IAF R-73/R-77 AAMs recovered from Mig-21 wreckage l Abhinandan did not fire any missile

[Maxpane]

wooow

 

[Secret Service]

This is definitely a flanker on fire...

View attachment 548139

yes it is a flanker.

They were flying at 12000 to 15000 ft above sea level atleast. This is a big aircraft captured from a mobile phone camera from ground.

 

[Mrc]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1108736366278569985

Comments? MKI?

Thats a down flanker

 

[Oruc]

looks more pointy than Bison.

 

[Ali_Baba]

That picture is of a Flanker for sure. Wow !!!

*** KILL CONFIRMED ***

 

[Trailer23]

Somewhere in Nevada, the Brig. General of RED FLAG is sitting in his office, talking to one of his subordinates & saying, "Man, we gotta get them boys from the PAK-istan Air Force down here after the sh!t they pulled on the IAF."

It is without a doubt in my mind that the US have been monitoring (from afar) everything that's been going on - and not just related to the use of F-16's. But from a training aspect, they'd probably want to know how a China/Pakistan built aircraft got the best of the IAF.

#PAF2019RedFlag

 

[Xeson]

Hello, Learned fellows... are the markings on this comparison image correct? Also how about the claim of the R-73 missing the warhead and propellant sections?

 

[Myth_buster_1]

Hello, Learned fellows... are the markings on this comparison image correct? Also how about the claim of the R-73 missing the warhead and propellant sections?

yes, but if you are going to prove a point to indians then its better if you refer 3 and 4 with actual wreckage. like what i did.

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/iaf-...fire-any-missile.607189/page-11#post-11287514

 

[Xeson]

oh that is great, thank you for suggesting that, i think that image with R-73 attached to the pylon is the most important as for the point of R-73 being used or not goes. Thanks for this anyway..
P.S. nops not even gonna try to convince any of neighbours, if these images cant no need. I just hope we pakistanis could debunk the tale of how many and which jets were shot for ourselves atleast and have a bit of rest lol.

yes, but if you are going to prove a point to indians then its better if you refer 3 and 4 with actual wreckage. like what i did.

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/iaf-...fire-any-missile.607189/page-11#post-11287514

 

[MZ-PDF]

yes, but if you are going to prove a point to indians then its better if you refer 3 and 4 with actual wreckage. like what i did.

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/iaf-...fire-any-missile.607189/page-11#post-11287514

AoA, stupid indian analysts are saying that there was only one R-73 in the wreckage video. Do you pics of the second R-73 in the wreckage?

 

[Myth_buster_1]

AoA, stupid indian analysts are saying that there was only one R-73 in the wreckage video. Do you pics of the second R-73 in the wreckage?

That would have been final nail in IAF fanboy's coffins but the 2nd r73 does have 11 digit serial number that can be only traced back to IAF inventory.