Harvard research puts BD in low growth category

[Baby Leone]

It did not say about the author.. it gave the contact address of
Center for International Development

I am still convinced that the author is an Indian origing graduate student under mr Chuck McKenney. I made sure calling that number.




About the Center for International Development
The Center for International Development (CID) at Harvard University is a university-wide center that works to advance the understanding of development challenges and offer viable solutions to problems of global poverty. CID is Harvard’s leading research hub focusing on resolving the dilemmas of public policy associated with generating stable, shared, and sustainable prosperity in developing countries. Our ongoing mission is to revolutionize the world of development practice.

Contact: Chuck McKenney

Email: chuck_mckenney@hks.harvard.edu

Phone: (617) 495-4112

if he would be an indian he would not have placed Pakistan as the 2nd fastest growing economy in that period he would have done that to their dear bangladesh. the papers are based on research with and market data and the consistency and credibility of growths posted by govts.

 

[TopCat]

if he would be an indian he would not have placed Pakistan as the 2nd fastest growing economy in that period he would have done that to their dear bangladesh. the papers are based on research with and market data and the consistency and credibility of growths posted by govts.

I bet its a female indian and got confused in everything.

 

[Śakra]

My 5 dollar in it that the author is an Indian.

Put that way that's consider a HUGE sum of many in bengledash. We don't want anything from gareeb lok.

 

[Flynn Swagmire]

Chill guys, we ranked low and it is ok. We need more improvements...

 

[Logicaldude]

if he would be an indian he would not have placed Pakistan as the 2nd fastest growing economy in that period he would have done that to their dear bangladesh. the papers are based on research with and market data and the consistency and credibility of growths posted by govts.

Even if it is an Indian in the team, he or she will follow a consistent methodology that will be disclosed, reviewed and approved by Harvard. An Indian who has made it to Harvard is going to be more serious in life than the two bit religious turds one encounters on the forum. You can be sure of that.

 

[TopCat]

Even if it is an Indian in the team, he or she will follow a consistent methodology that will be disclosed, reviewed and approved by Harvard. An Indian who has made it to Harvard is going to be more serious in life than the two bit religious turds one encounters on the forum. You can be sure of that.

YOu got no clue about harvard. Have you ever been to harvard or you only heard the name of it?
For your info Swami ji was also a teacher of Harvard.

 

[ito]

Economic complexity along with economic growth measures the economic potential. Although India is projected to grow above 7.5% every year. It is economic complexity is 46 much below China's 23.

 

[Logicaldude]

YOu got no clue about harvard. Have you ever been to harvard or you only heard the name of it?
For your info Swami ji was also a teacher of Harvard.

None of swami s trash was approved by Harvard. He managed to get kicked out even.

But that's irrelevant. Any study is just a intellectual exercise that can be questioned and back tested without making baseless guesswork about nationality and gender of the scholars involved. It just reflects very badly on u.

 

[gslv mk3]

YOu got no clue about harvard. Have you ever been to harvard or you only heard the name of it?
For your info Swami ji was also a teacher of Harvard.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_School_of_Government

 

[TopCat]

None of swami s trash was approved by Harvard. He managed to get kicked out even.

But that's irrelevant. Any study is just a intellectual exercise that can be questioned and back tested without making baseless guesswork about nationality and gender of the scholars involved. It just reflects very badly on u.

Knowing the background of the author is a great start before getting into the actual contents.

 

[Logicaldude]

Knowing the background of the author is a great start before getting into the actual contents.

And guessing someone's background because one did not like a report they made is just plain stupid.

 

[Flynn Swagmire]

two bit religious turds

Why you brought religion in a non religious argument? faggot...

 

[Śakra]

@Nilgiri

 

[Logicaldude]

Why you brought religion in a non religious argument? faggot...

 

[Flynn Swagmire]

View attachment 410098

Wanna see my dick pic?

Its good. Isn't it?