What's new

IAF takes a candid look at the 1965 war

.
You want me to post instrument of surrender here once again

Sure go ahead; your talking about Pakistani forces without supplies and almost virtually out of ammunition, surrounded by enemies; it was nothing wrong for the General to sign instrument of surrender.
 
.
Sure go ahead; your talking about Pakistani forces without supplies and almost virtually out of ammunition, surrounded by enemies; it was nothing wrong for the General to sign instrument of surrender.
Yeah 90,000 surrendered to mere 6000 Indian Soldiers that to in just 13 days of war :disagree::disagree:
 
.
@Windjammer

You never bust any bubble but always end up tagging mods after embarrasing yourself ....so why don't you stick to your usual gay sources and random tweets ...i only corroborated the op 35 ~ aircrafts destroyed on ground.

And Paf fuked up in 65 even after it was the first force in south asia to be equipped with AA missile ...while indian ground forces were entrenched in fertile plains of Pakistan punjab.

so much for air dominance and Sidewinder :lol:
@Stephen Cohen
What an irony, look what the international media of the time reported about your battles in Punjab, Indians will be Indians, always suffering from a AkhandBharat Orgasm !!!

images


images


Pakistani troops deep inside Indian territory , capturing their regional railway stations , yet India wants to celebrate its pathetic performance in 1965 war, Indians are a brainwashed nation enmasse !!!


images

images

pk9-1965d.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
We annexed 1200 sq.km of pak territory in Kashmir( and never returned it )in 1971 along with partitioning Pakistan :chilli:
You mean kar
@Stephen Cohen
What an irony, look what the international media of the time reported about your battles in Punjab, Indians will be Indians, always suffering from a AkhandBharat Orgasm !!!

images


images


Pakistani troops deep inside Indian territory , capturing their regional railway stations , yet India wants to celebrate its pathetic performance in 1965 war, Indians are a brainwashed nation enmasse !!!


images

images

pk9-1965d.jpg

lamo ... same old gay australian which claim ssg can run 5 mile in 20 minutes ...

apart from the fact that pak utterly failed in its millitary objective like capturing kashmir she lost more tanks,more men and more land that too fertile plains of punjab...

The war was militarily inconclusive; each side held prisoners and some territory belonging to the other. Losses were relatively heavy—on the Pakistani side, twenty aircraft, 200 tanks, and 3,800 troops. Pakistan's army had been able to withstand Indian pressure, but a continuation of the fighting would only have led to further losses and ultimate defeat for Pakistan. Most Pakistanis, schooled in the belief of their own martial prowess, refused to accept the possibility of their country's military defeat by "Hindu India" and were, instead, quick to blame their failure to attain their military aims on what they considered to be the ineptitude of Ayub Khan and his government.

  • TIME magazine reported that India held 690 mi2 of Pakistan territory while Pakistan held 250 mi2 of Indian territory in Kashmir and Rajasthan. Additionally, Pakistan had lost almost half its armour temporarily.[83] The article further elaborates,
Severely mauled by the larger Indian armed forces, Pakistan could continue the fight only by teaming up with Red China and turning its back on the U.N.


INSIDE FERTILE PLAIN OF PAKISTAN AND STRATEGIC HAJI PIR PASS ....INDIAN ARMY WAS INSIDE PAKISTAN WHEN CEASE FIRED SIGHN

PATTONS AS LONG AS YOUR EYES CAN SEE

2.jpg

6503.jpg

2ed5jpt.jpg


ASKING PERMISSION TO RECOVER DEAD BODIES AND WOUNDED
42923778_ff3c79fb1c.jpg

77(2).JPG

14mtnxx.jpg

29punp0.jpg
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom