What's new

High Court directs ISI to Remove Blockades from Public Road!

ISI HQ really should move.

Comparing it to CIA HQ at Langley does not make any sense. CIA HQ is not nestled in the heart of the US capital with shared walls / directly neighboring one of the main roads and various other public and private buildings (universities, homes, etc.) CIA HQ is on its own huge site with very restricted access and no direct neighbors.
bro, you really think that building is the real & the actual HQ? , that is just the office building for holding conferences & meetings &where DG sb sits.....Operations HQ are de-centrelaized and spread across the city ....don't wana name any sites or areas but even the tech centers are away from the center
 
.
bro, you really think that building is the real & the actual HQ? , that is just the office building for holding conferences & meetings &where DG sb sits.....Operations HQ are de-centrelaized and spread across the city ....don't wana name any sites or areas but even the tech centers are away from the center

I know brother, I've been to both the central and some of the de-centralized locations --- what I meant to say is that whether it's an administrative or operational HQ, it should not be where it is (in my humble opinion.) A number of top DGs and their top staff (in addition to the DG I of course) DO sit here.
 
.
Yup,only patriots are those,who have forefathers who served British Empire and were Pet Dogs of Empire before 14th August 2359 but all others including Fatima Jinnah,Bengalis,Liquat Ali khan and many more who raise there Voice are agent of yahood and hanood.
Actually the pets of British helped Muslim League win 1945-46 elections(jagirdars and wadairas). If it were not these khotay sikkay, there would have been no Pakistan.

The military(British pets) was not financially corrupt in 1965-71 days, the soldiers and officers were patriotic alike..... corruption and kickbacks started during Zia's tenure.
For that they deserve a medal,for costing us thousands of lives.
If the terrorists had a small group with a small number of people sympathetic to their cause then I would have agreed with your statement. That unfortunately was not the case. We are talking about thousands of terrorists, supporters and potential future recruits residing in Pakistan and Afghanistan, defeating them was an uphill task in any case...esp after post op silence when those who were targeted by suicide bombers were abusing the army and praising the bombers.
 
Last edited:
.
So now will the judiciary also take responsibility of bomb blasts ?
 
.
The military(British pets) was not financially corrupt in 1965-71 days, the soldiers and officers were patriotic alike..... corruption and kickbacks started during Zia's tenure.
Well at that time if you know a Female Dog,with lantern in neck was praded during elections in 1966 and lantern was symbol of Miss Fatima Jinnah.
And in 1971 we lost half of country,an event about which i can't quote an Example out of history.
Actually the pets of British helped Muslim League win 1945-46 elections(jagirdars and wadairas). If it were not these khotay sikkay, there would have been no Pakistan.
Forget it man,ML decided in 1940 that,they would have Pakistan,if not this decade then the next one,but surely would have.
If the terrorists had a small group with a small number of people sympathetic to their cause then I would have agreed with your statement. That unfortunately was not the case. We are talking about thousands of terrorists, supporters and potential future recruits residing in Pakistan and Afghanistan, defeating them was an uphill task in any case...esp after post op silence when those who were targeted by suicide bombers were abusing the army and praising the bombers.
Failure has no condone.
 
.
Forget it man,ML decided in 1940 that,they would have Pakistan,if not this decade then the next one,but surely would have.
Then why did they chose the same dirty people everyone else wanted as candidates?
That is because they couldn't win without the help of dirty people, just like Imran Khan couldn't form a govt without dirty people.
Welcome to the parliamentary system.
And in 1971 we lost half of country,an event about which i can't quote an Example out of history.
It was writing on the wall, two swords can't be in one sheath. Neither them nor us were willing to concede power. It would have happened with or without Indian intervention.

Making strategic blunders during war doesn't imply that one is unpatriotic or financially corrupt; they didn't make big jaidads after retirement, regardless of how poor their performance was or how dull they were...It can be incompetence or lack of decision making power.
 
.
Then why did they chose the same dirty people everyone else wanted as candidates?
They jumped into ML bandwagon,when it was clear to them that Pakistan is going to be reality.
That is because they couldn't win without the help of dirty people, just like Imran Khan couldn't form a govt without dirty people.
Imran khan is scumbug who is just dyeing for KURSI in that process he has forgotton everything.
It was writing on the wall, two swords can't be in one sheath. Neither them nor us were willing to concede power. It would have happened 4. with or without Indian intervention.
Don't push what never happened in histroy,if Ayub would have contested 1966 election fairly that would have never happened.
Making strategic blunders during war doesn't imply that one is unpatriotic or financially corrupt; they didn't make big jaidads after retirement, regardless of how poor their performance was or how dull they were...It can be incompetence or lack of decision making power.
Were they trialed for these blunders?
I guess blunder after blunder and getting clean chit everytime has landed us into pile of humiliation from siachen into kargil into WOT into..........
Blunders at strategic decision making has costed death to empires.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom