The fact that we have only one post. Remember you are yet to prove that these ridges belong to one single peak.
Are you altering my words, to claim you are right, I used the word 'peak'.
P.S Pakistan just occupies one peak in Kargil, that too surrounded by Indian peaks on all the sides..and It lost hundreds and thousands (4000 as per your Prime minister) soldiers to gain that.
To which you replied
Like always I am being forced to correct you. We have at most 6 and at least 4 Indian posts in the Kargil region.
You automatically changed 'peak' to posts..where as I made no such claim..then again,
why were you forced to correct me?
So a claim that you made out of nowhere. And when we ask you to prove it. It become nonsensical.
This is stupid. How does that prove that all the 6 ridges or posts belonged to a single peak. Yes. A post can be control without control on the peak. It looks like your guess work and you have no concrete proof with you for your claim.
Because it is common sense it is not possible to control ridge or lower post unless , you have the overlooking peak in your control. and vice versa. If one has the control underlying ridges and post, the enemy can not maintain control the peak, as your supply lines to the peak are choked.
As far as spoon feeding you, you can do you own research, and the fact is there is only peak here i.e point 5353.
By the way Dhalunag which according to you is part of Peak 5353 wasn't even part of the Kargil operations according to your ex army chief. May be you know better than him or may be he was trying to hide something. In any case your guesswork is unacceptable.
To what are you referring too here?
Yes. It is you who himself assumed that all of them are ridges. Some might be ridge other might not be ridges but simple posts. Whatever the case it is. It is all guesswork from you and I would surely love to see the prove that all the 5 posts are ridges and all of them belong to one single peak 5353.
the fact is there is the
only peak here i.e point 5353 in Pakistani control
Yeah I know. Just proves my point.
This not even close thing is debateable. And can be a figment of imagination of a Bharati fanboy. According to dawn:
Pakistani PoWs: correct figure - Newspaper - DAWN.COM
There is 50% figure for you. Including paramilitary and police it is 50%. Not even close? Really?
By the way the source you have used also quote some Chopra guy who seems to be a Bharati. Not credible enough in my opinion.
The Pakistani author of the research paper has taken these numbers From
Surendra Chopra's book "Post Simla Indo-Pakistan Relation: Confrontation to De-escalation"
are corrected down to a single digit, where as Dawn's is just rounded of its numbers,
where did Dawn get it numbers from?
Good. I am not forcing you to not believe it either. Just don't present it as a fact to us. Keep your believes to yourself. Your delusions are meant for you. Not for us.
They are not my delusions, these the facts given the highest official in your country. They are your burden to disprove not mine to prove.
I believe at most 453 soldiers of my army were martyred in that war as compared to your 527 casualties.
Why do you believe that, because you army says so?
But they were the ones claiming, not a single Pakistani soldiers is in kargil, they are all Mujahideen, so how all of a sudden they have 453 dead soldiers? Just shows the credibility of your army's claims!!
BTW what about you General in Command claims, that Pakistan lost only 353 soldiers, was he lying too?
Yeah you guys live in your delusions. One major reason why most of your parliament has criminal cases against it.
Whatever? Atleast we dont believe we have elected a Moron into office?
And I don't care about your opinion about us. Unless you present it to attack us.
Not really. Never ever. We didn't lose 4k soldiers. I am again asking you keep your believes to yourself. Don't force them on us. You are free to remain in your lala land.
Well you are free to choose what ever you believe, we have you prime minister statement to back us, you have nothing to counter it with. Your army chief is giving a different number, you army websites are giving different, and your prime minister different!!