Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@AgNoStiC MuSliM How many times is he allowed to post sectarian flame bate comments? please ban this monster before he starts another sectarian war on PDF.
I think he's criticised the current Iranian regime with his comments....and I echo that criticism.
This is not Iran Defence Forum, it is Pakistan Defence Forum.
Criticism of toxic Iranian policy has nothing to do with ordinary Shias. Not everyone who resists Assad and Iranian proxies in Syria is a "Salafist beheader, liver eater."
@OsmanAli98 Frankly disappointed in you.
You guys wish to stifle the right of people to criticize Assad and Iran by threatening others.
The whole Muslim world, including Pakistan, is upset with Iranian foreign policy. This regime promoted sectarian murderous proxies in Syria and Iraq, is keeping Afghanistan disunited via racial/sectarian politics, becoming an ally of anti-Muslim fascist regimes (India, Armenia, Serbia, and Russia,) and spreading sectarian war throughout our region.
Before anyone calls us sectarian Salafists, KSA is equally reprehensible, and I have been very vocal against their policies, probably more so than Iran. Ask Arab members here, most of them refer to me as a Shia apologist.
Why would Erdogan back terrorists who will most likely make Turkey a target after Syria. Seems like a faulty policy.
let's imagine that Iran did not intervened and the rebellion/revolution toppled him, do you think US/west would tolerate a MB ruled country?? they would simply topple them and hunt them with help of other influential parties like they did in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and etc. and then install a pro west government that accept Israel. and that would effectively cut our hand from Lebanon and Palestine.Not everyone who resists Assad and Iranian proxies in Syria is a "Salafist beheader, liver eater."
But is that catastrophe because of a dictator, Assad, who wanted to cling to power no matter the cost or militias provided by Iran?According to Iranians, we just imagined the humanitarian catastrophe in Syria.
But is that catastrophe because of a dictator, Assad, who wanted to cling to power no matter the cost or militias provided by Iran?
The Iranian militias acted in concert with Assad, but the chemical weapons, heavy artillery and civilian casualties were all controlled by Assad, not Iranian militias.
Why should there be disappointment this is a free exchange fourm unless you are troll I respect you as a fellow Pakistani brother despite disagreements on certain issues and policies it's a fourm don't make a big deal over it
But is that catastrophe because of a dictator, Assad, who wanted to cling to power no matter the cost or militias provided by Iran?
The Iranian militias acted in concert with Assad, but the chemical weapons, heavy artillery and civilian casualties were all controlled by Assad, not Iranian militias.
So you think it is ok or fair to ban one viewpoint and not the other?
It is ridiculous, already Pakistani government feels they need to walk on egg shells about Iran, while Iran openly supports India and gives it a base of operations against Pakistan in Afghanistan, Chahbahar, and now Oman. We are not fools.
We should be fair and treat all allies of India the same, not just criticize Gulf Arabs alone. Both are strong supporters of Modi and have went all in.
Assad is the main culprit and he has no qualms about religion, he is an atheist. Unfortunately some rebels and Iranian proxies have pushed the rhetoric of sectarian war, and he is content to see his people being killed on all sides as long as he stays in power.
No I did not say ban but why do you have to feel disappointed just because some other members have other viewpoints I think it's unfair I had my comments deleted by mods here for opposing the Turkish policies in Syria
No I did not say ban but why do you have to feel disappointed just because some other members have other viewpoints I think it's unfair I had my comments deleted by mods here for opposing the Turkish policies in Syria
Some Pakistanis here are delusional about their support for Turkey. So delusional, that anyone who critisizes Turkey's blatant aggression in Syria, is immediately labelled as an Assad supporter. What such people don't realize is that some of us look at the subject matter objectively and identify the "real culprits" as saudi, qatari regimes, america, france, britain and turkey. Assad does have blood on his hands, and as true Muslims we would want to bring him to justice. However, this shall NOT be achieved by aligning ourselves with zionist-america, zionist-britain, zionist-france, zionist-saudi, zionist-qatar and turkey.
The moment of reckoning is nigh, for Turkey. It has a choice to either work with Russia to bring peace first to Syria. And it is exactly what "True Muslims" want. When peace is established in Syria, all terrorists are eliminated and all uninvited foreign militaries leave. Then the process of strictly monitored elections shall be held, with Assad NOT being a candidate. It is then, that the Syrian people may exersize their right to choose their leader.