What's new

Huawei 'failed to improve UK security standards

and as thank you, you got this :p:
China has completed 450,000 5G base stations, 40,000 in Europe and 20,000 in the United States.
You see, the United States is so important, and Europe is so important. Without you, Huawei would die. :omghaha: :omghaha: :omghaha:


You think you are important. This is an illusion that losers often have. :omghaha: :omghaha: :omghaha:
 
.
China has completed 450,000 5G base stations, 40,000 in Europe and 20,000 in the United States.
You see, the United States is so important, and Europe is so important. Without you, Huawei would die. :omghaha: :omghaha: :omghaha:


You think you are important. This is an illusion that losers often have. :omghaha: :omghaha: :omghaha:

But, this below_ still remains true. Nothing is going to put Humpty back again.

 
.
But, this below_ still remains true. Nothing is going to put Humpty back again.

You can wait until 2027 to see if Huawei will be removed :omghaha: :omghaha: :omghaha:
 
. .
Huawei at least allow UK to check their code and equipment, other USA and EU comapny would just say mind their own business with their government support.
Thats exactly why the US terror regime has given up convincing the world of their blatant lies about Chinese telecom suppliers that Hindutva shills keep parotting and is outright threatening and blackmailing their own closest "allies" with economic sanctions, if their economy dares to make the objectively safer and more economic choice of going with Huawei.

But as we can see with the Atlantic bridge and Pacific ties burning, so much they have to resort to pander to jokes like India at this point, thats just desperation hoping for some miracle to delay the ineviteable.
 
. .
Basically Huawei did improve its security as it always does and still does not actually have any concrete known "backdoors" as proclaimed by the US regime, but on pressure of the US regime they increased scrutinity against Huawei with standards no other service provider can deliver either, to justify replacing it with the gaping holes of "trusted" US regime affiliated bugged hardware that fails every test unless you pretend the known backdoors aren't there.



2009 Huawei equipment was found to have USA backdoors that many Western equipment has. Maybe Nokia is better than Huawei, less CiA/NSA backdoors in Nokia than Huawei. Europe found zero Chinese-made backdoors, only USA-made backdoors in Huawei. Somebody needs to improve Huawei or else NSA is going to keep spying on Angela Merkel, even with safer and more secure Huawei products.

Huawei has not been found with their own backdoors, they use interface that the West makes, that has NSA backdoors.

So any attack on Huawei, incriminates the West.
 
.
Basically Huawei did improve its security as it always does and still does not actually have any concrete known "backdoors" as proclaimed by the US regime, but on pressure of the US regime they increased scrutinity against Huawei with standards no other service provider can deliver either, to justify replacing it with the gaping holes of "trusted" US regime affiliated bugged hardware that fails every test unless you pretend the known backdoors aren't there.

It's true.

If Made in China has a flaw, imagine USA made equipment.

Up to today, Windows has been always being patched.

MacOS is not better than Windows.

Not to mention the flaw in Intel processor.

But still, it's not a problem for using USA made products.


All of it just a propaganda, rather than a reality.
 
.
.

Huawei has failed to adequately tackle security flaws in equipment used in the UK's telecoms networks despite previous complaints, an official report says.
It also flagged that a vulnerability "of national significance" had occurred in 2019 but been fixed before it could be exploited.

The assessment was given by an oversight board, chaired by a member of the cyber-spy agency GCHQ.

It could influence other nations weighing up use of Huawei's kit.


The report said that GCHQ's National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) had seen no evidence that Huawei had made a significant shift in its approach to the matter.
And it added that while some improvements had been made, it had no confidence they were sustainable.

As a result, it concluded, the board could only provide "limited assurance that all risks to UK national security" could be mitigated in the long-term.
In July, the government announced that due to US sanctions Huawei would eventually be excluded from the new 5G telecoms network by 2027, but the Chinese company can continue to play a role in older mobile phone networks and fixed broadband.

The US has argued that using Huawei's equipment creates a risk of the Chinese state carrying out espionage or sabotage, something the company has always denied.
Despite the criticisms, British security officials say they can manage the current risks posed by using Huawei's existing kit, and they do not believe the defects they have found are a result of Chinese state interference.

Huawei has responded saying the report highlights its commitment to openness and transparency.

"The report acknowledges that while our software transformation process is in its infancy, we have made some progress in improving our software engineering capabilities," a spokesman said.

Although the company now has limited prospects in the UK, it is still hoping to sell its 5G kits to other parts of Europe.

Earlier this week, the chief of its Italian business suggested that other countries could carry out detailed inspections of their own to help overcome security concerns.
"We will open our insides, we are available to be vivisected to respond to all of this political pressure," said Luigi De Vecchis.

However, the Financial Times has reported that Germany is set to be next to ban local networks from using the firm's 5G products.

One expert said setting up an operation like HSEC required a state to provide considerable resources, and offered no guarantee of success.

"Even if Huawei passes the technical evaluation, which we see from today's report is not certain, they may yet be blocked at the political level," said Emily Taylor, editor of the Journal of Cyber Policy.

Delayed findings
Huawei equipment has been used in the UK for a decade and a half.

Since 2010, a special Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre (HCSEC), based in Banbury, has been tasked with checking its telecoms infrastructure products.
An oversight board then examines the work of HCSEC and reports to the UK's National Security Advisor annually, although the latest report covering 2019 was delayed because of the coronavirus pandemic.

Last year, the report raised serious concerns about standard of Huawei's equipment and software, and there is no major change in the latest assessment.
In 2018, Huawei committed to a $2bn (£1.5bn) five-year plan to improve its software engineering processes in response to previous criticism.
But the new report complains that Huawei has yet to convince that it can complete the effort on time, and adds that "unless a detailed and satisfactory plan has been provided, it is not possible to offer any degree of confidence that the identified problems can be addressed by Huawei".

In particular it highlighted "poor coding practices" and said there was a "range of evidence" employees were not following Huawei's own guidelines.
Huawei argues it is still in the early stages of the plan and real improvements will only be reflected in future reports.

Broadband flaw
The report adds the amount of vulnerabilities reported in 2019 were "significantly beyond" the number found in 2018, but says this is partly due to the increasing effectiveness of the checks rather than an overall decline in standards.

But it highlights one vulnerability of "national significance" in 2019, which required extraordinary measures to fix.

The BBC has learned this was related to broadband - but officials do not believe anyone exploited the flaw.

The report covers 2019, and so does not address the period when the US imposed new sanctions affecting Huawei.

Those sanctions technically affect HCSEC itself, since it is part of Huawei, and will require changes in its organisational structure.

@Feng Leng @hualushui @Beast @FairAndUnbiased
As if US equipment will improve UK security. That is a fool's idea.
Better listen to USA NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden before these ignorant activitists turned journalists penned more nonsense.
 
.
Where's the lawsuit?

It's fine for China to take Windows, nVidia, Intel design, etc as their own then?

exactly. if there's proof that IP has been compromised, any company can file a lawsuit against the Chinese company in their home jurisdiction and get their product banned directly and legally.

Why don't they?
 
.
Maybe Nokia is better than Huawei, less CiA/NSA backdoors in Nokia than Huawei.

So much for Nokia being free of NSA backdoors, Microsoft has many NSA backdoors to spy on you. So much so that China demanded their own Windows operating system free of NSA backdoors, and Microsoft complied.

Here is Nokia potentially going into the camp of NSA spying:


I was fine with Ericsson and Nokia in Europe, however if the NSA and CiA are buying them through Intel or Microsoft, then we want Huawei in Europe. You can generally trust Nokia and the Finns. You can't trust Washington.

USA is gonna steal Finnish intellectual property through their 'rules and regulations' of wads of worthless dollars.

Maybe trump could ban Nokia unless they sell to US company, like they did to TikTok. :enjoy:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom