God is an Observer and doesn't want to disrupt cycle of Karma, your karma does all the things, and karma of Pakistan has made them what they are today, and our karma is doing us all the good, god almighty loves good people, and you are not good people...
No even god likes to differentiate between good and bad, as he would be indirectly blaming himself for creation of bad people so he made Karma, Karma does this with lot of cuteness and people often remain awestruck, like you will be after few hours...and again we also call our dead veergati ko prapt hona...
Is it reserved for muslims??? show me the page where its written that the word belong to Muslims only, we have many words, people like the word shaheed, waise bhi marne ke baad who knows what happens...
They wont understand so here is the English translation: I bear witness that there is no God but Allah, the One, and without any partners, and I bear witness that Muhammad (peace be upon him) is His Servant and Messenger.
ideology here meant the ideology expressed in the shahadah (kalima), no need for you to take exception
> now make a movie
Your argument is flawed. Its not just the word of a commodity like chair or table that you are borrowing, the word shaheed has an Islamic/Religious meaning. Its not pure Arab literature but a Religious concept mentioned in Quran specifically, so the word belongs to the Religion of Islam and not arabic literature: Its used for those who gave their life for a just cause in Islam, which can be used for Muslims only. Indian Muslims can use it for their deaths per Islamic rules of shaheed, such as those muslims burnt alive during the Gujrat riots for being a Muslim etc., those Indians are Shaheeds as well. But Hindus or anyother nonmuslims using it is sort of a profilitration for lack of better word here. Another example is Namaz (muslims prayer) - its an urdu word, Indian Muslims speaking hindi can borrow/use it for their Namaz, but if Hindus start using it for their Pooja or any other Hindu religious activities, then thats not right.
It is also ironic how all these "Indus Nationalists" love to claim the Buddhist Gandharan civilization, despite the fact that Buddhism was created in Ganga India and the foundations for the Gandharan civilization were created when the Mauryan empire under Ashoka invaded Pakistan and built up Purushapura, now called Peshawar. But I do not blame them from leaching of the civilization of the superior Ganges region, considering that Ganges civilization=South Asian civilization. Virtually everything good that came out of South Asia came out of the Gangetic plains, and the Gangetic Plains were the center of South Asian civilization as we know it. In comparison, modern-day Pakistan was simply a sparsely-populated backwards fringe region that contributed little to South Asian civilization or human civilization as a whole. Pakistan could have been replaced by a giant hole for the past 10,000 years and human history would not be any different.
