under Jordanian control".
Resolution 592: " ... 'strongly deplores' the killing of Palestinian students at Bir Zeit University by Israeli troops".
Resolution 594
Resolution 596
Resolution 599
Resolution 603
Resolution 605: " ... 'strongly deplores' Israel's policies and practices denying the human rights of Palestinians.
Resolution 607: " ... 'calls' on Israel not to deport Palestinians and strongly requests it to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention.
Resolution 608: " ... 'deeply regrets' that Israel has defied the United Nations and deported Palestinian civilians".
Resolution 609
Resolution 611
Resolution 613
Resolution 617
Resolution 624
Resolution 630
Resolution 633
Resolution 636: " ... 'deeply regrets' Israeli deportation of Palestinian civilians.
Resolution 639 (31 Jul 1989)
Resolution 641 (30 Aug 1989): " ... 'deplores' Israel's continuing deportation of Palestinians.
Resolution 672 (12 Oct 1990): " ... 'condemns' Israel for "violence against Palestinians" at the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount.
Resolution 673 (24 Oct 1990): " ... 'deplores' Israel's refusal to cooperate with the United Nations.
Resolution 679 (30 Nov 1990)
Resolution 681 (20 Dec 1990): " ... 'deplores' Israel's resumption of the deportation of Palestinians.
Resolution 684 (30 Jan 1991)
Resolution 694 (24 May 1991): " ... 'deplores' Israel's deportation of Palestinians and calls on it to ensure their safe and immediate return.
Resolution 695 (30 May 1991)
Resolution 701 (31 Jul 1991)
Resolution 722 (29 Nov 1991)
Resolution 726 (06 Jan 1992): " ... 'strongly condemns' Israel's deportation of Palestinians.
Resolution 734 (29 Jan 1992)
Resolution 756 (29 May 1992)
Resolution 768 (30 Jul 1992)
Resolution 790 (25 Nov 1992)
Resolution 799 (18 Dec 1992): ". . . 'strongly condemns' Israel's deportation of 413 Palestinians and calls for their immediate return.
Resolution 803 (28 Jan 1993)
Resolution 830 (26 May 1993)
Resolution 852 (28 Jul 1993)
Resolution 887 (29 Nov 1993)
Resolution 895 (28 Jan 1994)
Resolution 1397 (12 Mar 2002) the first resolution to explicitly call for a two-state solution.
Resolution 1435 (24 Sep 2002) called for an end to Israeli measures in and around Ramallah.

 

[Pasban]

Let me refresh your memory:

The text posted on the image in incorrect. There is no such quotation made by Ruhollah Khomeini.

That's lie.

Allow me as well to refresh your memory...

Peres says that Iran 'can also be wiped off the map' - DominicanToday.com

Also...

The Jerusalem Post Acknowledges "Wiped off the Map" Misquote on Israel by Iran

 

[500]

The text posted on the image in incorrect. There is no such quotation made by Ruhollah Khomeini.

Thats what Iranians wrote not me. And no one was punished for perverting words of Dear Leader.

They write it on their missiles too. So please spare me of that musquote nonsense.

Allow me as well to refresh your memory...

This is your claim:

Israel's President has very clearly stated that it [Israel] would wipe Iran off the map.

And here the real quote:

"the president of Iran should remember that Iran can also be wiped off the map"

 

[somebozo]

whats with Israel obsession..can the ayatollah regime match 1% of Israeli scientific and political achievements? Including laying claim to 2000 years old legacy as well conquering it too..if you look at it from pure political and military POV, its sure an achievement of will power..

 

[Cyrus the Great]

what does it mean for pakistan - negatives and positives?

how should pakistan react - support? resist? stay neutral?


please discuss, indians welcome to answer the same questions as well, but replace pakistan with india - just to give a different perspective.

WRONG "IF" US is not able to invade Iran

 

[Cyrus the Great]

If they are invaded, it would be good for us. Because if Iran does get Nuclear weapons - then this will start a nuclear-arms race in the middle east.

First we are not happy when Pakistan invaded by US, second US never can invade Iran

 

[Cyrus the Great]

@ DesiGuy,

I don't think many people in Pakistan would care enough to react. Maybe some Shia would care, because some of the Shia love Iran more than their/our own country, Pakistan.

I am sure other Sunni brothers do not think in the way you think.
If any war happen,it is not issue of Shia and Christianity, is between Islam and infidelity.
it does not mean Iran expect or need any help from muslim countries, what we only need is do not bite us from back side.

 

[Cyrus the Great]

So it's decided that US will not invade iran?? lol ;D

invasion of Iran is big word for US mouth

 

[Cyrus the Great]

Ofcourse they would want to retaliate. But i'm not sure if they would be capable of doing major against us.

I am sure never Pak land will be used against Iran, Iran was the first country recognized Pak independence, I do not like to say something to hurt Pakistan but when i read your comments then i have to say do you think if your land will be used against Iran, Iran will stay silent? big mistake. US will leave here soon or late then we have to live side by side for ever.
I am very happy that most of Pakistanies do not think in your way.

 

[Cyrus the Great]

Pakistan is the ONLY nuclear power in the Muzlim world. And i want it to stay this way.

Narrow mind. is pak's nulear against muslim that you want pak saty only muslim nulear power?