What's new

History will hold judges responsible if anything happens to Musharraf: Kasuri

FalconsForPeace

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2013
Messages
1,132
Reaction score
3
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Advocate Ahmed Raza Kasuri told the special court that former president Pervez Musharraf could not make it to court as his life was still under threat, Express News reported on Tuesday.
During the hearing of the treason case against Musharraf, Kasuri stated that the interior ministry had said that there was a threat to Musharraf’s life.

The interior ministry, which happens to be his prosecutor, had warned that there is a serious threat to his life from the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and al Qaeda.

Kasuri further stated that if something happens to the retired general, history would hold the three judges of the special court – Justice Faisal Arab, Justice Syeda Tahira Safdar and Justice Yawar Ali - responsible.

Prosecutor Akram Sheikh told the court that security was increased as 2,200 officers – compared to earlier 1,100 – were deployed to ensure Musharraf’s safety.

Kasuri said proper screening of security officers was necessary to ensure safety.

Rana Ijaz Ahmed Khan, a member of Musharraf’s legal team was escorted out of the courtroom for exchanging harsh words with the judges.

Escorted out

Khan claimed that the judges were “killers for hire” to which the court responded that he committed contempt of court and a notice would be issued to him in this regard.

Speaking to the media, Musharraf’s counsel Barrister Saif said that the judges asked security to escort Khan out of the court, claiming that this action by the judges was proof that they were biased against Musharraf.

Musharraf was ordered to appear before the court on March 14.

Background

The former president faces treason charges under Article 6 for suspending, subverting and abrogating the Constitution, imposing an emergency in the country in November 2007 and detaining judges of the superior courts.

The 70-year-old had fallen ill and taken to the Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology in Rawalpindi over three months ago where he is still under treatment.

History will hold judges responsible if anything happens to Musharraf: Kasuri – The Express Tribune
 
.
Article:6 (2A). An act of high treason mentioned in clause (1) or clause (2) shall not be validated by any court including the Supreme court and a high court .
They both article 6:1 and 6:2 should be implemented in this case.
Advocate Khan said in the court that I had a call last night of Lyari gang members. They said they have accepted the contract of killing Musharraf from justice Faqroo uddin.
 
Last edited:
.
Article:6 (2A). An act of high treason mentioned in clause (1) or clause (2) shall not be validated by any court including the Supreme court and a high court .
They both article 6:1 and 6:2 should be implemented in this case.
Advocate Khan said in the court that I had a call last night of Lyari gang members. They said they have accepted the contract of killing Musharraf from justice Faqroo uddin.
To warn any would be dictator and his would be accomplices, who ultimately, will bring all that destruction,deaths,shame and insults from all over the world,this macho Mush, this MUJRAH/WHISKEY lover,this phoney "Sayyed"who sneaked into the top mil post,should be tried and then hanged. Gen Raheel Shareef ,i am sure will pass the message.
 
.
To warn any would be dictator and his would be accomplices, who ultimately, will bring all that destruction,deaths,shame and insults from all over the world,this macho Mush, this MUJRAH/WHISKEY lover,this phoney "Sayyed"who sneaked into the top mil post,should be tried and then hanged. Gen Raheel Shareef ,i am sure will pass the message.
i dont think, you got any mujrah proves of him, with any of your known ones, or relatives, because if you got 1, you must hve gone to the courts?
& he was a carrered soilder, in PAKARMY no body can hell sneak into the top position, that really shows your TORABORA knowledge about pakarmy?
death , destruction, shame was brought by those khawarjis , who went to do 9/11 , all of the muslim world been attacked as a result, but again it was same syed mushraf shb, who did a great job, to let pakistan still independent, never occupied like libya or iraq?
the biggest mistake, of him was to let, a dog alive yes OSAAMA BIN LADEN.
COAS is not traitor, or a conspirator to think like your nonsense mind.
 
. .
The actions against Musharraf are the personal vendetta of NS and Judiciary, nothing else.
Musharraf had the chance to finish off NS, but he failed, so now he has to face the consequences.
mark my words, in the end it would be pakistan be facing all that!
 
.
History will also remember the most cowardly Commando General

The actions against Musharraf are the personal vendetta of NS and Judiciary, nothing else.
Musharraf had the chance to finish off NS, but he failed, so now he has to face the consequences.

maybe history is correcting itself and finishing off the right person
too much to digest by the nation who has been a slave of political parties, their ethnicities, their sects and more than anything their establishment
 
Last edited:
.
History will also remember the most cowardly Commando General



maybe history is correcting itself and finishing off the right person
too much to digest by the nation who has been a slave of political parties, their ethnicities, their sects and more than anything their establishment
maybe, you forgot how a, coward & croupt pakistani PM went to USA crying hard to clionton, while an anoyed president cliton because of his wasted quality time of monica ,went crazy after PAKARMY & its brave genrl who went inside enemy land to take back the rightfull land of kashmir from its coward enemies?
ohh you still cant remember, how the lists of kashmiri freedom fighters been passed to, indian PM by NAWAZ SHARIF?
ohhh, you still not remember it was same NAWAZ SHARIF , who went to attack SC?
ohhj, you still not remember it was karz uttaroo mulk sanwaroow, after which london mansions been buyed?
ohh, you still not remember its was , NAWAZ SHARIF who use to call , gentl ZIA his dady?
ohh, you still not remember, what was the sentence given to nawaz by SC, for plan hijacking case?
ohhh, ohhh, ohhh, ohhhh , ohhh but never remember, that it was a crooked CJ, & his mote carlo family, who dumped by president musharf because of thier crouption?
if still, you dont remember anythimg, just remember that this time, there will be no prince to take the croupt nawaz back?
 
.
There is no point of bringing Nawaz Sharif into this, as this is clearly about Musharraf facing charges of allegedly involved in several areas. The cases like Lal Badshah, Aafia, drone [permitting on agreement] and many more; are still pending.
 
.
There is no point of bringing Nawaz Sharif into this, as this is clearly about Musharraf facing charges of allegedly involved in several areas. The cases like Lal Badshah, Aafia, drone [permitting on agreement] and many more; are still pending.
i guss, if NAWAZ wsnt kicked out, in 99 there wouldnt be any of the emergncies declared on 2007?
so why he was kicked out in 99?
why not start from 99?
no case bieng procecuted, aginst musharaf on the mentioned grounds by you, if he has allowed drones, then why cant elected stupids like ZARDARI or even NAWAZ has cancelled that stupid agreement, & should hve stopped drones instead, i guss you dont hve any dam idea about what are you talking? right?
& if they cant do that, they should be punished like musharaf? no?
Aafia went out from her home in karachi , without asking any permission from her family & her husband, in the long ladting love of an arab mujahid to afghanistan, that histerical stupid, overeducated sexually distrubed lady brought how much shame to pakistan, you still are telling us, its musharaf,s fault?
thatnshe went hinky to that arab man , even still in the nikha of her husband, that what islam preaches, what about your own wife doing same thing, what would be you doing, ohh puting a dam FIR, on president of pakistan? right? wow?
 
.
Kasuri further stated that if something happens to the retired general, history would hold the three judges of the special court – Justice Faisal Arab, Justice Syeda Tahira Safdar and Justice Yawar Ali - responsible.

History will also hold the judges responsible if they do not give a treasonous dictator the punishment he deserves.
 
.
It is not about Nawaz Sharif anymore. All of them happened under the leadership of Musharraf including Lal Badshah, Aafia that were against the laws despite of illogical excuses you have laid out. Musharraf is accountable for what happened during his leadership. I am not supporter of Nawaz Sharif, but given the precedent of history, no active PM have been brought to trials on court, except in this case former PM of Pakistan is being brought to court. I guess Musharraf shouldn't have resigned or shouldn't have come back to Pakistan, since he he is here; like other, he will be brought to court for legit reasons. No silly excuses is going to cut it this time.
 
.
What is worse for Mushi is that he has Kusuri along with him. He keeps making things worse for Mushi.
Truly said, "A wise enemy is better than a foolish friend".
 
.
It is not about Nawaz Sharif anymore. All of them happened under the leadership of Musharraf including Lal Badshah, Aafia that were against the laws despite of illogical excuses you have laid out. Musharraf is accountable for what happened during his leadership. I am not supporter of Nawaz Sharif, but given the precedent of history, no active PM have been brought to trials on court, except in this case former PM of Pakistan is being brought to court. I guess Musharraf shouldn't have resigned or shouldn't have come back to Pakistan, since he he is here; like other, he will be brought to court for legit reasons. No silly excuses is going to cut it this time.
so if afaia went to afghanistan with her will was mushatafs fault?


Dr Aafia Siddiqui’s husband breaks his silence after six years - thenews.com.pk

Dr Aafia Siddiqui’s husband breaks his silence after six years
Aroosa MasroorWednesday, February 18, 2009
From Print Edition


2467 1641 603 26


KARACHI: After six years of silence, Dr Muhammad Amjad Khan, ex-husband of Dr Aafia Siddiqui, has finally spoken up and says that most of the press reports that relate to his former wife as well as his children are false. In an exclusive talk with The News, he said that most claims are being propagated to garner public support and sympathy for Dr Aafia but are one-sided and in most instances untrue.



Dr Aafia Siddiqui, suspected of having links to terrorist organizations, has been charged in a criminal complaint filed in a court of New York on account of attempting to kill US personnel during interrogation and on a charge of assaulting US officers and employees in Kabul, Afghanistan, on July 17, 2008. Subsequently Dr Aafia was imprisoned in Bagram for 18 days before being taken to the US for a trial.



Due to pressure from Aafia Siddiqui’s family, the Pakistan government has been trying to secure her release from the US claiming her to be innocent. Although the US government has guaranteed Aafia the best legal assistance and a fair trial, her family is adamant that she be sent back on grounds that the US authorities have been consistently torturing her for years.



“Aafia’s release cannot be secured by propagating stories based on falsehood and deception,” commented Dr Amjad Khan, in an interview with The News. Dr Amjad, who was married to Dr Aafia for seven years until their divorce in October 2002, said Aafia’s family and supporters should not believe that truth will not be revealed and mere lies will help in securing Aafia’s repatriation.



He added that he is disappointed with the government’s disregard for the law when officials handed over his eldest son, Ahmad, to his aunt Dr Fowzia Siddiqui on his return from Afghanistan last year instead of his legal guardian, his father. “The government made no effort to locate me despite the fact that I am Ahmad’s real and legal guardian. My address in Karachi has not changed for the past 30 years. Ever since I returned from the US after our divorce, I have been living with my family,” he said adding: “Both the Minister for Interior Rehman Malik and Dr Fowzia have been taking credit for obtaining Ahmad’s release even though there was not a stone I left unturned to locate my missing children and obtain their custody according to law.”



Providing documentary proof of the legal agreement between him and Dr Aafia following their divorce, Dr Amjad said that he had been financially supporting his three children Ahmed, Marium and Suleiman until the family stopped accepting the cheques he had been mailing. “After the agreement they accepted my cheques till March 2003. After that my cheques were being returned from Aafia’s home and that got me worried. Soon after I learnt that in April 2003, Aafia and our children had been ‘picked up’ by agencies.” Meanwhile, he received disturbing reports from the family that Aafia chose to leave Karachi with her children as she feared an attack from him.



Curious to locate the whereabouts of his children, Dr Amjad sought the help of the police and government officials to find them. “I was aware of Aafia’s violent personality and extremist views and suspected her involvement in Jihadi activities. My fear later proved to be true when during Uzair Paracha’s trial in the US in 2004, the real purpose of Aafia’s trip to the US (between December 23, 2002 and January 3, 2003) was revealed.”



Elaborating, Dr Amjad disclosed that he later learnt from media reports that Aafia’s family claimed she made this trip to the US for job interviews in December at a time when universities were closed for winter holidays. “I also found it very odd that on the one hand Aafia insisted on leaving the US after September 11, 2001, claiming the country was unsafe for us and our children because the US government was abducting Muslim children, and on the other hand took the risk of travelling to that country again without fearing that she may be captured and may never see our children again.”



While Dr Aafia was in the US, the authorities had been closely watching her, added Amjad. They soon issued the first global “wanted for questioning” alert for the couple in March 2003. “At that time, the agencies did not know we were divorced and I was also unaware of Aafia’s involvement with two other terror suspects, Majid Khan and Ammar Al-Baluchi. They wanted me to persuade Aafia to appear for the interview with them and clear the charges leveled against her just as I had done. That is when she went underground and it later became apparent why she chose to ‘disappear’,” disclosed Dr Amjad.



Sharing details of his unsuccessful marriage with Dr Aafia, Dr Amjad told The News that since their marriage was arranged, he was unaware of Aafia’s violent behaviour. “She got hysterical fits when she became angry and would physically attack me, but I put up with it for the sake of our children.”



Although Amjad and Aafia both were inclined towards religion, he found her opinion towards Jihad to be of an extreme nature that sometimes made him uncomfortable. He became particularly suspicious of his wife’s intentions when soon after the 9/11 attacks, she compelled Amjad to leave Boston (where Amjad was completing his residency) and move to Afghanistan where she claimed “he would be more useful”.



The couple, however, chose to come to Pakistan instead for a vacation and discuss the matter with Amjad’s family. It was here that his parents noticed Aafia’s violent behaviour towards their son on several occasions, particularly when she openly asked for khula (divorce) when Amjad declined to go to Afghanistan. Therefore Amjad decided to file for a divorce as Aafia was adamant she wanted to go. “I tried my best to save our marriage, but divorce was inevitable,” he recalls.



However, after mutual consent, the couple signed a legal agreement whereby the custody of the three minors was given to Aafia, while Amjad was required to pay for their education and maintenance. “Although the agreement says I am permitted to meet my children once a week, I was not allowed to do so,” claimed Amjad sharing a copy of the agreement during the interview.



Based on his past experience, Amjad says he had reason to worry about his children. “I feared Aafia might pursue her political ambitions to the detriment of our children’s welfare so I couldn’t help following her case after her family claimed she had been abducted.” Amjad added that he was tempted to use other means to try and rescue his children in these past five years especially since he had evidence that were missing or kidnapped, he claimed. “But I chose to be patient and pursued the case according to the law.” He also filed a case in court against Aafia to obtain the custody of his children.



“When the Court was unsuccessful, I requested the HRCP to include my children’s names in their missing persons petition in the Supreme Court and also appealed to the Chief Justice for Suo Moto action as this was the only case where three minors were involved.”



However, after Ahmad was released and handed over to Dr Fowzia last year, Dr Amjad requested her to allow him to visit his son, but she refused. “At first she said Ahmed was mentally unfit to talk, and then claimed that he was not my son but an orphan adopted by Aafia and US reports that his DNA matched Aafia’s were also ‘cooked’. I refused to accept any of that as I had identified my son as soon as I saw a report on the electronic media of his arrest in Afghanistan.”



When questioned on what basis was Aafia’s family†denying a meeting with his son, Amjad stated that the family is punishing him for divorcing Aafia. “Aafia’s mother and Dr Fowzia had warned me at the time of our divorce that they would take revenge†by not letting me meet the children,” he said adding “But now they are discouraging a meeting with Ahmad because they fear Ahmad will reveal the truth about Aafia’s activities and whereabouts of his siblings over these years.”



He added that Dr Fowzia had similarly threatened him several years ago by taking a picture of Aafia while she was asleep after she injured her upper lip (by a milk bottle)†in an accident. Dr Fowzia warned Amjad that if he tried to divorce Aafia, she would use the picture against him alleging him to be an abusive husband. “It was made to appear in the picture that Aafia was badly injured. Today, the same picture is being circulated in the media to claim that Aafia was tortured for years in Bagram,” he revealed.†



Furthermore, Amjad listed the several allegations leveled against him over the years to justify his not meeting his children: First they accused him of kidnapping his three children soon after his divorce with Aafia. To deny this accusation, he lodged a complaint against the family with the Sindh Police and requested officials to help him locate his children, but to no avail.



Later, Aafia’s family accused him of being an abusive husband and father preventing the children from meeting their father. “Aafia’s mother has also accused me in the media of changing the children’s names whereas in reality they had resorted to these tactics to conceal the children.”



He alleged that Dr Fowzia also used the Asian Human Rights Commission, an NGO based in Honk Kong, to mislead the government about his two missing children. “The AHRC received the information about my two missing children being in an orphanage in Afghanistan from Dr Fowzia, who was diverting attention away from the place where the children really are.” claimed Amjad.



Earlier, when Aafia’s father died, the family held Amjad responsible for his death too claiming he suffered a stroke after he saw the divorce document. “That is simply not true because I mailed the document two days after Aafia’s father died and that too because I was unaware of the unfortunate incident. Their family never kept me posted on anything in the six-week period between our verbal and written divorce. I was just as shocked at his death.”



Moreover, the family alleged that Aafia was in trouble and had been kidnapped because her former husband (Dr Amjad) handed over her personal diary to the FBI. “After this, false reports about Aafia’s arrest and Pakistani government’s involvement in handing her over to the US despite repeated denials by the Minister of Interior and other officials, started making headlines” claims the doctor, who has now re-married.



It is the whereabouts of his two children ñ Marium now aged 10, and six-year-old Suleiman ñ that worries him now, said Amjad. Like the coordinates of Dr Aafia Siddiqui remained a mystery after she was allegedly ‘picked up’ in March 2003, Dr Amjad believes Aafia’s family may be using the same tactics in the case of his two children, who are reportedly ‘missing’.



“I am sure they are around Karachi and in contact with their maternal family as both Aafia and the children were seen around their house here and in Islamabad on multiple occasions since their alleged disappearance in 2003. They may be living under an assumed identity just like Aafia and Ahmed had been living [as Saliha and Ali Ahsan] for five years before they got arrested,” believes the father. He said Dr Fowzia’s claim that the children are missing after being removed from the Bagram prison in Afghanistan ‘may be an attempt to attract sympathy of the government and the people and distract its attention from the real location.’



POSTS TAGGED ‘AAFIA SIDDIQUI’S TERRORIST HUSBAND AMMAR AL-BALUCHI’
‘Lady Al Qaeda’ Aafia Siddiqui Guility of Attempted Murder Siddiqui Will Get 60 Years in Prison, Aafia Siddiqui used the name Feriel Shahin.

Posted: February 3, 2010 in crime and terrorism
Tags: 'Lady Al Qaeda' Aafia Siddiqui Guility of Attempted Murder Siddiqui Will Get 60 Years in Prison, 2002, 2003, A federal jury in Manhattan found Aafia Siddiqui guilty of grabbing a soldier's rifle and opening fire on an American team sent to question her in Afghanistan. The 37-year-old MIT-trained neuroscienti, a Muslim, AAFIA SIDDIQUI "HOBBIT' LOOK ALIKE GETS 60 YEARS ROT IN HELL TERRORIST BASTARD, AAFIA SIDDIQUI "HOBBIT' LOOK ALIKE WILL GET 60 YEARS ROT IN HELL YOU TERRORIST BASTARD, AAFIA SIDDIQUI HAD PLANS FOR "MASS CASUALTY ATTACK" WITH DIRTY BOMBS IN NEW YORK CITY, AAFIA SIDDIQUI'S TERRORIST HUSBAND AMMAR AL-BALUCHI, and departed on January 2, and the Brooklyn Bridge., Bruce said the woman (Aafia Siddiqui), FERIEL SHAHIN IS AAFIA SIDDIQUI, HIS UNCLE KSM AND HER BALTIMORE PAL MAJID KAHN WHO LINKS TO NYC UZAIR PARACHA, I doubt that Aafia Aafia Siddiqui, if asked, including Plum Island, involved in the purchasing of diamonds in Sierra Leone it appears that Aafia Siddiqui used the name Feriel Shahin, mass casualty attack" and that listed various locations in the United States, Siddiqui returned to the United States on December 25, Special Court for Sierra Leone had identified Aafia Siddiqui from her June 15h 2001 visa to Liberia as Feriel Shahin, the Empire State Building, the Statue of Liberty, Wall Street, would "help carry out a deadly Anthrax attack against the United States
Wednesday, February 03, 2010
AAFIA SIDDIQUI “HOBBIT’ LOOK ALIKE WILL GET 60 YEARS ROT IN HELL YOU TERRORIST BASTARD………………….
‘Lady Al Qaeda’ Aafia Siddiqui convicted of attempted murder Wednesday, February 3rd 2010, 2:47 PM
The woman dubbed
“Lady Al Qaeda” was convicted of attempted murder Wednesday. A federal jury in Manhattan found Aafia Siddiqui guilty of grabbing a soldier’s rifle and opening fire on an American team sent to question her in Afghanistan. The 37-year-old MIT-trained neuroscientist faces up to 60 years in prison for attempted murder and armed assault, MORE FROM THIS SOURCE…….
FERIEL SHAHIN IS AAFIA SIDDIQUI;


FERIEL SHAHIN IS AAFIA SIDDIQUI;
Special Court for Sierra Leone: Office of the Prosecutor: Profile (Added 7/29/08) Siddiqui was allegedly involved in the purchasing of diamonds in Sierra Leone it appears that Aafia Siddiqui used the name Feriel Shahin. Both David Crane, the prosecutor and Alan White, the chief investigator of the Special Court for Sierra Leone had identified Aafia Siddiqui from her June 15h 2001 visa to Liberia as Feriel Shahin (see above ) who picked up a package containing diamonds worth $19 million, Pakistani intelligence traced her and two al Qaeda colleagues to the Shaharah-e-Faaisal Hotel in Karachi before disappearing in July of 2001.

Aafia Siddiqui also possessed a computer thumb drive that contained correspondence referring to specific “cells,” “attacks” by certain “cells,” and “enemies.” Other documents on the thumb drive discussed recruitment and training, SEE VIDEO CLICK HERE.
Aafia Siddiqui, a 36-year-old Pakistani woman, resided in the United States from in or about 1991 until June 2002, and obtained degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Brandeis University. Siddiqui returned to the United States on December 25, 2002, and departed on January 2, 2003, I doubt that Aafia Aafia Siddiqui, a Muslim, was back in the USA to celebrate Christmas with the Christians. See Federal Indictment Click Here.
See Prior Post Thursday, August 12,2008: Aafia siddiqui’e extended Al-Qaeda Terrroist family,AAFIA SIDDIQUI’S TERRORIST HUSBAND AMMAR AL-BALUCHI, HIS UNCLE KHALID SHAIKH MOHAMMED (KSM) AND HER BALTIMORE PAL MAJID KAHN WHO LINKS TO NYC UZAIR PARACHA
Terrorist Majid Khan appears to have met with Aafia Saddiqui who is a MIT grad in microbiology, she had access to Anthrax while working at Brandeis Univ in Boston. Assistant United States Attorney Eric Bruce claimed that MIT graduate Aafia Siddiqui was willing to help with an anthrax attack. Eric Bruce repeatedly referred to a planned chemical attack by Majid Khan but never described the plot or when and where it would occur. He said a woman affiliated with al-Qaida opened a Maryland post office box in the names of herself and Majid Khan so immigration documents could be sent there.
Bruce said the woman (Aafia Siddiqui), if asked, would “help carry out a deadly Anthrax attack against the United States.” Her whereabouts were unknown at that time. But it was the only mention of Anthrax in his opening statements and the prosecutor never said whether Anthrax was part of Majid Khan’s plot. Aafia Siddiqui rented P.O. Box #187XX Baltimore MD 21206 for Majid Khan while he was in Pakistan meeting with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

Al Qaeda facilitator Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali , otherwise known as Ammar al-Baluchi, states that he ordered Aafia Siddiqui to help get travel documents for Majid Khan who intended to blow up gas stations and bridges and poison reservoirs in the United States. His (Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali) biography also states that he married Siddiqui shortly before his capture which sheds light on Aafia Siddiqui’s relationship to top Al Qaeda planners like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who is Ammar al-Baluchi’s uncle.

Bill Warner Director of CSPI..Covert Surveillance by Private Investigators at WBI Inc.See one of my prior posts on this terrorist hag; Wednesday, September 03, 2008, AAFIA SIDDIQUI HAD PLANS FOR “MASS CASUALTY ATTACK” WITH DIRTY BOMBS IN NEW YORK CITY.

Aafia Siddiqui Indicted for Attempting to Kill United States Nationals in Afghanistan and Six Additional Charges. ..On July 17, 2008, when Aafia Siddiqui was detained by Afghan authorities, a number of items were in her possession, including handwritten notes that referred to a “mass casualty attack” and that listed various locations in the United States, including Plum Island, the Empire State Building, the Statue of Liberty, Wall Street, and the Brooklyn Bridge. Other notes in Siddiqui’s possession referred to the construction of “dirty bombs,” and discussed various ways to attack “enemies,” including by destroying reconnaissance drones, using underwater bombs, and using gliders.


AAFIA SIDDIQUI’S TERRORIST HUSBAND AMMAR AL-BALUCHI | P.I. BILL WARNER SARASOTA PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR CALL 941-926-1926











that was your terrorists sister, for whom you were crying?


who was lal badsha?
i mean no body heard about him, wasnt was he the donkey yard owner ?
bring facts, dont be a stupid torabora mullha, trying to destroy the world, to get peace of yourself?
all of your gillberish against musharaf is no value?
bring facts?ok
wasnt was supreme court of pakistan was attacked by NAWAZ SHARIF, what sentence or punishments he has recived till yet? nothing?
if, declaring emergyncy was wrong ?
so was aidding it too, in whole of 80,s nawaz was calling genrl zi a his daddy?
in 99 CJ chodry iftikhar said musharaf did the right thing, how come it all went wrong in 2007?
 
.
There is no point of bringing Nawaz Sharif into this, as this is clearly about Musharraf facing charges of allegedly involved in several areas. The cases like Lal Badshah, Aafia, drone [permitting on agreement] and many more; are still pending.

NS, he is the coward he is the person who was delaying the test of atomic weapons. Musharraf made a mistake and that was he let him free off. He should kill him when he was conspiring against him.
Musharraf saved The Ka'ab when it was in under terrorist's control, he was commander that time.
Now are you trying to say that Musharraf was a coward.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom