What's new

If India supports freedom in Crimea, why not in Kashmir?

. .
The answer is simple, Kashmir was legitimately handed over to India by its previous ruler(King). We have the signed paperwork to prove it. And after independence the original Kashmiris were forced out of their land by insurgents and terrorists from across the border in an attempt to take the land. So Kashmir is Indian, and people who want the land and cry for freedom and do they senseless killing in the valley can go back to the land they came, from which is across the border.

I don't believe in forced relationship, but somehow the other Kashmir issue can't be rolled back. I think practical approach would be something like east and west Germany. Both countries should gradually move towards more closer relationship and should be away from the establishments.
 
. . . .
Message to Bangladeshi... Might is Right, get that straight!
You have to do a lot of things only after taking India's consent which we don't have to do.
LOLz,these lungiwals simply don't understand the fact that we literally "own" them:rofl:!So they might whine as much as they want to but the reality is that we are holding Bangaldesh by it's neck ;)and they can't do a sh*t about that and this is the f*cking reality:cheers:

Zalimo jo log Kashmir dekhna chahte hain unko to ane Diya karo,I won't cause any trouble..promise:D
Okay Ma'am you have got my permission to enter Kashmir:P.Now this should make you happy i guess;)

These things have been discussed to death many times,dont you people get bored reading and repeating the same thing again and again.
Nah they don't get bored because they(the BD lungiwalas) don't have anything else to do other than whining constantly about the "hegemonic" policies of India:rofl:
 
Last edited:
.
agreed bro, but to be honest, U.N resolutions are not a realistic option , India would not agree to that,so the best option would be to some how settle it bilaterally on a give & take option , & on the basis of some thing is better then nothing
say if a give & take, like we agree to make the L.O.C as an international border but with some compromises from India
& we give India direct land access to Central Asia, Afghanistan etc's in return , in that way we might get some land from them, & they can get their land transit from us , so it will be a win-win situation for both the sides
If only they would have been possible:rolleyes:!!But then again both the leaders of India and Pakistan are too egoistic to make this happen.This is the sad reality mere bhai....:tsk:

No it is the policy of India but external powers may become involved on the basis of violations of human rights ....
Pray tell us the names of some of those "external powers"!!This is India we are talking about not just some tom,dick or harry like Ukraine.Nobody will risk an all out nuke war with India just because of a few millions Kashmiris(not even your "beloved" ex brother)....:coffee:
 
.
And if the US, China and Pakistan support Bangladesh in its interest India should have no problem ...

US will support BD over India!! :lol:

So did US and China recognizes the Indian puppet government selected by rigged election or not?
 
.
Aray dada ithna duki kyon rahthay ho,,,,life may kabhi kabhi chill huva karoo....
R e bhai woh sirf ek Bangaldeshi lungiwala hain,isi liye chill karna uske fitrat mein nehi hain:D.Akhir ek lungiwala unpad kya jane chill karna kise kehte hain;)!!
 
.
We support of merger of Sindh, Bangladesh and balochistan in India..

So there was a conspiracy hatched by the British and India to annex Kashmir ....


Yes yes, There was a conspiracy . This conspiracy was formed some 1000 year ago. Aftr that every one started seeing conspiracy and always remain deluded and paranoid... :P
 
Last edited:
.
You should try to allow it through amendment of the constitution.

Surely will be done when the lawmakers see the need for it. Right now, the demand for such a provision is pretty low from some vocal quarters. Majority of the population has not seen a need for it.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom