How can Pakistan Navy defend itself from Brahmos cruse missile ?

[randomradio]

Yup someone sure is in denial!!

http://www.military-today.com/missiles/brahmos.htm

http://www.brahmos.com/content.php?id=10&sid=10

http://www.janes.com/article/60876/india-aims-to-supply-brahmos-cruise-missiles-to-vietnam

http://www.janes.com/article/45334/brahmos-tested-to-the-limit-id14d1

Yes it must be me as thehindu is far more reliable then janes, military today and all those other sources out there.

Just like always, debating anything with you is a futile exercise.
Looking forward for an excuse to deny all these sources,, NOT!!

So DRDO Chief is not a source? All these websites are sources? Right. Please continue living in denial.

290Km is only the official figure. The actual figure was always more than that.

http://rbth.com/science_and_tech/20...rsonic_missiles_behave_like_wolves_28781.html

The missiles have a range of more than 372.8 miles.

It has a range of 608Km. Brahmos was made from the P-800. At least this should prove it.

 

[Arsalan]

they will not understand you sir

You were right!!

 

[asif_hussain]

Dear you need to get all those sources updated then if you have suddenly realized the true range of the missile
ALL the sources clearly state 290 Km as range and by future projects i means Brahmos NG and II and those too have same claimed range of 290 KM. Now either you have access to some highly sensitive information or are just misguided/guiding!
Dont take my word for it,, just look it up on internet and search on the most respectable of sources if you want to. The operational range of Brahmos is 290 KM, if it is because of software of because the fuel is expensive so they just put that much in it is not what i am concerned with.


Yup i understand this. Just stating what the official claims are and that is it
Surely you can fire one without a warhead to go even a little bit further but perhaps there is a good reason people mentioned operational range when talking about there systems and i think it is appropriate to use that don't you think?

official figures are always not the way to go here countries always underscore them or overstate them depending on what kind of situation they are in for example the official range of agni V is given as 5000kms while it weighs almost 50 tonnes same as a minuteman 3 you can pretty much figure out whats going on here the popeye missile or popeye turbo to be precise have official stated range of 300 kms but its actual range is 2500+ Kms i mean nobody uses a nuclear tipped CM with that low a range especially when its a under water SLCM i guess its the same with ALCM raad used by pakistan its also capable of hitting in excess of 500Kms but stated range is 350 Kms if i reckon.

 

[satishkumarcsc]

they will not understand you sir


so you have no answer for me, you are nothing but just a keyboard warrior

Well I am not going to waste my time on you.

Why don't you first read about the development of the Chinese missiles and ESSM, Barak 1 and Umkhonto before you come and talk to me. And you can understand why I have my doubts regarding the Chinese weapon systems to intercept a salvo fire of Bhramos. You will then understand why Barak 8 and the Sea RAM are a much better option compared to the above missiles I have mentioned.

Above all read about the flight profile and end phase maneuvers of all antiship missiles and flight profiles. Yhen come and discuss about why I am right.

 

[randomradio]

official figures are always not the way to go here countries always underscore them or overstate them depending on what kind of situation they are in for example the official range of agni V is given as 5000kms while it weighs almost 50 tonnes same as a minuteman 3 you can pretty much figure out whats going on here the popeye missile or popeye turbo to be precise have official stated range of 300 kms but its actual range is 2500+ Kms i mean nobody uses a nuclear tipped CM with that low a range especially when its a under water SLCM i guess its the same with ALCM raad used by pakistan its also capable of hitting in excess of 500Kms but stated range is 350 Kms if i reckon.

Yeah, it's simple commonsense. Brahmos and P-800 have the same engines and same design. P-800 has a range of 600Km and Brahmos has a range of 300km, officially.

http://www.aame.in/2013/02/brahmos-cruise-missile-not-bound-by.html

Well I am not going to waste my time on you.

Why don't you first read about the development of the Chinese missiles and ESSM, Barak 1 and Umkhonto before you come and talk to me. And you can understand why I have my doubts regarding the Chinese weapon systems to intercept a salvo fire of Bhramos. You will then understand why Barak 8 and the Sea RAM are a much better option compared to the above missiles I have mentioned.

Above all read about the flight profile and end phase maneuvers of all antiship missiles and flight profiles. Yhen come and discuss about why I am right.

Plenty of people around who jump into discussions without knowing much about the subject.

And they also believe the Chinese will hand over their most cutting edge systems to Pak.

 

[asif_hussain]

Yeah, it's simple commonsense. Brahmos and P-800 have the same engines and same design. P-800 has a range of 600Km and Brahmos has a range of 300km, officially.

Sure 300kms officially wink wink

 

[Director General]

Brahmos can easily travel over 500km

 

[randomradio]

official figures are always not the way to go here countries always underscore them or overstate them depending on what kind of situation they are in for example the official range of agni V is given as 5000kms while it weighs almost 50 tonnes same as a minuteman 3 you can pretty much figure out whats going on here the popeye missile or popeye turbo to be precise have official stated range of 300 kms but its actual range is 2500+ Kms i mean nobody uses a nuclear tipped CM with that low a range especially when its a under water SLCM i guess its the same with ALCM raad used by pakistan its also capable of hitting in excess of 500Kms but stated range is 350 Kms if i reckon.

Israeli weapons are overwhelmingly understated. Even SAMs like Barak NG.

 

[asif_hussain]

Israeli weapons are overwhelmingly understated. Even SAMs like Barak NG.

i'd take being understated everyday of the week and twice on sunday an enemy who is very strong but seriously underestimating you is far easy to defeat than a weak level headed enemy

 

[randomradio]

i'd take being understated everyday of the week and twice on sunday an enemy who is very strong but seriously underestimating you is far easy to defeat than a weak level headed enemy

Israel has no choice but to understate weapons capabilities because they can't survive a loss during war.

The Russians overstate export grade weapons while understating critical systems.

India understates in order to stave off external political pressure.

China overstates in order to create the perception that it is a heavy weight.

Everybody has a reason.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Well I am not going to waste my time on you.

Why don't you first read about the development of the Chinese missiles and ESSM, Barak 1 and Umkhonto before you come and talk to me. And you can understand why I have my doubts regarding the Chinese weapon systems to intercept a salvo fire of Bhramos. You will then understand why Barak 8 and the Sea RAM are a much better option compared to the above missiles I have mentioned.

Above all read about the flight profile and end phase maneuvers of all antiship missiles and flight profiles. Yhen come and discuss about why I am right.

kid Chinese weapon system is million times better than yours, this place is not for yours go play your toys

Yeah, it's simple commonsense. Brahmos and P-800 have the same engines and same design. P-800 has a range of 600Km and Brahmos has a range of 300km, officially.

http://www.aame.in/2013/02/brahmos-cruise-missile-not-bound-by.html



Plenty of people around who jump into discussions without knowing much about the subject.

And they also believe the Chinese will hand over their most cutting edge systems to Pak.

kid Chinese weapon system is million times better than yours, this place is not for yours go play your toys
and how do you know that Chinese weapon system is unreliable and junk, and they can't invent, innovate new thing ? and janes other respected defense site are incorrect you guys knows everything about defense matters,others don't what a poor little loser indians

 

[satishkumarcsc]

kid Chinese weapon system is million times better than yours, this place is not for yours go play your toys


kid Chinese weapon system is million times better than yours, this place is not for yours go play your toys
and how do you know that Chinese weapon system is unreliable and junk, and they can't invent, innovate new thing ? and janes other respected defense site are incorrect you guys knows everything about defense matters,others don't what a poor little loser indians

Well you are a waste of time.....as I previously mentioned.

 

[艹艹艹]

中国的鹰击12可以在布拉莫斯发射之前将其干掉
Chinese YJ 12 can kill it in Brahmos before the launch

 

[Ultima Thule]

Well you are a waste of time.....as I previously mentioned.

and you are mine,you haven't a logic to prove that the Chinese system are unreliable and junk
? you just trolling against china, nothing more you stupid,
you have no points to prove anything against China you idiot

中国的鹰击12可以在布拉莫斯发射之前将其干掉
Chinese YJ 12 can kill it in Brahmos before the launch

They will not understand you sir, they think all of Chinese weapon system are junk and unreliable, they are blind and the state of denial and lives in their fools paradise

 

[艹艹艹]

and you are mine,you haven't a logic to prove that the Chinese system are unreliable and junk
? you just trolling against china, nothing more you stupid,
you have no points to prove anything against China you idiot


They will not understand you sir, they think all of Chinese weapon system are junk and unreliable, they are blind and the state of denial and lives in their fools paradise