I am going to leave this thread before I end up overheating. I know lot of you guy's go to Afghan forums and hear all the repulsive comments you hear about Pakistan. You got to understand there is a split inside that country along Tajik/Uzbek,Mongol Hazara and Pashtuns. The Tajik absolutely hate Pakistan. You will not find more hatred of Pakistan than Abdullah Abdullah of Norther Alliance. Don't forget we supported Taliban against NA and in doing so we jioned in centuries old rivalries and hatred.
Since 2001 NA have effectively formed the government in Kabul and what they have done is focussed on hatred of Pakistan as a excuse to redeem all the blood letting they did between each other. It suits them to blame everything on Pakistan conveniently ignoring that they failed that is why they are in the impasse they are in today. So don't take it too seriously.
We should counter that by making our western borders better developed that they look like shining examples of progress. Watch how all of Afghanistan will want to come to Pakistan and slowly it will get integrated into Pakistan.
So stop using "Afghans" as a tool to doubt or malign any community inside Pakistan. I could very easily start pointing out about the Muslims in India who mostly support the Bharat. The Indian's Muslims are found in Indian Army, government indeed their President was Muslim.
@Atanz I do not agree that Ayub Khan was the best leader of the country. He stood against Fatima Jinnah and that is enough to call him a autocratic dictator. The Jinnah family should not have been shoved aside the way it was by Ayub Khan. I do not have a positive view of said person. I believe Qayyum Ali Khan and Abdur Rab Nishtar were much better representatives of pashtun community rather than Ayub Khan.
Merely standing against any person ( albeit famous ) does not make him bad. His performance is the
yardstick I use.
And do you support
nepotism? Why and how was Jinnah's family
qualified? Surely that is the antithesis of any claim to democracy? By qualifying a candidate because of their
relationship to deceased figure is a form of
furthering autocracy.
Is that not another form of "Bhuttoism" where one family ends up with franchise?
Ps. I would like to think of Ayub as having "stood for Pakistan" then any particular group.