'If Iranian general can be droned for terrorism, why not a Pakistani general?'

[Windjammer]

The title should be If Indra Gandhi could have Sikh bodyguards, why not Modi.

 

[BringHarmony]

America's defense budget is 640 billion dollars. Much more than GDP of Iran (about 450 billion). India's defense budget is less than 60 billion dollars. When India has a defence budget of 300 to 400 billion dollars they can think about going that cowboy -- assuming Pakistan stays still. Till then, they can shut up and stuff it.

 

[El Sidd]

Indian analysts are now badmouthing Iran to build up a narrative.

They are going to use it to further their anti muslim schemes

https://twitter.com/x/status/1213153820445941760

Sue this newspaper before local najaiz baniye ki auladen start harping

Good one. Solemani and his gang which was hobnobbing with India against Pakistan with chahbahar non sense , Kulbashan episode and all.

Hope Iranian establishment is reading this story.

India plays all sides in Iran. Afghanistan is gonna flare up as proxies get traded or squared off

 

[Bossman]

America's defense budget is 640 billion dollars. Much more than GDP of Iran (about 450 billion). India's defense budget is less than 60 billion dollars. When India has a defence budget of 300 to 400 billion dollars they can think about going that cowboy -- assuming Pakistan stays still. Till then, they can shut up and stuff it.

My friend, how much was the budget of the Peoples Liberation Army when they were on the Long March under Mao? If you are a real Chinese, you have lost the lessons of the revolution.

 

[BringHarmony]

My friend, how much was the budget of the Peoples Liberation Army when they were on the Long March under Mao? If you are a real Chinese, you have lost the lessons of the revolution.

I am not a Chinese. Not at all. Infact if any Chinese read whats in my profile, they will be furious.

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

For the PAF can take out the top IA scums at the broad day light with a prior notice...

 

[BringHarmony]

My friend, how much was the budget of the Peoples Liberation Army when they were on the Long March under Mao? If you are a real Chinese, you have lost the lessons of the revolution.

As far as Long March goes, which year did the long march happen? It was 1930s AFAIK. In 1930, in China a bunch of people carrying guns were a major force and could have even actually fought a war. Now a days, such formation will be powerless in front of modern armor/ UACV.

The point being, war/conflict moved from human intensive to capital intensive after WW2.

 

[Flight of falcon]

You know what I wish they actually target one of our generals...... as the saying goes GAngooland will never produce a male again..::

 

[lonelyman]

'If Iranian general can be droned for terrorism, why not a Pakistani general?'

Chidanand Rajghatta | TNN | Updated: Jan 4, 2020, 22:26 IST

WASHINGTON: Amid widespread misgivings in the US Congress and among American analysts about the assassination of a serving general of a sovereign nation, the Trump administration is belatedly making the case that Iranian General

Qassim Suleimani
was a terrorist and a war criminal who should have been targeted a long time ago, even though he was not on any global proscribed list.


In fact, top administration officials are going so far as to link Iran and Suleimani to 9/11, even though the US Commission that carried out a monumental inquiry into the attack found no such connection. The 9/11 attack was carried out by Sunni extremists, mostly from

Saudi Arabia
, who by most accounts had little or no connection to Shia-majority Iran, a hated regional rival.


US vice-president

Mike Pence
was among those who wheeled out this 9/11 connection in a series of tweets listing Suleimani’s purported terrorist activities, alleging that he “assisted in the clandestine travel to Afghanistan of 10 of the 12 terrorists who carried out the September 11 terrorist attacks in the United States.”


Pence was eviscerated by analysts for “gaslighting” the American public, with experts arguing that the idea that Suleimani would assist in 9/11 — knowingly or otherwise — made no sense, because besides being Shia, he actually cooperated with the US government against the Taliban in Afghanistan, which hosted the 9/11 plotters and perpetrators.

Indeed, the assassination of general Suleimani opened a can of worms for the Trump administration with some Af-Pak experts asking why Washington should not target Pakistani generals who have a more established record of backing and carrying out terrorist attacks.


"Important point: why aren’t the Americans confronting the Taliban masters in Pakistan in a similar manner? The Taliban and their masters in Rawalpindi are responsible for the killing of 3500 US servicemen in Afghanistan," asked Saad Mohseni, a prominent Afghan entrepreneur.


And from a US military veteran on Twitter: So Americans killed by a foreign proxy group are worthy of revenge when it is Iran providing the support, but when it is Pakistan supporting the Taliban and HQN killing Americans in AFG they get a peace deal and Pakistan gets aid.


Several US military commanders and administration officials have accused Pakistan’s military intelligence agency ISI of using Taliban proxies to kill American personnel in Afghanistan with no retribution from successive administrations in Washington except for aid cuts and downgraded ties.

Earlier this week, US secretary of state

Mike Pompeo
revealed in a tweet that he had phoned Pakistan's Chief of Staff General Bajwa and to brief him about "US defensive action to kill Qassim Suleimani," adding that "the #Iran regime’s actions in the region are destabilizing and our resolve in protecting American interests, personnel, facilities, and partners will not waver." It was not clear if Pompeo intended it to be a warning to Bajwa and Pakistan, which in the eyes of some US analysts has long carried out a covert proxy war against US forces in Afghanistan.


Separately, Washington is rife with speculation as to why Trump decided to go in for such precipitate action against Suleimani that is resulting in something the President has pointedly sought to avoid: deploying more US troops abroad. One explanation is that Trump felt he looked weak after his 2019 decision to call off an airstrike against Iran after it downed the US surveillance drone.


There is also conjecture that Trump resented being trolled by Suleimani on social media. The Iranian general was apparently quite adept on Twitter, frequently taunting Trump, including calling him a “bartender” and a “casino manager.”


There are also more serious wag-the-dog explanations for the strike, with one prominent American scribe saying it is "hard to decouple his (Sulemani’s) killing from the impeachment saga." Indeed, the impeachment saga has been blown off the news cycle, at least for now.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...-a-pakistani-general/articleshow/73102067.cms

RSS hindu dreaming wild, they deserve the nuclear bombs dropped on their head

America's defense budget is 640 billion dollars. Much more than GDP of Iran (about 450 billion). India's defense budget is less than 60 billion dollars. When India has a defence budget of 300 to 400 billion dollars they can think about going that cowboy -- assuming Pakistan stays still. Till then, they can shut up and stuff it.

false flagger Hindu, why are you in every thread defend India and denigrate China?

Why are you so shamed of yourself? why u don't have the courage and honor to do it openly?

 

[TruthHurtz]

You see how the goalpost moves? Now other states will feel emboldened by this terrorist act against a freedom fighter. To all those Pakistanis who were mocking Soleimani's death.

 

[BringHarmony]

RSS hindu dreaming wild, they deserve the nuclear bombs dropped on their head



false flagger Hindu, why are you in every thread defend India and denigrate China?

Why are you so shamed of yourself? why u don't have the courage and honor to do it openly?

Huh? I do denigrate China because they are basically a bunch of ...well.... retards. But I do not defend India.

BTW, can you read? Also do you know the meaning of "shut it" and "stuff it"? I said that wrt India, though it is useful to apply to yourself as well.

 

[Bossman]

As far as Long March goes, which year did the long march happen? It was 1930s AFAIK. In 1930, in China a bunch of people carrying guns were a major force and could have even actually fought a war. Now a days, such formation will be powerless in front of modern armor/ UACV.

The point being, war/conflict moved from human intensive to capital intensive after WW2.

You are wrong, fundamentals don’t always have to change with time. The strategy and tactics of battles fought many centuries ago can still be relevant today. Obviously you don’t know any thing about strategy and tactics.

BTW what about Vietnam and Afghanistan?

 

[Salahuddin Ayyubi]

I can give a simple answer for this articles questions.


Ans). Because the tea is fantastic [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]

'If Iranian general can be droned for terrorism, why not a Pakistani general?'

Chidanand Rajghatta | TNN | Updated: Jan 4, 2020, 22:26 IST

WASHINGTON: Amid widespread misgivings in the US Congress and among American analysts about the assassination of a serving general of a sovereign nation, the Trump administration is belatedly making the case that Iranian General

Qassim Suleimani
was a terrorist and a war criminal who should have been targeted a long time ago, even though he was not on any global proscribed list.


In fact, top administration officials are going so far as to link Iran and Suleimani to 9/11, even though the US Commission that carried out a monumental inquiry into the attack found no such connection. The 9/11 attack was carried out by Sunni extremists, mostly from

Saudi Arabia
, who by most accounts had little or no connection to Shia-majority Iran, a hated regional rival.


US vice-president

Mike Pence
was among those who wheeled out this 9/11 connection in a series of tweets listing Suleimani’s purported terrorist activities, alleging that he “assisted in the clandestine travel to Afghanistan of 10 of the 12 terrorists who carried out the September 11 terrorist attacks in the United States.”


Pence was eviscerated by analysts for “gaslighting” the American public, with experts arguing that the idea that Suleimani would assist in 9/11 — knowingly or otherwise — made no sense, because besides being Shia, he actually cooperated with the US government against the Taliban in Afghanistan, which hosted the 9/11 plotters and perpetrators.

Indeed, the assassination of general Suleimani opened a can of worms for the Trump administration with some Af-Pak experts asking why Washington should not target Pakistani generals who have a more established record of backing and carrying out terrorist attacks.


"Important point: why aren’t the Americans confronting the Taliban masters in Pakistan in a similar manner? The Taliban and their masters in Rawalpindi are responsible for the killing of 3500 US servicemen in Afghanistan," asked Saad Mohseni, a prominent Afghan entrepreneur.


And from a US military veteran on Twitter: So Americans killed by a foreign proxy group are worthy of revenge when it is Iran providing the support, but when it is Pakistan supporting the Taliban and HQN killing Americans in AFG they get a peace deal and Pakistan gets aid.


Several US military commanders and administration officials have accused Pakistan’s military intelligence agency ISI of using Taliban proxies to kill American personnel in Afghanistan with no retribution from successive administrations in Washington except for aid cuts and downgraded ties.

Earlier this week, US secretary of state

Mike Pompeo
revealed in a tweet that he had phoned Pakistan's Chief of Staff General Bajwa and to brief him about "US defensive action to kill Qassim Suleimani," adding that "the #Iran regime’s actions in the region are destabilizing and our resolve in protecting American interests, personnel, facilities, and partners will not waver." It was not clear if Pompeo intended it to be a warning to Bajwa and Pakistan, which in the eyes of some US analysts has long carried out a covert proxy war against US forces in Afghanistan.


Separately, Washington is rife with speculation as to why Trump decided to go in for such precipitate action against Suleimani that is resulting in something the President has pointedly sought to avoid: deploying more US troops abroad. One explanation is that Trump felt he looked weak after his 2019 decision to call off an airstrike against Iran after it downed the US surveillance drone.


There is also conjecture that Trump resented being trolled by Suleimani on social media. The Iranian general was apparently quite adept on Twitter, frequently taunting Trump, including calling him a “bartender” and a “casino manager.”


There are also more serious wag-the-dog explanations for the strike, with one prominent American scribe saying it is "hard to decouple his (Sulemani’s) killing from the impeachment saga." Indeed, the impeachment saga has been blown off the news cycle, at least for now.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...-a-pakistani-general/articleshow/73102067.cms

 

[lonelyman]

Huh? I do denigrate China because they are basically a bunch of ...well.... retards. But I do not defend India.

BTW, can you read? Also do you know the meaning of "shut it" and "stuff it"? I said that wrt India, though it is useful to apply to yourself as well.

Rss Hindu lunatic call Chinese retard? That’s fresh

2020 rapists open shitting supa powa guys are the most despicable disgusting animals in South Asia, disgrace to human race

 

[BringHarmony]

You are wrong, fundamentals don’t always have to change with time. The strategy and tactics of battles fought many centuries ago can still be relevant today. Obviously you don’t know any thing about strategy and tactics.

BTW what about Vietnam and Afghanistan?

Do you want your nation to become Vietnam after Vietnam war? Or Afghanistan? Just to kill one general?

The question is not just about killing that general, its about doing with impunity.