Shabaz Sharif
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2006
- Messages
- 4,000
- Reaction score
- -15
- Country
- Location
Ranjeet Singh Indian Just because there are Sikhs in India doesn't mean he was Indian. He was brave son of soil and Indians sikhs are known for killing innocent and un armed people like they did in 1947.
They though they would rule Lahore in 1965 like Ranjeet Singh did but they forget one important thing, the blood in their veins is that of Indians even if they converted to Sikhsm. So the real sons of Lahore gave them danda in their a hole and after that they never looked at Lahore again. After that Hindu baniyas has been giving them dandas ever since, do you think Ranjeet Singh would have allowed Hindu baniyas to behave like that to Sikhs?
And these wars were not between sikhs & muslims but between different regions and the reasons were gain control and profits. Ranjeet Singh army had muslims since they had majority, i also heard that some Pashtun helped him. Read history without your RSS glasses.
They though they would rule Lahore in 1965 like Ranjeet Singh did but they forget one important thing, the blood in their veins is that of Indians even if they converted to Sikhsm. So the real sons of Lahore gave them danda in their a hole and after that they never looked at Lahore again. After that Hindu baniyas has been giving them dandas ever since, do you think Ranjeet Singh would have allowed Hindu baniyas to behave like that to Sikhs?
And these wars were not between sikhs & muslims but between different regions and the reasons were gain control and profits. Ranjeet Singh army had muslims since they had majority, i also heard that some Pashtun helped him. Read history without your RSS glasses.