Guys without hurting anyone's feeling just need to raise some points of concern for the readers;
UN is always active when there independence movements are taking place within any muslim country by an minorities i.e. East Timor (Independence within 3 months of major uprising), North Sudan. But when any muslim population in a region within a non-muslim country are struggling of independence then their freedom struggle are completely ignored/ falling on deaf ears i.e. Palestine (More than 60 years old issue), Kashmir (More than 60 years old issue), Chechniya (Decades old issue), Bosnia (Non acceptance of Muslim state within Europe resulting in mass genocide against muslims & creation of a nation with Christian neighbours who were involved in that genocide) etc. These are only some examples. What the world has to say about it. No proper or acceptable justifications except 'HYPOCRACY' at its best.
Thanks
I think for a Muslim, it might appear so as you see.
However, the flip side is that the Serbs feel that in an area of Christian majority, the US and other Christian allies have sided with Muslims and have created a whole lot of Muslim States.
It is all a question of location. econmic and strategic interests.
If you notice, wherever the colonialists have gone and then had to leave, they have left problems of ethnic/religious warring.
If you observe the Middle East, which is all Muslim, the British drew arbitrary boundaries to suit their convenience and put their favourites in power. The resultant is that there is continuous infighting and problems.
Kuwait, for instance, is actually a part of Iraq and Saddam was not wrong in invading to make a wrong into a right.
But then, by creating Kuwait, the British ensured that there are areas of conflict.
Even the Division of India into India and Pakistan, was deliberately left vague so that there a fights, and being in the UN, they would still be able to manipulate both and they are doing it even now!
This is what is called realpolitik!