angeldemon_007
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2010
- Messages
- 5,298
- Reaction score
- 0
After much deliberation on the Armys request to specify rules of engagement with Maoists before its troops can be stationed in Chhattisgarh, the government has agreed to frame guidelines.
This could, for the first time, define the contours of legal cover for the military in an area where the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) has not been invoked.
Last year, the Cabinet Committee on Security cleared an Army battle manoeuvre range on the edge of the Maoist-dominated Abujhmad forest. This was meant only for training, not for operations. But the Army said it needed clear-cut norms on what it could do and what it couldnt if it came into conflict with Maoists.
The CCS also cleared a sub-area headquarters in Raipur and a training facility in Bilaspur.
An uncomfortable Chhattisgarh government initially sought to explain that acting in self-defence is covered by the Indian Penal Code but the Army said that the IPC does not provide enough of a legal cushion given the complexity on the ground.
After several rounds of talks between the Army, Defence Ministry and the Chhattisgarh government, it has now been decided to frame mutually acceptable guidelines.
While the Army used the term rules of engagement when it first flagged off the issue three months ago, the government has said it would prefer to call it guidelines for training as thats the stated purpose of deployment.
Given the strong support Maoists have among some NGOs and activists, the Army is wary it may get embroiled in legal disputes were an incident to take place.
It was, in fact, for this reason that South Block had strongly opposed the initial Home Ministry proposal to have the military carry out active operations against the Maoists.
Even now, the Armys case is that it has a way of functioning in areas of potential conflict. One of its first moves will be to reach out to the local population for its own security needs and that, in itself, could provoke the Maoists to strike back. The Army has also communicated that it will not necessarily wait to be attacked first and would prefer to have the freedom to make pre-emptive moves.
How do we engage with Maoists? Army asks govt
This could, for the first time, define the contours of legal cover for the military in an area where the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) has not been invoked.
Last year, the Cabinet Committee on Security cleared an Army battle manoeuvre range on the edge of the Maoist-dominated Abujhmad forest. This was meant only for training, not for operations. But the Army said it needed clear-cut norms on what it could do and what it couldnt if it came into conflict with Maoists.
The CCS also cleared a sub-area headquarters in Raipur and a training facility in Bilaspur.
An uncomfortable Chhattisgarh government initially sought to explain that acting in self-defence is covered by the Indian Penal Code but the Army said that the IPC does not provide enough of a legal cushion given the complexity on the ground.
After several rounds of talks between the Army, Defence Ministry and the Chhattisgarh government, it has now been decided to frame mutually acceptable guidelines.
While the Army used the term rules of engagement when it first flagged off the issue three months ago, the government has said it would prefer to call it guidelines for training as thats the stated purpose of deployment.
Given the strong support Maoists have among some NGOs and activists, the Army is wary it may get embroiled in legal disputes were an incident to take place.
It was, in fact, for this reason that South Block had strongly opposed the initial Home Ministry proposal to have the military carry out active operations against the Maoists.
Even now, the Armys case is that it has a way of functioning in areas of potential conflict. One of its first moves will be to reach out to the local population for its own security needs and that, in itself, could provoke the Maoists to strike back. The Army has also communicated that it will not necessarily wait to be attacked first and would prefer to have the freedom to make pre-emptive moves.
How do we engage with Maoists? Army asks govt