Bilawal Bhutto
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2017
- Messages
- 296
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
With the respringing of Nazism and Facism round the World in these current times. I condonely mention the United States of the Northern Americas and the Republic of India. Let us take'th a seek with great preciseness of the minds of a mammoth Nazi figure the World hath ever seen'th. He hath lived three score and sixteen years ago with the denomination of Aldolphus Hitler, had'th compressed justifully to Adolf. Adolf Hitler hath exceeding cruel sayings of the Indians peoples durant and enduring his reign over the Duetchslands and her respective territories. These are the latter:
4th February 1945
To tell the truth, I feel much more sympathetically inclined to the lowliest Hindu than to any of these arrogant (British) islanders .
7th February 1945
In them, the white races have imposed their will by force, and the influence they have had on the native inhabitants has been negligible; the Hindus have remained Hindus, the Chinese have remained Chinese, and the Muslims are still Muslims. There have been no profound transformations, and such changes as have occurred are less marked in the religious field, notwithstanding the tremendous efforts of the Christian missionaries, than in any other. There have been a few odd conversions the sincerity of which are open to considerable doubt-except, perhaps in the case of a few simpletons and mentally deficient. The white races did, of course, give some things to the natives, and they were the worst gifts that they could possibly have made, those plagues of our own modern world-materialism, fanaticism, alcoholism and syphilis. For the rest, since these peoples possessed qualities of their own which were superior to anything we could offer them, they have remained essentially unchanged. Colonization is not an activity which Germans feel called upon to pursue,Germany should never make common cause with the colonizing nations and should always abstain from supporting them in their colonial aspirations.
Those quotations are from Hitler's transcribed conversations with his personal secretary Martin Bormann, who was with Hitler in his bunker in the Battle of Berlin and one of the witnesses to the signing of Hitler's Last Will and his marriage to Eva Braun on April 29th, 1945. Bormann was also present in the cremation of Adolf and Eva on April 30th.
That uncharacteristically sympathetic view towards non-Europeans held at theend of his life has to be taken in the context of those last few years; it wasn't Asians or Arabs that repelled his European invasions or reduced Dresden to ashes, it was his fellow 'White' people that did it.
As bizarrely sympathetic as Hitler was in the days before his suicide, he began life with a typical Imperialist attitude of the world, and was a hardcore Anglophile in particular. You could say that his goal was to make Germany as powerful as Britain during the height of their empire.
Here's a look at some of the things Hitler said about non-Europeans (India in particular, as this is what the question asks for. Hitler even makes a comment about Nehru and Bose) from the publishing of Mein Kampf to his transcribed private conversations :
July 1941
Let's learn from the English, who, with two hundred and fifty thousand men in all, including fifty thousand soldiers, govern four hundred million Indians.
17th October 1941
The basic reason for English pride is India. Four hundred years ago the English didn't have this pride. The vast spaces over which they spread their rule obliged them to govern millions of people — and they kept these multitudes in order by granting a few men unlimited power. It would obviously have been impossible for them to keep great European areas supplied with foodstuffs and other articles of prime necessity. In any case, the Anglicans never sustained the slightest effort of a missionary description. Thus it was that the Indians never suffered any attack of this sort upon their spiritual integrity.
.
.
.
What India was for England, the territories of Russia will be for us. If only I could make the German people understand what this space means for our future!
.
.
.
If the English were to be driven out of India, India would perish. Our role in Russia will be analogous to that of England in India.
.
.
.
The Russian space is our India. Like the English, we shall rule this empire with a handful of men.
15th August to 17th September 1941
In this business I shall go straight ahead, cold-bloodedly. What they may think about me, at this juncture, is to me a matter of complete indifference. I don't see why a German who eats a piece of bread should torment himself with the idea that the soil that produces this bread has been won by the sword. When we eat wheat from Canada, we don't think about the despoiled Indians. The precept that it's men's duty to love one another is theory — and the Christians are the last to practise it! A negro baby who has the misfortune to die before a missionary gets his clutches on him, goes to Hell! If that were true, one might well lament that sorrowful destiny: to have lived only three years, and to burn for all eternity with Lucifer!
26th October 1941
To exploit the Ukraine properly — that new Indian Empire — I need only peace in the West. The frontier police will be enough to ensure us the quiet conditions necessary for the exploitation of the conquered territories. I attach no importance to a formal, juridical end to the war on the Eastern Front. If the English are clever, they will seize the psychological moment to make an about-turn — and they will march on our side.
5th January 1941
One of their great bases is Iran, Irak and Syria. That's where their fleet takes on supplies. The other is the Malay archipelago, where they're losing all their refueling -points for oil. They can trumpet abroad their intentions concerning Europe, but they (Britain) know very well that it's the possession of India on which the existence of their Empire depends.
December 1941
Hitler meets with Haj Amin al-Husseini, the leader of the Supreme Muslim Council, which was opposed to British presence in Palestine.
January 1942
The wealth of Great Britain is the result less of a perfect commercial organisation than of the capitalist exploitation of the three hundred and fifty million Indian slaves. The British are commended for their worldly wisdom in respecting the customs of the countries subject to them. In reality, this attitude has no other explanation than the determination not to raise the natives' standard of living. If we took India, the Indians would certainly not be enthusiastic, and they'd not be slow to regret the good old days of English rule! The climax of this cynical behavior of the English is that it gives them the prestige of liberalism and tolerance.The prohibition of suttee for widows, and the suppression of starvation-dungeons, were dictated to the English by the desire not to reduce the labour-force, and perhaps also by the desire to economize wood! They set so cleverly about presenting these measures to the world that they provoked a wave of admiration. That's the strength of the English: to allow the natives to live whilst they exploit them to the uttermost.There's not a single Englishman, at this moment, who isn't thinking constantly of India. If one were to offer the English this alternative, to keep India whilst abandoning Europe to Germany, or to lose India whilst retaining the control of Europe, I'm sure that 99 per cent of them would choose to keep India. For them, India has likewise become a symbol, for it's on India that she built the Empire. Out of four hundred and fifty million subjects, the King of England has three hundred and fifty million Indians.
12th-13th January 1942There are no bloody insurrections in India to-day, but the difficulty for the Indians is to reconcile the divergent interests of such a diverse population.How are the princes and the Brahmins, the Hindus and the Mussulmans, all these hierarchised and partitioned castes to be combined in a common front? If a British newspaper in India writes an article to-day attacking Churchill, that's because it can't do anything else — or it would lose its whole public. The Press doesn't give an exact picture of the reality.
In India, revolt is an endemic condition. Gandhi tried to succeed by pacific methods, but whatever be the methods chosen, the Indians are unanimous in their desire to shake off the British yoke. Some of them would like to try Bolshevism for that purpose, others would like to try us. Others would prefer to owe nothing to the foreigner. For all, the object is the same, it's liberty — and nobody cares about the state of anarchy that will follow in India upon the departure of the English.When one treats a people as the English have continually treated the Indians, the unpardonable folly is to send the youth of the country to the universities, where it learns things that it would be better for it not to know.
3rd March 1942
I read to-day that India at present numbers three hundred and eighty-eight million inhabitants, which means an increase of fifty-five millions during the last ten years. It's alarming. We are witnessing the same phenomenon in Russia. The women there have a child every year. The chief reason for this increase is the reduction in mortality due to the progress made by the health services. What are our doctors thinking of? Isn't it enough to vaccinate the whites? So much the worse for the whites who won't let themselves be vaccinated ! Let 'em croak! All the same, because of these people's fixed ideas, we can't sterilize all the natives.If the English give India back her liberty, within twenty years India will have lost her liberty again. There are English- men who reproach themselves with having governed the country badly. Why? Because the Indians show no enthusiasm for their rule. I claim that the English have governed India very well, but their error is to expect enthusiasm from the people they administer. If it's true that the English have exploited India, it's also true that India has drawn a profit from English domination. Without the English, India would certainly not have a population of three hundred and eighty million inhabitants.
It is questionable, by the way, whether Cripps will get any hearing from the Indian people. The Indian world has already been so disturbed by the presence of the Japanese on its frontiers, and by the fall of Singapore, that the man of compromise, Nehru, has been eclipsed by Bose. If today Cripps endeavours, with the help of blackmail or begging, to induce the Indians to resist the Japanese, I doubt whether Nehru, however much he would like to, would be able to help him effectively. Nehru's fate will be like that of the Socialists in 1918 who were swept away by the masses.
May 29, 1942: Hitler meets Subhas Chandra Bose
Hitler meets Subhas Chandra Bose, leader of the Indian National Army which fought for Indian independence from colonial rule. Germany forms the Indische legion, made up of Indian volunteers and British-Indian POW's.
4th February 1945
To tell the truth, I feel much more sympathetically inclined to the lowliest Hindu than to any of these arrogant (British) islanders .
7th February 1945
In them, the white races have imposed their will by force, and the influence they have had on the native inhabitants has been negligible; the Hindus have remained Hindus, the Chinese have remained Chinese, and the Muslims are still Muslims. There have been no profound transformations, and such changes as have occurred are less marked in the religious field, notwithstanding the tremendous efforts of the Christian missionaries, than in any other. There have been a few odd conversions the sincerity of which are open to considerable doubt-except, perhaps in the case of a few simpletons and mentally deficient. The white races did, of course, give some things to the natives, and they were the worst gifts that they could possibly have made, those plagues of our own modern world-materialism, fanaticism, alcoholism and syphilis. For the rest, since these peoples possessed qualities of their own which were superior to anything we could offer them, they have remained essentially unchanged. Colonization is not an activity which Germans feel called upon to pursue,Germany should never make common cause with the colonizing nations and should always abstain from supporting them in their colonial aspirations.
Those quotations are from Hitler's transcribed conversations with his personal secretary Martin Bormann, who was with Hitler in his bunker in the Battle of Berlin and one of the witnesses to the signing of Hitler's Last Will and his marriage to Eva Braun on April 29th, 1945. Bormann was also present in the cremation of Adolf and Eva on April 30th.
That uncharacteristically sympathetic view towards non-Europeans held at theend of his life has to be taken in the context of those last few years; it wasn't Asians or Arabs that repelled his European invasions or reduced Dresden to ashes, it was his fellow 'White' people that did it.
As bizarrely sympathetic as Hitler was in the days before his suicide, he began life with a typical Imperialist attitude of the world, and was a hardcore Anglophile in particular. You could say that his goal was to make Germany as powerful as Britain during the height of their empire.
Here's a look at some of the things Hitler said about non-Europeans (India in particular, as this is what the question asks for. Hitler even makes a comment about Nehru and Bose) from the publishing of Mein Kampf to his transcribed private conversations :
July 1941
Let's learn from the English, who, with two hundred and fifty thousand men in all, including fifty thousand soldiers, govern four hundred million Indians.
17th October 1941
The basic reason for English pride is India. Four hundred years ago the English didn't have this pride. The vast spaces over which they spread their rule obliged them to govern millions of people — and they kept these multitudes in order by granting a few men unlimited power. It would obviously have been impossible for them to keep great European areas supplied with foodstuffs and other articles of prime necessity. In any case, the Anglicans never sustained the slightest effort of a missionary description. Thus it was that the Indians never suffered any attack of this sort upon their spiritual integrity.
.
.
.
What India was for England, the territories of Russia will be for us. If only I could make the German people understand what this space means for our future!
.
.
.
If the English were to be driven out of India, India would perish. Our role in Russia will be analogous to that of England in India.
.
.
.
The Russian space is our India. Like the English, we shall rule this empire with a handful of men.
15th August to 17th September 1941
In this business I shall go straight ahead, cold-bloodedly. What they may think about me, at this juncture, is to me a matter of complete indifference. I don't see why a German who eats a piece of bread should torment himself with the idea that the soil that produces this bread has been won by the sword. When we eat wheat from Canada, we don't think about the despoiled Indians. The precept that it's men's duty to love one another is theory — and the Christians are the last to practise it! A negro baby who has the misfortune to die before a missionary gets his clutches on him, goes to Hell! If that were true, one might well lament that sorrowful destiny: to have lived only three years, and to burn for all eternity with Lucifer!
26th October 1941
To exploit the Ukraine properly — that new Indian Empire — I need only peace in the West. The frontier police will be enough to ensure us the quiet conditions necessary for the exploitation of the conquered territories. I attach no importance to a formal, juridical end to the war on the Eastern Front. If the English are clever, they will seize the psychological moment to make an about-turn — and they will march on our side.
5th January 1941
One of their great bases is Iran, Irak and Syria. That's where their fleet takes on supplies. The other is the Malay archipelago, where they're losing all their refueling -points for oil. They can trumpet abroad their intentions concerning Europe, but they (Britain) know very well that it's the possession of India on which the existence of their Empire depends.
December 1941
Hitler meets with Haj Amin al-Husseini, the leader of the Supreme Muslim Council, which was opposed to British presence in Palestine.
January 1942
The wealth of Great Britain is the result less of a perfect commercial organisation than of the capitalist exploitation of the three hundred and fifty million Indian slaves. The British are commended for their worldly wisdom in respecting the customs of the countries subject to them. In reality, this attitude has no other explanation than the determination not to raise the natives' standard of living. If we took India, the Indians would certainly not be enthusiastic, and they'd not be slow to regret the good old days of English rule! The climax of this cynical behavior of the English is that it gives them the prestige of liberalism and tolerance.The prohibition of suttee for widows, and the suppression of starvation-dungeons, were dictated to the English by the desire not to reduce the labour-force, and perhaps also by the desire to economize wood! They set so cleverly about presenting these measures to the world that they provoked a wave of admiration. That's the strength of the English: to allow the natives to live whilst they exploit them to the uttermost.There's not a single Englishman, at this moment, who isn't thinking constantly of India. If one were to offer the English this alternative, to keep India whilst abandoning Europe to Germany, or to lose India whilst retaining the control of Europe, I'm sure that 99 per cent of them would choose to keep India. For them, India has likewise become a symbol, for it's on India that she built the Empire. Out of four hundred and fifty million subjects, the King of England has three hundred and fifty million Indians.
12th-13th January 1942There are no bloody insurrections in India to-day, but the difficulty for the Indians is to reconcile the divergent interests of such a diverse population.How are the princes and the Brahmins, the Hindus and the Mussulmans, all these hierarchised and partitioned castes to be combined in a common front? If a British newspaper in India writes an article to-day attacking Churchill, that's because it can't do anything else — or it would lose its whole public. The Press doesn't give an exact picture of the reality.
In India, revolt is an endemic condition. Gandhi tried to succeed by pacific methods, but whatever be the methods chosen, the Indians are unanimous in their desire to shake off the British yoke. Some of them would like to try Bolshevism for that purpose, others would like to try us. Others would prefer to owe nothing to the foreigner. For all, the object is the same, it's liberty — and nobody cares about the state of anarchy that will follow in India upon the departure of the English.When one treats a people as the English have continually treated the Indians, the unpardonable folly is to send the youth of the country to the universities, where it learns things that it would be better for it not to know.
3rd March 1942
I read to-day that India at present numbers three hundred and eighty-eight million inhabitants, which means an increase of fifty-five millions during the last ten years. It's alarming. We are witnessing the same phenomenon in Russia. The women there have a child every year. The chief reason for this increase is the reduction in mortality due to the progress made by the health services. What are our doctors thinking of? Isn't it enough to vaccinate the whites? So much the worse for the whites who won't let themselves be vaccinated ! Let 'em croak! All the same, because of these people's fixed ideas, we can't sterilize all the natives.If the English give India back her liberty, within twenty years India will have lost her liberty again. There are English- men who reproach themselves with having governed the country badly. Why? Because the Indians show no enthusiasm for their rule. I claim that the English have governed India very well, but their error is to expect enthusiasm from the people they administer. If it's true that the English have exploited India, it's also true that India has drawn a profit from English domination. Without the English, India would certainly not have a population of three hundred and eighty million inhabitants.
It is questionable, by the way, whether Cripps will get any hearing from the Indian people. The Indian world has already been so disturbed by the presence of the Japanese on its frontiers, and by the fall of Singapore, that the man of compromise, Nehru, has been eclipsed by Bose. If today Cripps endeavours, with the help of blackmail or begging, to induce the Indians to resist the Japanese, I doubt whether Nehru, however much he would like to, would be able to help him effectively. Nehru's fate will be like that of the Socialists in 1918 who were swept away by the masses.
May 29, 1942: Hitler meets Subhas Chandra Bose
Hitler meets Subhas Chandra Bose, leader of the Indian National Army which fought for Indian independence from colonial rule. Germany forms the Indische legion, made up of Indian volunteers and British-Indian POW's.
Last edited:
