What's new

ICHR member calls Indian Leftists Jihad-friendly

I think we do. Pretty solidly.
.

I do not think so, not yet.

Well he also claims to have worked in HAL, built a software company, play god and teach in a university :P ........... now he lurks in pdf as a final tribute to his glory :D

Last year he went to distribute supplies to the Kashmiris stranded during the floods and tipped off the separatists who conveniently stole all the supplies he got.
 
. .
More or less, only it wasn't HAL - I couldn't have stood that. And I didn't build one software company. Thirdly, I don't play God; I'm an atheist. I suppose the other bits and pieces are another story.

oh ya ..... you also worked in the army or IAF, right ? :D

Last year he went to distribute supplies to the Kashmiris stranded during the floods and tipped off the separatists who conveniently stole all the supplies he got.

LOL..... you don't say !!! Din't he show his PDF Id card ? or just flash his name to spare him the distress :P
 
.
Not a Hindu troll, quite obviously. Do you need assistance to figure it out? And I think the religion of Islam is a religion like all others, totally unfit for human consumption, so it will be difficult - even for you - to fit me into the Jehadi category, or <dictionary warning> to juxtapose me to the Owaisi brothers.

I am curious to know where you picked up your syntax; was it at a clearance sale?

...then who you are....
....and why feeling offend because of truth.....
....we all knows who surrendered....

Who surrendered, and to whom, by the way? Do you have a clue?

First you pick a small sentence from a totally different quote, you giving your unwanted advice to someone whose mentality totally matches Bangladeshi jamati party. And without even reading his troll and abusive post you start to distribute certificate for hindu troll :lol: When some one show him mirror then you start to feel pain. No one need your certificate cause it worth nothing.
 
. . . . .
.
Well left parties are now a days not different from Mamta's TMC or Nitish Kumar's JuD or even congress.

All are busy doing muslim vote bank politics but still distributing certificate for others. And some idiots even believe in their sh**.

Its only a negative rating dude. .......... it means absolutely NOTHING. This is pdf, its like a medal of honour to get a negative rating.

I know buddy but why double standard for others when you can not follow them ??
 
.
Well left parties are now a days not different from Mamta's TMC or Nitish Kumar's JuD or even congress.

All are busy doing muslim vote bank politics but still distributing certificate for others. And some idiots even believe in their sh**.

I know buddy but why double standard for others when you can not follow them ??

Again , this is pdf. If you want the power to give Negative Ratings, you need to have double standards. :disagree:

All the more reason why it means jack $hit.
 
. . .
@Joe Shearer You calling people by name but when some one did same for you give them negative rating ???
Read your own language in this post
URL="ICHR member calls Indian Leftists Jihad-friendly | Page 7"]ICHR member calls Indian Leftists Jihad-friendly[/URL]
Its I know all and arrogance!! The contents of subject "History" is always debatable, but agree to disagree should be the motto not that I am superior to you. Like Churchill said "History will be kind enough to me for I would write it"!!

BTW from sci-fi POV some one should invent time machine, so that instead of arguing we can visit that time and "doodh ka doodh aur pani ka pani" ho jayega!!:D
 
.
Its I know all and arrogance!! The contents of subject "History" is always debatable, but agree to disagree should be the motto not that I am superior to you. Like Churchill said "History will be kind enough to me for I would write it"!!

BTW from sci-fi POV some one should invent time machine, so that instead of arguing we can visit that time and "doodh ka doodh aur pani ka pani" ho jayega!!:D
Contents of 'History' is not a subject of debate. Problem lies in its interpretation. For example, Ramayana, off course one of the finest epics in the history of world does not hold much value to a set of historians as a reliable text to write Indian history for its countless limitations. The epic has two distinct variations in the early Buddhist and Jain literature, contradicting if not wholly, some of the major parts in the dominant version; however these two variations do not seem to hold much value either to the other set of Historians (the right wing), as the alterations definitely breach their fortress of Indian tradition and culture. The zeal was never to prove the supremacy of one theory on another but to reach a hurried conclusion which is practically impossible in case of early Indian history. Sadly enough, lack of such zeal makes one a Jihadist today.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom