How The Jamiat Ulama-I-Hind Fought Against The Partition Of India

[suresh1773]

yeah they face some in pakistan and we trying our best correct our mistakes..

Some??????,Every new and then there are attacks on Shias,Hazaras and Ahmediyas.

but still we are not killing anybody for eating pork or for drinking alcohal..

Ask the Hazaras and Ahmediyas,why are they killed

there are no openly ghar wapsi type movements.we gave hindu marraige code and in your country hindus want remove muslim personal law code instead of making correction in it.

Everything is heavily Islamicized whether it is trade,commerce,maths and History. Next is Islamic banking. Mullahs demand religious column in passports

 

[airmarshal]

JUH had no political vision. Madani's ideals were based on assumptions.

Jinnah had politically evolved into thinking about separate homeland for Muslims. He was the biggest proponent of Indian nationalism than any prominent Hindu leader. But his ideas were constantly rejected by Hindu politicians for him being a Mussalman. Disheartened, he began to realize Indian nationalism is a false dream and India under colonialism had changed. This nationalism was based on religion and the identity it provides. He was dejected and left politics to practice law in England. It was Iqbal who convinced him to take leadership of IML because Muslim on the other hand were a quarreling bunch of buffoons who needed leadership.

I m quoting this from Stanley Wolpert book.

 

[darksider]

Some??????,Every new and then there are attacks on Shias,Hazaras and Ahmediyas.

Ask the Hazaras and Ahmediyas,why are they killed
Everything is heavily Islamicized whether it is trade,commerce,maths and History. Next is Islamic banking. Mullahs demand religious column in passports

hazaras and shias are muslims they are not minority first correct your information.its a sectarian rift between sects.we will get rid of this near future Insha Allah.
yeah qadyanis are minority.but can you tell me any recent incident where a qadyani got killed?are they prohibited from their religious activities?is there any incident when someone demolishes their religious center?they are financially very strong in Pakistan.not third-grade citizens like indian Muslims.

our trade,commerce system is like any other country in world.i dont got what is islamised in it?
islamic bacnking is happening every where in world.many muslims dont want invest in intrest based profit schemes because its prohibited in islam.but still there are few products are interest free and nobody forcing even a muslim to invest in intrest free products.

extremist molvis want many things like hindu extremist want.its freedom of speech you know. but still better than having sex with dead Muslim women.

about history, we are Islamic country so our history will have Islamic touch.but we all know our history very well so no worry.

i did not get the math point can you explain more?

you avoid my this

there is no openly ghar wapsi type movements.we gave hindu marriage code and in your country, hindus want to remove muslim personal law code instead of making the correction in it.

can you give any justification?

 

[Tea addict]

As a Pakistani Muslim living in Pakistan I don't have to face things like gaow rakhsha etc etc There are alot of religious freedom we have in Pakistan as a Muslim, which it seems Muslims in India do not enjoy.

However, counter argument to this is 220 million Pakistan, 200 million Bangladeshi and 250 million Indian Muslims comes to 670 million, which is more or less the majority or you can say not less than the hindus. So yes muslim power in India was weaken.

What would have happen, had their been no partition??? Well it might have resulted in Muslim rule in whole of India, or a very powerful muslim presences. It might have resulted in a civil war, massacre etc.

So in the end, i believe no one can predict who was right.

Partition is a reality now, so lets not debate on it. One thing I am clear about it is that undoing partition is not possible and will be the biggest disaster this world would have seen.

I also think partition saved south asia from lot of bloodshed.. In 1947, within few weeks, one million people died from both sides by swords, knives and some farming tool. Now compare that to what we call a disaster in modern world, Syrian civil war, in 7 years 4 lakh people have died when they are using modern firearms, missiles, aircraft bombings and all.
If there would have been no partition in 1947, and say it has to happen today, with all the modern firearms, missiles, foreign agencies, organized communication (internet, cellphone).. It will results in a bloodshed like a world has never seen.. So yes partition was a good thing for both.

 

[prashantazazel]

yeah they face some in pakistan and we trying our best correct our mistakes.
but still we are not killing anybody for eating pork or for drinking alcohal.there are no openly ghar wapsi type movements.we gave hindu marraige code and in your country hindus want remove muslim personal law code instead of making correction in it.

We are trying to modernise . Religious laws have no place in secular countries.