What's new

How Isreal attacked Gaza Hospital, My assessment.

JDAM strike is kinetic strike, High Explosive dropped in high Altitude , you will have crater, dirt/ground displacement and mangled wreckage, none of these are in the aftermath video.

What are in the aftermath video is what looks like a fuel fire, the car in the hospital wreckage looks like this

View attachment 963197

View attachment 963196

First thing you can see is the hood was blown open, this is due to the internal pressure going outward, you have fire build up inside the boot and the pressure has to escape somewhere, it blown outward until the lock of the boot gave, it got bang out, if this is an explosion from the outside, the pressure wave will push stuff Inward, not Outward, because the pressure generated by the explosion outside pushes stuff in.

Another tell-tale sign is the car in the Gaza Explosion have the char mark on the internal, door, roof and more importantly not the side panel suggested the fire was inside instead of outside and the fire vented out thru the window.

And this is what JDAM done to a tank

View attachment 963200
The famous photo of T-55 in the Highway of Death in Iraq

Kinetic Explosion mangle wreckage because it literally bombard every molecule of an item, it will tore thru the object inside the blast zone, if a tank is going to be tore thru like this, image what will a civilian car be like. The wreckage won't be this intact for you to be able to identify as a car.

This is not JDAM, this is some kind of Fuel Fire
The outside fuel fire can be caused by the fuel inside the vehicles, ignited after the blast.
 
Last edited:
. .
The outside fuel fire can be caused by the fuel inside the vehicles, ignited after the blast.
True, but then where or how the leak was done in the first place, I don't see any protrusion damage on anywhere, the car is literally intact You can't ignite anything if there is not a leak to begin with, and you need external damage at least to have a leak if that is from an outside factor. You need to puncture either the fuel line or fuel tank to have a leak, a car wouldn't leak petrol normally. Those damage are missing.

Otherwise the only other explanation if not a fuel fire, then all the car just simultaneously leak and combusted.....
 
.
It depends on the fuze you are using on the JDAM

Zionist regime "tried" to play smart, normaly their JDAMs have impact fuze and leaves massive 5- 15 feet craters, they used Proximity fuze, which means that the JDAM MK31 fuze was a proximity fuze, exploded in the air, most likely 20 feet above ground to cause maximum carnage to the personals. Impact fuzes are used to destroy buildings bunkers, Proximity fuzes are used with High explosive, fuel mixed, to cause maximum human casualties...

They played their hand, but people are not idiots to decipher their games..
 
.
It depends on the fuze you are using on the JDAM

Zionist regime "tried" to play smart, normaly their JDAMs have impact fuze and leaves massive 5- 15 feet craters, they used Proximity fuze, which means that the JDAM MK31 fuze was a proximity fuze, exploded in the air, most likely 20 feet above ground to cause maximum carnage to the personals. Impact fuzes are used to destroy buildings bunkers, Proximity fuzes are used with High explosive, fuel mixed, to cause maximum human casualties...

They played their hand, but people are not idiots to decipher their games..
Airburst still would create shrapnel damage, which is what these wreckage lacking.

You would have at least found the shrapnel made by the casing of the bomb to be punch thru those car, again, those car are clean, I don't see any damage other than fire damage, how do you explain that?
 
.

hospital-sat-1017-Artboard_1.jpg


This does not look like a JDAM strike. This is something else.
If this is the video of the hospital tragedy, it appears to be a fire and not an explosion. Many flimsy structures are still standing intact. That wouldn't be with an explosion. It may not be an act of war, just a tragic accident.
 
.
Airburst still would create shrapnel damage, which is what these wreckage lacking.

You would have at least found the shrapnel made by the casing of the bomb to be punch thru those car, again, those car are clean, I don't see any damage other than fire damage, how do you explain that?
Not neccesarily, does not have to have sharpnels, can be HEm similar to napalm with proximity fuze
 
.
True, but then where or how the leak was done in the first place, I don't see any protrusion damage on anywhere, the car is literally intact You can't ignite anything if there is not a leak to begin with, and you need external damage at least to have a leak if that is from an outside factor. You need to puncture either the fuel line or fuel tank to have a leak, a car wouldn't leak petrol normally. Those damage are missing.

Otherwise the only other explanation if not a fuel fire, then all the car just simultaneously leak and combusted.....
There is a lot of sharpnel damage all around.
 
. .
Not neccesarily, does not have to have sharpnels, can be HEm similar to napalm with proximity fuze
You WILL have shrapnel, either from the casing or form the damage from the surrounding, even Napalm have shrapnel.

Also if it was Napalm, then you will have the entire car charred, not just near the window......

There is a lot of sharpnel damage all around.
Not on the car tho? IN fact, not on most of the cars?

Hospital itself have nothing to burn those cars, I mean bomb hit a hospital will not eject fuel.......
 
. .
If this is the video of the hospital tragedy, it appears to be a fire and not an explosion. Many flimsy structures are still standing intact. That wouldn't be with an explosion. It may not be an act of war, just a tragic accident.
it would ve been a tragic accident if it was during peace time. during war its a war related accident.. try not to come up with excuses, i know you are trying very hard
 
. . . .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom