What's new

Hindu Terrorism hits Arabs hard | Humilates Arab Women & Girls | Muslims Targeted

in few years you will see hindu-arabi. combine the two you get the worse lot.

I once met one Indian-Yemen hybrid in undergrad and I have not seen a single creature worse. He was talking about how Yemen needs to split into different countries. When he found out I was Pakistani, he totally pretended I didn't exist. So scared was he that I would be on to him. Difficult because we were in the same masjid and MSA. He pretended he was fully Yemeni, while talking garbage against Arabs in general.

I also met an Iranian who passed himself as an Al Balushi in undergrad and he was rabidly anti-Pakistani, when I questioned him about tribal origin, he could not even tell me a single thing.

I hate fakers.
 
.
I’m not that optimistic .. end of the day it is only Pakistan who would be standing up to hegemony of India.. no one else ever came to succour Pakistan .. not in future anyone will come .. it is Pakistan who is standing up for Indian Muslims .. and Kashmir!!! no one else!
 
.
I once met one Indian-Yemen hybrid in undergrad and I have not seen a single creature worse. He was talking about how Yemen needs to split into different countries. When he found out I was Pakistani, he totally pretended I didn't exist. So scared was he that I would be on to him. Difficult because we were in the same masjid and MSA. He pretended he was fully Yemeni, while talking garbage against Arabs in general.

I also met an Iranian who passed himself as an Al Balushi in undergrad and he was rabidly anti-Pakistani, when I questioned him about tribal origin, he could not even tell me a single thing.

I hate fakers.

LOL, Indian's should not be able to breed with other races as it just degrades things.

Iranian's are a confused bunch as you've seen in the U.S., so Pro-West and openly support the bombing of their own country men, I've not seen a more confused society than Iranians.
 
.
@waz @Horus @WebMaster @WAJsal @Irfan Baloch


Please deal with the above anti-Pakistani trolling.

Look I am not happy about writing such stuff either - you do see it is in response to what the other guy wrote about India. I said exactly what he said. @waz @Horus @WebMaster @WAJsal @Irfan Baloch

@Thamizh Puli Is still here after calling for the breakup of Pakistan by sect and ethnicity, but @PAKISTANFOREVER is banned....

What is happening?

I do NOT wish or call for breakup of any country and actuall
@Thamizh Puli Is still here after calling for the breakup of Pakistan by sect and ethnicity, but @PAKISTANFOREVER is banned....

What is happening?

I do NOT wish for any country including Pakistan to break up. In fact I wish the best for Pakistan and hope Pakistanis and Indians and all in the region can live in peace; and develop to be stars in the Asian century.

Seriously.

You should however realize that if somebody speaks ill of India I will respond. That is what happened. I am not happy about that at all. Criticism is one thing, disrespect is another.

Sorry if that hurt your feelings, not my intention

@waz @Horus @WebMaster @WAJsal @Irfan Baloch
 
. .
@Mangus Ortus Novem @SIPRA
Respected elder brothers, I submit for your kind perusal the above act of textbook chanakiya.

Indeed, this is a variant of chanakiya that is produced solely for export, in this case the export target is the UAE diaspora. In the past though, the British "south Asian" community was the first recipient of such generous aid from mainland Hindustan! If I may remind our dear pdf colleagues of some diaspora history, there was a similar time of societal and economic upheaval in post-WW2 Britain, when the textile mills of the north required hard labour in the readily available form of south Asian migrants. At the time, Pakistanis conveniently put to one side the brutal lessons of partition and the Quaid and opted for pragmatic rapprochement with the Indian diaspora. The reasons for this echo those quoted by our friend here - that whitey (replace presently with Arabs) will supposedly treat us all like doormats. Unsurprisingly, chanakiya threw Pakistanis under the nearest double decker bus as soon as whitey adjusted his own global geopolitical calculus just marginally enough to accommodate the Indian and at this juncture, the Indian had no further need for a "unified victimhood" approach with the gullible Pakistani, hence the true islamophobic, "terrorist" labelling and Pakistan-bashing vitriol emerged wholesale. Even whitey is taken aback and jarred somewhat by the hatred of the saffron brigades towards those in green and white - "wow, is there some ptsd type history here that you were suppressing back in the 50's??" he might well ask.

...Which brings us to where we are now.... Indians trying to insert the same seeds of doubt in the minds of gullible labourers in the Arab world this time round - maybe we should listen to these brotherly Indians, after all, they're the same blood and colour and culture as us right? Surely they've got our backs covered, unlike these Arabs right?

Dear friends in the Pakistani diaspora literally anywhere in the world - heed the lessons learned in the last 70 years. Do not repeat the mistakes made by Indian Muslims, Kashmiri Muslims and our parents' generation of British diaspora Pakistanis - that somehow, the words and concerns and pledges of Indians may be taken at face value. You're quite simply not one of them. They don't have your interests at heart. They will wait until they are collectively strong enough and then they will strike you down with a stunning betrayal.

And to my dear Indian associates on pdf, don't be offended or get your knickers in a twist over these harsh truths. Your historical expertise in chanakiya should actually be a matter of pride for you all. I firmly believe though that it is a trick that is waning in its effectiveness. The younger generation of Pakistanis is not blissfully ignorant in the same way as our parents were. We can spot many - though not all - of these deceptions from a mile away.

So in summation, no Pakistani in the GCC should under any circumstances fall for the "Arabs will still treat you bad so stick with us" mantra emanating from the mouths of these vile people. It is a simple deceit. You're better off taking a gamble with Arabs, whites, Chinese, Turks, Iranians or even swamp creatures than trusting the words of Indians.

far from 'harsh truths' what you have based this is on is merely your wishful version of truth. It is wrong because it is not true and it is wishful because you invented it to justify things that went wrong for you. elaborating a bit, key points of your departure from truth :

1) no Chanakya threw Pakistanis under any bus; Pakistanis developed a mindset based on your founding & subsequent leaders' quest for Indian land.

2) The branding as terrorists was also self-inflicted. What did Chanakyas and India to do with OBL in Abbottabad? What did they have to do with proliferating to Libya, Iran and N.Korea?

After setting the whole populace into the Kashmir or else mode, generations of Pakistani military have been unable to explain their failures or justify their expensive keep, so the vicious cycle continues - of poisoning the next generation with the same crap

Biggest lie I have seen on this forum. It did not work in Gulf, and it won't work here.

Your sole purpose here is to attack Pakistan and Pakistanis. That is also the mission of your beloved Modi.

that's not a lie but if that's the biggest you say you've come across, you must be viewing a different forum than me. I do not always choose my words carefully so may be you don't understand what a well wisher I am

This is Hindutva Terrorism showing its ugly face wherever these infected rats are.

Hindutva and terrorism are complete opposites. Hindus Sanathans - that work and pray for wellness and peace for all. BTW a huge proportion of Indians living & working in the Gulf including UAE are Muslim.
 
.
no Chanakya threw Pakistanis under any bus; Pakistanis developed a mindset based on your founding & subsequent leaders' quest for Indian land.

2) The branding as terrorists was also self-inflicted. What did Chanakyas and India to do with OBL in Abbottabad? What did they have to do with proliferating to Libya, Iran and N.Korea?
1) I was referring specifically to diaspora experiences. Our parents' generation relied on one another to present combined strength against institutionalised discrimination on the basis of colour and "Asian-ness". There was no "anti-Islam" movement back then. You were a "P@ki" just like me. Hence our parents worked together to overcome this obstacle. However now, the fruits of our joint efforts are indeed Pakistanis being thrown under a bus by their former allies. Starting in the last decade, the majority of Indians now actively work to malign the children of their parents' allies. Populist anti-Islam groups have Indian guest representatives who gleefully lecture skinheads on the supposed dangers of Pakistanis and Muslims in Europe. British Indian cricket fans will wear Indian shirts and fire racist vitriol at Moeen Ali who plays for England simply to fulfil an Indian agenda against Pakistan - it's so pathetic and bizarre that Moeen's white english teammates are unsure how to even respond to these confused British born Indians criticising a British born England player over his heritage. It's despicably mutated casual dinner table racism against Pakistanis and bigotry against Muslims that has emerged from some previously suppressed saffronist inferiority complex - it appears that it was only suppressed for a limited time while Indians needed numerical support from Pakistanis. This is the chanakya I refer to. Diaspora Indians apparently always had Delhi and hindutva at heart, ahead of London or NY or Toronto. Look at how they shamelessly toe the BJP agenda without questioning the bigotry even once at the "howdy Modi" type events regardless of their supposed levels of education and status.

2) No point dragging global geopolitics into this. OBL was once an American asset and a freedom fighter. Libya, NK and Iran simply chose to fight against the USA at determinant phases of their history, hence their designations as pariah states, which is probably what you allude to in a disjointed manner. The folks India supports in Afghanistan, Balochistan and elsewhere are as brutal as anyone labelled "terrorists" by USA. I regard the Indian security forces to be bigger terrorists than anyone listed so far in our conversation. So it's all swings and roundabouts really in terms of who actually is a terrorist and who actually is a freedom fighter. My original point was regarding my own observation that Indian diaspora communities have flipped completely in their association with Pakistani ones. It's actually good for us that we have now reaped this bitter harvest - naivete is a serious weakness and inhibitor of progress.
 
. .
^

I live in the US and with rare exceptions, there is no difference whether your neighbor is Indian or Pakistani. I know within my circle, Indian families with Pakistani physicians. Couple of my crack networkies are Pakistani. May be it is different elsewhere but if you are talking diaspora that just isn't what I see.

When things heat up between India and Pakistan, we have to mutually keep a straight face and get along as though it didn't exist. It is very hard to explain to kids who paly with each other, go to school together, get ragged alike and get the 1st prizes together ...so we have learnt not to touch some topics when such Indo-Pa heat is on.

Now come to the cyber front such as this, all bets are off !!! Suddenly puny Ali sounds like Cassius Clay and geeky Iyer sounds like Rambo.

Your (@masterchief_mirza )point about (if that is what you are saying) all brownies better stick together in gora land, is correct. There is strength in numbers.


Added: but you are in the bargain continuing the blunder that other Pakistanis did - which is to explain away failures as due to Indian influence. Why would you dismiss the contribution of Pakistan's disastrous OBL policy as not contributing to your image? you housed that terrorist in Abbottabad, how can you avoid being branded terrorist ? think about that.
 
Last edited:
.
Your (@masterchief_mirza )point about (if that is what you are saying) all brownies better stick together in gora land, is correct. There is strength in numbers
It's possible that UK and USA experiences are different, for which I cannot account personally. I am speaking of UK experiences but I suspect there are similarities elsewhere. The policy has in my opinion failed and should not be repeated. The communities have diverged beyond all recognition in terms of interests and this is in no small part due to events back in the subcontinent. It was inevitable all along perhaps. It is what it is.
Why would you dismiss the contribution of Pakistan's disastrous OBL policy as not contributing to your image? you housed that terrorist in Abbottabad, how can you avoid being branded terrorist ? think about that.
Again this is separate to what I was discussing. You're talking about overall perceptions of the Pakistani community, which is not exclusively based on the India vs Pakistan dynamic. I'm referring solely to the dynamic between Indian and Pakistani communities. We have known each other far far longer and we understand the machinations of our respective governments at a far deeper level than average white folks in USA or UK understand or choose to acknowledge theirs; they are presented even today with a sanitised reality. Indians would be fooling nobody on these forum pages if they showed up under some pretence of perpetual guru-led peacemongering and being locked in some eternal state of nascent innocence while engaged in a "war on terror" of their own. Pakistanis smell that fictitious conjecture a mile off. The very mechanics of Indian warfare against Pakistan in 1971 and even earlier during the partition period was substantially dependent on an "irregular" element that was exceptionally brutal against unarmed civilians and is what westerners with sufficient knowledge and lacking bias would refer to quite easily as terrorism. It is sheer unadulterated pretence for Indians to declare Pakistanis as supporters of "terrorism" when India itself has adopted terror tactics to brutalise civilian populations into submission since even before partition. India simply happens to find itself on one particular side of the global political calculus and has done for a couple of decades now. In reality, India (like Pakistan) regards what the enemy terms "terrorists" as freedom fighters or legitimate military assets. OBL is perhaps a unique case, falling out of the scope of even that definition but even still, he was always somebody's legitimate asset, so let's not kid ourselves.
 
.
It's possible that UK and USA experiences are different, for which I cannot account personally. I am speaking of UK experiences but I suspect there are similarities elsewhere. The policy has in my opinion failed and should not be repeated. The communities have diverged beyond all recognition in terms of interests and this is in no small part due to events back in the subcontinent. It was inevitable all along perhaps. It is what it is.

Again this is separate to what I was discussing. You're talking about overall perceptions of the Pakistani community, which is not exclusively based on the India vs Pakistan dynamic. I'm referring solely to the dynamic between Indian and Pakistani communities. We have known each other far far longer and we understand the machinations of our respective governments at a far deeper level than average white folks in USA or UK understand or choose to acknowledge theirs; they are presented even today with a sanitised reality. Indians would be fooling nobody on these forum pages if they showed up under some pretence of perpetual guru-led peacemongering and being locked in some eternal state of nascent innocence while engaged in a "war on terror" of their own. Pakistanis smell that fictitious conjecture a mile off. The very mechanics of Indian warfare against Pakistan in 1971 and even earlier during the partition period was substantially dependent on an "irregular" element that was exceptionally brutal against unarmed civilians and is what westerners with sufficient knowledge and lacking bias would refer to quite easily as terrorism. It is sheer unadulterated pretence for Indians to declare Pakistanis as supporters of "terrorism" when India itself has adopted terror tactics to brutalise civilian populations into submission since even before partition. India simply happens to find itself on one particular side of the global political calculus and has done for a couple of decades now. In reality, India (like Pakistan) regards what the enemy terms "terrorists" as freedom fighters or legitimate military assets. OBL is perhaps a unique case, falling out of the scope of even that definition but even still, he was always somebody's legitimate asset, so let's not kid ourselves.

It is the exact same, until last year when it became awkward between Indians and Pakistanis. Alhamdulilah, I predicted the Hindutva trend of India in 2008 and steered clear of any who may show signs of those beliefs.

Still now Indians come to Pakistani grocery stores to shop, everyone can see the looks of anger and hate on their faces like an open book.

Pakistanis regularly employed and helped Indians get established in the US, but when Modiism came to India, they showed their fangs.

I was boycotting India since mid-2000s and Pakistanis would be astonished at my actions, but now they universally agree.
 
.
@HRK - why did you -ve rate this? it was posted in response to the OP's asking if India should be broken up along religious lines and I said no; and asked the same about Pakistan. If you don't like such a question then delete the provocation by the OP first if you are sincere
This guy hrk is misusing his powers....the other day i said all south asians including dalits share same DNA..he couldn't stomach it and gave that post a negative rating.
That is the kind of discrimination pakistan as a society have...they cant bear the fact that dalits share same DNA as them...irony is majority of pakistanis themselves are either from dalit or backward caste background( so are indian and bangladeshi muslims)...these people converted to escape discrimination in hindu religiion but today they forgot their past and are discriminating against their own dalits.
Pakistanis say they are muslims...but their thoughts even today resemble those of hindus who discriminate against dalits.
 
Last edited:
.
It is the exact same, until last year when it became awkward between Indians and Pakistanis. Alhamdulilah, I predicted the Hindutva trend of India in 2008 and steered clear of any who may show signs of those beliefs.

Still now Indians come to Pakistani grocery stores to shop, everyone can see the looks of anger and hate on their faces like an open book.

Pakistanis regularly employed and helped Indians get established in the US, but when Modiism came to India, they showed their fangs.

I was boycotting India since mid-2000s and Pakistanis would be astonished at my actions, but now they universally agree.

I have been in the US nearly 40 years. What are you on about - there are 5 to 7 times more Indian shops relative Pakistani and if anything, a lot of Pakistanis come shop in the Indian stores too. It makes no difference whether Indian or Pakistani - the behavior, treatment interests are identical. Guess it make you feel better to say Pakistanis regularly employed & helped Indians, fine if that's how you get your kicks!
 
.
I once met one Indian-Yemen hybrid in undergrad and I have not seen a single creature worse. He was talking about how Yemen needs to split into different countries. When he found out I was Pakistani, he totally pretended I didn't exist. So scared was he that I would be on to him. Difficult because we were in the same masjid and MSA. He pretended he was fully Yemeni, while talking garbage against Arabs in general.

I also met an Iranian who passed himself as an Al Balushi in undergrad and he was rabidly anti-Pakistani, when I questioned him about tribal origin, he could not even tell me a single thing.

I hate fakers.


You cant trust them. I was at uni and there was these, group of guys one Pakistani, one Chinese, two Arabs, two Indians. The group were friends but more out of interest of group assignment collaboration. The Indian called Krish got busted downloading one of the guys works off the computer. So he was confronted and his USB memory stick was checked and confirmed for stealing data.

As for Afghans, some are real romantic assoles who talk glory days and it was Pakistan's fault that Afghanistan is in a mess. They go on bout how they some kind of aryan superior race but this guy looked like teletubbie.
 
.
You cant trust them. I was at uni and there was these, group of guys one Pakistani, one Chinese, two Arabs, two Indians. The group were friends but more out of interest of group assignment collaboration. The Indian called Krish got busted downloading one of the guys works off the computer. So he was confronted and his USB memory stick was checked and confirmed for stealing data.

Absolutely anything can be expected from Indians, but they lack the capability to cover their tracks.

In that aspect, Zionists can be the most vicious.

I knew one SL who got into a fight with an Indian, he put coke in his laptop battery compartment. That Indian got busted at the airport. Absolutely brutal.

As for Afghans, some are real romantic assoles who talk glory days and it was Pakistan's fault that Afghanistan is in a mess. They go on bout how they some kind of aryan superior race but this guy looked like teletubbie.

Secular nationalist Afghans, Iranians, and Arabs are simply the worst. Alhamdulilah they get plenty of flak from their own countrymen and others.

I am glad Afghan Kabulie are experiencing the Taliban experience.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom