Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The returning Chinese scientist and tech experts also contributed to the modernization of China.Here is the irony after 40 years of Chinese modernization.
Today, China holds all of the high-technology that Taiwan possesses.
There are now two sources of high-technology. It no longer has to be a tech transfer from Taiwan. China has absorbed all of the Taiwanese technologies.
No country will ever receive a meaningful technological transfer from barren South Korea or Japan.
Taiwan has proven over the last 40 years that it will only transfer technology to China.
The United States has numerous restrictions on tech transfer. CFIUS is only part of the US control mechanism. Other aspects include US EULA (end user licensing agreement). The US is very different from Taiwan/China. The sale of an American technological item is really only a lease. The EULA controls how and where the American technology can be used. Typically, transfer of American technological equipment (such as a supercomputer) to a third party requires US government approval.
To date, I have not seen China express any willingness to meaningfully transfer its high-technology to another country.
Thus, the Taiwan Economic Miracle was the original progenitor. Massive amounts of Taiwanese technology migrated to mainland China from 1978-2017. I have seen no evidence of further migration of Taiwanese or Chinese high technology. Thus, no other country in the world has meaningfully industrialized in the last 40 years.
There must be a source for advanced high-technology. Otherwise, it will take decades to slowly replicate the technology. For example, today's India does not have a commercial semiconductor fabrication plant. One billion Indians have ZERO commercial semiconductor fabrication capability.
Obtaining high-technology is nearly impossible. Countries will not part with their crown jewels. Taiwan's Hans made an exception for China's Hans. That's it.
We are unlikely to see another country industrialize in our lifetime, unless China is willing to industrialize them and provide a huge tech transfer.
----------
China's industrialization was an ethnic Han technological transfer. No other country in the world can experience a similar Han-technological transfer. Thus, China's industrialization isn't really a model for anyone.
Saudi Arabia has plenty of oil money. Saudi Arabia has built universities to improve its country's technology. Nothing happened. Why? Basic science is meaningless. It is the technological trade secrets that are really important.
Russia has an educated populace of 142 million. Russia also has hundreds of billions of oil wealth. Russia can't catch the US/Taiwan/China. Russia is not a manufacturing power. Why not? Russia has more money than Hong Kong can ever dream of. Money is not the issue. Technology is the problem. Where can Russia buy the advanced semiconductor and electronics technology that it needs? There is no such supplier.
Money cannot buy advanced technology. Thus, Russia is stuck being an oil exporter and not a world manufacturing powerhouse.
Since 1971, Taiwan has earned large trade surpluses. Taiwan is world #4 in holding USPTO patents. Taiwan invented the improved technologies for all of the sectors that Taiwan dominates today. Could China have contested Taiwan's supremacy in these high-tech sectors after 1978 on its own. The answer is clearly "no." Taiwan didn't even care about the possibility of wealthy Europeans or Russians challenging Taiwan's high-tech dominance.
The only country that is superior to Taiwan technologically in semiconductors and electronics is the United States. I need to put an asterisk next to the preceding sentence. Taiwan TSMC's 3nm fab, scheduled to be operational in 2022, will be the world's most advanced semiconductor fabrication plant. Taiwan is a monster in advanced technology. China benefited by sharing a common ethnicity with Taiwan's Hans.
Taiwan's Hans worked hard for their dominant export position in many advanced technologies (such as CNC machine tools, logic-chip semiconductor fabrication, specialty chemicals, etc.). Taiwan's engineers generously upgraded mainland China's technological base.
In 1978, mainland China was one of the poorest nations in the world. China's civilian technology was in really bad shape. There is no way to go from a backwards nation to a pre-eminent manufacturing superpower without an infusion of high-technology from somebody. That somebody was Taiwan's Hans.
This is civilian tech. China had to develop it's own military tech which is a lot more difficult than civilian tech.IC is one of high-technology industry, but not everything, do not brag too much, we all know what's USA doing in Taiwan's IC industry history.
OP is
How did China transform from a poor country into the world's second largest economy?
better focus on Billion PP's Economy overall. keep talking about 20 Million PP(Taiwan)'s role is like Spamming.
The thread title is: How did China transform from a poor country into the world's second-largest economy? The answer is Taiwan.
I am very serious and not joking.Are you Kiddddding me ????
@Kyle Sun @Martian2 it's obvious that a combination of factors helped with China's development. First, China had higher work ethics and higher IQ resulting in a small learning curve that made the transition easier. Secondly, the foundation was already set by Mao and Deng for modernization. Taiwan tech, HK money, overseas Chinese money, returning educated Chinese Patriots, and sound centralized planning of resource allocation made the transformation nothing less than a miracle. This will not be repeated by any other countries. Hats off to all the patriotic Chinese who contributed to China's success.
There were good plannings by the central government during the past 30 years. For example no Taiwanese companies is needed to swear to be loyal to the CCP as Taiwan was under KMT during that era, so they were allowed to do whatever they want with government support and the CCP also build up the infrastructure to lessen to cost of setting up factories. I doubt China would grow as fast if there are elections every 4 years and every time there may be a change of government officials.