Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
a combine force of four frigates,at least 3 subs,some 4-8 missile boats(multi-platform tactical boats) for sea cover cover
and at least a mini squadron(10-15 plane) of fighter planes(FOR AIR COVER) can take out any group of opposing force's frigates,destroyers,missile boats,submarines
and fighter planes guarding any presume enemy AC carrier
has anyone ever considered the obvious option of Using another carrier group to sink an aircraft carrier.
If you look at the history of Aircraft carriers.
Most aircraft carriers were in fact sunk by other Aircraft carrier.(the aircraft operating from them)
There have been advances in technology since WW2. But that works both ways
Carrier groups are are usually fairly well rounded.
There really is not a Golden bullet to destroy a carrier.
A nuclear weapon does not count as once you open fire using a nuke(nukes counter all conventional weapons). Then you just opened the door that leads to mutual destruction
Keep in mind that these are not true aircraft carriers in the sense that they were designed to aircraft carriers, rather they came from modified battleship or other platforms. Post WW II aircraft carriers are truly designed to be aircraft carriers and the lessons learned from WW II enabled their engineerings to be highly resistant to flooding which is the death knell for ships. To sink a nuclear powered aircraft carrier would require the ship to be standing still and take it, not maneuvering and with its defenses going full tilt.I'm not entirely sure that most carriers were sunk by other carriers. Submarines feature rather prominently. And of carriers hit by aircraft, quite a few actually sunk only after a 'coup de grace' by sub- or surface launched torpedo or scuttling. With the Japanese, keep in mind also that by war's end, a lot of antishipping is done by non-carrier based aircraft. The fact that allied air supremacy allows for a large number of carriers beying sunk by aircraft does not mean that these are the most suited weapon.
US WW2 carrier losses
Fleet carriers
USS LANGLEY (CV-1) - Sunk February 22, 1942 (Java Sea)
Japanese aircraft attacked her. She was struck by 5 bomb hits. Abandoned and then sunk by U.S. destroyers with guns and torpedoes.
USS LEXINGTON (CV-2) - Sunk May 8, 1942 (Coral Sea)
Japanese aircraft attacked her. She was struck by two torpedoes and two bombs. Abandoned then finished off with five torpedoes a U.S. destroyer.
USS YORKTOWN (CV-5) - Sunk June 8, 1942 (Midway).
Struck by 5 bombs and 2 torpedoes by Japanese planes. Remained afloat but finished off when struck by 3 of 4 torpedoes fired by the Japanese submarine I-168.
USS WASP (CV-7) - Sunk September 15, 1942. (Guadalcanal)
Hit by 2 torpedoes fired from a Japanese submarine I-19. Abandoned then sunk by U.S. destroyer Lansdowne
USS HORNET (CV-8) - Sunk October 26, 1942 (Solomon Islands)
Struck by 2 air launched torpedoes then one of the first Kamikazi's of the war. Final "coup de grace" administered by a Japanese destroyer with four "long-lance" torpedoes.
<snipped>
Haze Gray & Underway World Aircraft Carrier Lists
Keep in mind that these are not true aircraft carriers in the sense that they were designed to aircraft carriers, rather they came from modified battleship or other platforms. Post WW II aircraft carriers are truly designed to be aircraft carriers and the lessons learned from WW II enabled their engineerings to be highly resistant to flooding which is the death knell for ships. To sink a nuclear powered aircraft carrier would require the ship to be standing still and take it, not maneuvering and with its defenses going full tilt.
i am not just talking about sinking down out a single AC but the whole group of destroyers,frigates,corvettes,missile boats and submarines all around it for its defence itand all on suicide mission!! May be it will cost more $$ than a ACC to ACC hunters by involving such massive force dedicated only to kill ACC.
If i am a coastal navy i will never go for ACC group in blue waters for non linear, force on force, sea control, fleet war. Rather i will wait and emphasis to deny their delivery of goods (marines, soldiers, means of war) and services (missile and air strike from sea, c2I) by counter force, anti scouting thus will try to make delivery a staggering burden. Asymmetric counter force sudden and stealthy attacks will be the key to slow the superior navy's control over littoral water and further force them to labour intensive, time consuming and thankless blockade and inspection.
By 2020, I see India being the second largest AC operator in the world and believe me india won't stop after these 4 ACs.
India will only lag behind in the field of Submarines and will not be able to catch up china or USA by 2050.
i think best option will be submarine if sub get enough depth in which aircraft battlr groups destroyers sonar cant see it and when sub reach near to AC it should fire some torpedos to it or atleat 5 subs lauch attack on battle group than the possibillity of succes will be increase because when other subs engage other ships of battle group than battle groups destroyer will be busy to saving themselves thats the time when one sub should launch attack on aircraft carrier
yes a nuclear torpedo is best option and even if it is intercepted and destroyed the resulting nuclear blast would raise 100 m tidal waves enough to overwhelm the whole carrier group
Why we need to sink the ship. A small attack on the control tower or flight deck will make it just useless.