How East Bengalis Got East Asian

[Nilgiri]

Such as?

You always had animosity to proven order (unlike the Vedic kingdoms) at a level frankly unknown elsewhere. It is why you were really late in moving to Iron age compared to rest of subcontinent....were much more accepting of token Buddhism (rather than making use of any locally developed order for social utility) and hence why you quite easily abandoned any culture you developed as well when Khilji came by (hence creating the final chasm in West non-delta Bengal and delta East BD by root religion/philosophy in first place). When you develop nothing in your psyche and root culture, you just become driftwood in a sea of fear and uncertainty....and others can sense it without even knowing the history.

Ask yourself why Chalukyas were always able to evenly match and even defeat the Cholas on occasion....but the path of least resistance for both their expansions in the subcontinent was along the Eastern coast and the delta?..and with considerable ease too? Only Mughal empire managed to create the stability and protection needed for Bengal (esp delta part) to reach some semblance of a zenith....nothing really came from within.

Anga Desh in the Mahabharat is literally gifted as next to nothing for a reason....and that too its just a small rump part to the west of the Delta itself at that point. The eastern fringe of Ganges river and Delta itself always had this peculiar spot in hierarchy. There is not enough diverse habitation and environment from the get go...exacerbated by flood and frequency of such natural calamity yearly....completely open to be preyed upon by both man and nature like this....and thus a complex is built up over centuries...likely embedded in the 5HT receptors genetically.

You will need to prove your mettle (than devolve into more of the same causal attitude) now to fix it...you need some perception, awakening and sustained break out as an entire people for some chance at changing this....just 1 - 2 generations wont fix millenia of this....but maybe many more could.

Just my opinion, TIFWIW.

@Desert Fox @Psychic @django

 

[DarkPrince]

You always had animosity to proven order (unlike the Vedic kingdoms) at a level frankly unknown elsewhere. It is why you were really late in moving to Iron age compared to rest of subcontinent....were much more accepting of token Buddhism (rather than making use of any locally developed order for social utility) and hence why you quite easily abandoned any culture you developed as well when Khilji came by (hence creating the final chasm in West non-delta Bengal and delta East BD by root religion/philosophy in first place). When you develop nothing in your psyche and root culture, you just become driftwood in a sea of fear and uncertainty....and others can sense it without even knowing the history.

Ask yourself why Chalukyas were always able to evenly match and even defeat the Cholas on occasion....but the path of least resistance for both their expansions in the subcontinent was along the Eastern coast and the delta?..and with considerable ease too? Only Mughal empire managed to create the stability and protection needed for Bengal (esp delta part) to reach some semblance of a zenith....nothing really came from within.

Anga Desh in the Mahabharat is literally gifted as next to nothing for a reason....and that too its just a small rump part to the west of the Delta itself at that point. The eastern fringe of Ganges river and Delta itself always had this peculiar spot in hierarchy. There is not enough diverse habitation and environment from the get go...exacerbated by flood and frequency of such natural calamity yearly....completely open to be preyed upon by both man and nature like this....and thus a complex is built up over centuries...likely embedded in the 5HT receptors genetically.

You will need to prove your mettle (than devolve into more of the same causal attitude) now to fix it...you need some perception, awakening and sustained break out as an entire people for some chance at changing this....just 1 - 2 generations wont fix millenia of this....but maybe many more could.

Just my opinion, TIFWIW.

We Bangladeshis are Indians no question about that.

 

[Michael Corleone]

Khan has equivalent meanings such as "commander", "leader", or "ruler", "king" and "chief". Now days its just another family title...

Nowadays all mofos name themselves khan or chaudhury to set themselves apart from the rest... I could give zero fucks about someone’s family name really.

In fact many in central asia take pride in Genghis ancestry. Why do you think there are so many fake khans in the world ?

Because most Asians are lowlife uncultured swines who like to see themselves in superior light among the rest of themselves. I give zero fucks about someone’s family name

 

[Flynn Swagmire]

Nowadays all mofos name themselves khan or chaudhury to set themselves apart from the rest... I could give zero fucks about someone’s family name really.

#MeToo

 

[bluesky]

In fact many in central asia take pride in Genghis ancestry. Why do you think there are so many fake khans in the world ?

By reading the feature below, I am thinking @TopCat may also be a descendant of great Chengiz Khan who died 800 years ago. But, most of his descendants are the natives of Mongolia, central Asia, and China. where they number about 16 million.


UK news
The Observer
We owe it all to superstud Genghis Khan
Warlord Khan has 16m male relatives alive now, says a study
Robin McKie, science editor
Sun 2 Mar 2003 09.50 GMTFirst published on Sun 2 Mar 2003 09.50 GMT
Shares

One in every 200 men alive today is a relative of Genghis Khan. An international team of geneticists has made the astonishing discovery that more than 16 million men in central Asia have the same male Y chromosome as the great Mongol leader.
It is a striking finding: a huge chunk of modern humanity can trace its origins to Khan's vigorous policy of claiming the most beautiful women captured during his merciless conquest.

'One thirteenth-century Persian historian claimed that within a century of Khan's birth, his enthusiastic mating habits had created a lineage of more than 20,000 individuals,' said team leader Dr Chris Tyler-Smith. 'That now appears to account for around 8% of the men in central Asia.'

The team, from Britain, Italy, China and Uzbekistan, took tissue samples from 2,000 men from central Asia, and studied each one's Y chromosome, the genetic package that confers maleness and is passed only from father to son.
'Y chromosomes belonging to different men vary slightly. One in every 5,000 DNA units is not the same,' said Tyler-Smith. 'But when we looked at our results, we found a huge group that did not show any differences. We were absolutely amazed.'

One researcher, Tatiana Zerjal, even suggested they had found the genetic footprint of Khan. 'It was just a joke,' added Tyler-Smith. 'Then we began to look more closely at our results, and realised it was the only really feasible explanation for what we had found.'

First the team, whose results are published in the latest edition of the American Journal of Human Genetics, found the geographical spread of possessors of the chromosomes almost exactly matched that of Genghis's empire, which stretched from China to the Middle East. Then they discovered that all of these men shared a common ancestor. Again the answer was consistent with the march of Khan, who lived between 1162 and 1227.
'There are only two ways a single Y chromosome can make such a mark on a population,' Tyler-Smith said. 'The chromosome could in some way confer its owners with some biological advantage. But given that a Y chromosome is little more than a biochemical switch that turns an embryo into a male child, it is hard to see how it could have such an effect.

'The other explanation is that its original possessor had some incredible social advantage over other Y chromosome possessors, allowing its owner to pass it on, over and over again. Khan fits that bill perfectly. He had many wives, and was enthusiastic in his attentions to other women.

When Mongol armies attacked, their spoils were shared among the troops and officers, with one exception. The most beautiful women were reserved for Chengiz Khan.

The study also sided with the Hazara people of northern Pakistan, whose claim to be direct descendants of Khan is derided by historians. It found the Hazaras' Y chromosomes were identical to those they had already linked to Khan.

'It is not the first time the oral tradition has been proved more reliable than academic treatise,' he added. 'It takes the power of genetics to prove it, however.

 

[nang2]

Probably make sense. Historically, where Vietnam and Cambodia are now was the battleground between Indian culture and Chinese culture.

 

[Nilgiri]

We Bangladeshis are Indians no question about that.

There are lot of types of Indians....you are just on real low level historically (if you want to tag along when its convenient).

Its fixable today since we have hindsight to learn from....but you need to fix it to prove it instead of blah blah feelz.

 

[bluesky]

Do not pretend. The complex came from Indian Muslims. In your society , The Syeds ( majority of whom are fake) claim ancestry from Muhammad. Same complex.

So, pray to tell us who really are the descendants of Bibi Fatema and Hazrat Ali? As far as I know, they denote themselves as Syeds throughout the Muslim societies.

 

[Michael Corleone]

#MeToo

that hashtag is only appropriate if your pastor played with your little johnny against your wishes.

 

[Flynn Swagmire]

that hashtag is only appropriate if your pasture played with your little johnny against your wishes.

You are anti semitic...

 

[Michael Corleone]

You are anti semitic...

i'm talking about catholics bruv

 

[Flynn Swagmire]

i'm talking about catholics bruv

You are anti christ...

 

[Michael Corleone]

You are anti christ...

haha! xD what are you? the pope? where is the popemobile?

 

[Bilal9]

OK guys - let's keep the conversation on topic. Enough with church clergy abuse etc.

 

[Śakra]

Most bangledashis are adivasis.