What's new

How Blockchain could have averted Biggest Banking Scam in India

Kabira

BANNED
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
14,383
Reaction score
-20
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
This article is in connection with the largest banking scam that sprung up in my country India very recently. A businessman, Nirav Modi looted an entire national bank (Punjab National Bank) alleged worth ₹11,400 Crore INR ($1.8 bn).

What is Nirav Modi getting framed for?

Basically, a junior level Mumbai branch official issued Letters of Undertakings wrongfully on behalf of companies associated with Nirav Modi. What Letters of Undertaking do is that they empower companies to get buyer credit (loan) from foreign Indian banks to import material into India. So this Nirav guy got loan in foreign currency WITHOUT any collateral. And this money was NEVER used to import goods in India. Rather Nirav used to repay loans from other banks!

How did this go unnoticed up until now when it had been going on since 2011?
So when the junior level official sent the instructions to foreign banks, it was done via messaging system known as (SWIFT) Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication. This system is de facto trusted by all the banks over the world without any question. Why? Because it is endorsed by supervisors before instructions are issued.

The turning point:
These instructions were NOT logged on PNB’s core banking system. Infosysbacks up the technology of PNB’s banking and financial system.

This meant that the instructions, essentially promises to other banks that Punjab National Bank would pay them back for credit extended to Nirav Modi, were not noticed by the PNB management.
So how did the bank figure it out?
When Nirav Modi’s companies again sought Letter of Undertaking, they were asked to provide 110% cash margin as security. Nirav Modi’s companies told the bank that they had been availing the facility of Letter of Undertaking without providing any cash margin since several years.

THIS RANG THE ALARMS AT AN AMPLITUDE HIGHER THAN THAT OF LOUDEST NOISE ON THE PLANET.

The bank then went through the SWIFT trails to examine what actually had been going on in the branch, and that is when the scam emerged.

So who the hell pays for this mess?
Right now, the pressure is on other foreign Indian banks who lent the money and not PNB. But those banks are not at fault because they doled out money based on SWIFT instructions.

Allahabad Bank, which is believed to have the largest exposure here, has said that its liabilities are with Punjab National Bank and not the individual companies, and so it expects the bank to pay up and does not have to worry about collecting money from Modi’s companies.

There is no straight answer to above question, but ultimately its the common man which has to suffer.


1*WPjFATw1mg-8B7lE9E19WQ.jpeg

Source: http://www.thefunlearning.com/2011/12/cartoons-against-corruption-in-india.html
Blockchain Solution
I think I’ve cribbed enough. Now let’s talk about the solutions.

Key features that gave rise to the scam:

  1. Junior official sending out Letter of Undertaking without any authority: In blockchain, there are smart contracts which will not get executed until specified people have not nodded. For eg, if I say that to sell my house, me and my parents have to agree. So the house won’t get sold if ONLY I agree OR if ONLY my parents agree. The condition is that BOTH of us have to agree.
  2. Bank issued Letter of Undertaking without any security: There was no security kept from Nirav Modi before lending the loan which is TOTALLY against bank’s policies. Here also concept of smart contracts can fit in. Loan will not get approved until and unless securities from the person who is taking the loan are successfully deposited.
  3. None of the transactions got logged on PNB’s banking system: There is a centralised database which has to updated specifically by the bank manually. There are “chances” of manual error. In blockchain, there is only ONE ledger which is ultimate truth. There is no scope of manual error, foul play there.
If I’m missing out on any point in the solution, please comment it below. It’ll be appreciated.

I hope GoI focuses on solutions rather than blaming each other. India needs to rise above all this mess. It is one of the oldest countries in the history of the world yet it is still developing. There has to be a problem. As a citizen of India, I do take pride in my nation. But such incidences where our government and leaders are incompetent, bog me down.

That’s all.

https://hackernoon.com/how-blockchain-could-have-averted-biggest-banking-scam-in-india-9aed823edcc0
 
.
Distributed validation is good for many of these applications, place too much power in one figure and you will see corrupt handling.
 
.
Blockchain in Banking documentation, land and house ownership, export import documentation are the REAL applications where blockchain technology is useful and neccesary. Bitcoin and other crytocurrency manipulation/speculation is the WRONG use of this technology
 
.
Blockchain in Banking documentation, land and house ownership, export import documentation are the REAL applications where blockchain technology is useful and neccesary. Bitcoin and other crytocurrency manipulation/speculation is the WRONG use of this technology

No it's not wrong use, right and wrong are relative. In governments eyes unregulated markets are wrong for their own benefit and that of the banks. Regulation however is healthy and will decrease problems.

In technical terms when you say 'right' and wrong use of blockchain technology you would be referring to permissioned and permissionless ledgers. Permissioned ledgers being that which governments will use. Permissionless ledgers are still very useful.
 
.
Blockchain in Banking documentation, land and house ownership, export import documentation are the REAL applications where blockchain technology is useful and neccesary. Bitcoin and other crytocurrency manipulation/speculation is the WRONG use of this technology

You need cryptocurrency to sustain public blockchain.
 
.
You need cryptocurrency to sustain public blockchain.

You certainly do not. Crytocurrency is a misuse of blockchain. The fact that darkweb criminals and speculators popularised this inappropriate use of blockchain does. Just as you can use a knife for cutting your vegetables or stabbing someone.
 
.
This is why cryptocurrency is needed. Lets say someone develop public ledger/blockchain for land record. To sustain network there will be nodes, kind of like mining. Nodes are run by stacking coins and get rewarded if someone use blockchain to access land record etc

Remember whole point of decentralized blockchain is that isn’t owned by private firms. Normal people can run nodes at home and get rewarded in cryptocurrency if someone use network.

Everytime we send ether someone is getting paid even though I never mined ETH but many others do who help run it and confirm transactions in return of fees in ETH.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom