What's new

Han Chinese Y Chromosome Test Results

Status
Not open for further replies.

Srinivas

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
12,455
Reaction score
-26
Country
India
Location
India
Han Chinese Y Chromosome Test Results


January 24, 2008 in China, Weird Science | Tags: anthropology, DNA, North China, South China, Y Chromosome


This is not shocking, I’ve seen many test results that show Northern Chinese tend to group with North East Asians (Japanese and Koreans) and Southern Chinese tend to group more with Southeast Asians. The populations also have distinct (but often overlapping) appearances. Many of my Chinese friends have told me it is due to diet and climate. I do not think so.

The early genetic research (The History and Geography of Human Genes, 1996) of Dr. Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza showed that Northern Chinese could be grouped with other Northeast Asians (Koreans, Tungusic groups, Japanese) and that Southern Chinese grouped more with Southeast Asians, making the Han Chinese aggregate an intermediate population between the two, which matches their location geographic location. This new report gives us some detail as to the way this population cline occurred.

Based on what I know of Chinese history, Southern China was settled by the Han much later than the North and the people in the South were considered “barbarian” referred to as the various types of “Yue” (known as the 100 Yue) in later times. Eventually the people region that became Guangdong and North Vietnam were referred to as (Nan Yue, or South Viet). Most of these people were likely Austroasiatic speakers in origin (like present day Vietnamese and Cambodians). Since Northern Vietnam (Annam) was part of China on and off for over 1,000 years; and the south, by the end of Chinese colonization was controlled by Champa, a Malay people (Austronesian).

As far as I know there was a massive influx of Han Chinese into the region during the Song Dynasty due to Barbarian pressure in the north. I know assimilation was fairly complete by the Tang Dynasty as Cantonese speakers often call themselves “Tong (Tang in Mandarin) People” and talk of giving their children “Tong names”. They also still refer to their province and themselves as “Yue” to this day. I’m guessing by the Late Tang, the Sinization of the area was complete, but for Annam. Vietnam became independent from China after the disintegration of the Tang, since the “Viet or Yue” people lived in what is now Guangdong as well, I’m guessing by that time the people in Guangdong were mostly Sinized, and considered themselves Han Chinese, but most of the people further South did not.

Also, “South,” in China is the area from Shanghai down to the border of the Southeast Asian nations of Laos and Vietnam.

Other nonHan ethnicities lived in the South, such as the Lao/Thai (Tai-Kadai language group) folks also came from Central China and were pushed South by the Han, they still have relatives in modern China like the Zhuang and Dong peoples.

To wrap it up, it is not shocking that Han men (like many men before them all over the world) would move to an area and take it over, while enslaving, killing, or running off the native men using their superior technology and social organization. Then they would marry, rape, or concubine the local women. Men, historically, are not picky about who they have sexual relations with. In a desperate spot any woman (even a barbarian) will do.

This new study provides more detail to earlier studies whose results where along the same lines.

—————–

European Journal of Human Genetics advance online publication 23 January 2008; doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201998
A spatial analysis of genetic structure of human populations in China reveals distinct difference between maternal and paternal lineages

Fuzhong Xue et al.

Analyses of archeological, anatomical, linguistic, and genetic data suggested consistently the presence of a significant boundary between the populations of north and south in China. However, the exact location and the strength of this boundary have remained controversial. In this study, we systematically explored the spatial genetic structure and the boundary of north–south division of human populations using mtDNA data in 91 populations and Y-chromosome data in 143 populations. Our results highlight a distinct difference between spatial genetic structures of maternal and paternal lineages.

A substantial genetic differentiation between northern and southern populations is the characteristic of maternal structure, with a significant uninterrupted genetic boundary extending approximately along the Huai River and Qin Mountains north to Yangtze River. On the paternal side, however, no obvious genetic differentiation between northern and southern populations is revealed.

The southern Chinese are completely different from that of northern Hans.
 
This is not shocking, I’ve seen many test results that show Northern Chinese tend to group with North East Asians
"Northern Han Chinese" are not really Han Chinese, but the descendants of various Altaic kingdoms that occupied present day Northern China(Which weren't Chinese territories in the old days).

Southern Chinese tend to group more with Southeast Asians.
Han Chinese are Southeast Asians originating from Burma. Sinitic languages are offshoots of the Burmese language family.

Let me put it simply. The Great Wall was the historic border between Han Chinese and Altaic people, and these two have totally different linguistic and genetic makeups and are no more related to each other than are between Chinese and Europeans.

shanyuhz2.jpg

A confrontation between Altaic people and Han Chinese in the old days.
 
Y usually signify the conquerors, X signify natives.

It's not surprising as Chinese enlarge their territory from north to south by conquering the locals. We can say in most China they have homogeneous Y genes.
 
This Will Give Our Han Chinese Members serious Case of Gas . :rofl:
 
Chinese people are not homogenous as they claim to be. That is the default inferrence.
Spelled inference.
And that is what I inferred to. However, that in itself, proves nothing, India is not homogeneous (Again, you misspelled it) either
 
Spelled inference.
And that is what I inferred to. However, that in itself, proves nothing, India is not homogeneous (Again, you misspelled it) either

Maybe he meant

Homogenous, whose corresponding noun is homogeny, is a biological term meaning similar in structure between organs or parts.

Seems fitting for this thread...

While yours is

Homogeneous means (1) of the same or similar nature, and (2) uniform in structure or composition. Its corresponding noun is homogeneity.
.

No need to pick on someone else's grammar when your own isn't fully developed, no?
 
Seems fitting for this thread...

While yours is

.

No need to pick on someone else's grammar when your own isn't fully developed, no?
He wasn't talking about genes, he was talking about uniformity
 
Spelled inference.
And that is what I inferred to. However, that in itself, proves nothing, India is not homogeneous (Again, you misspelled it) either

This is what i am saying modern China is made up of smaller knigdoms as does India. Chinese have lot of cultures like India.
 
This is what i am saying modern China is made up of smaller knigdoms as does India. Chinese have lot of cultures like India.
No, after the obliteration of all culture under the communist regime, they have no culture and are cosmopolitan
 
I don't get what this is trying to prove.

If you are trying to say that China was a bunch was warring states like India then you are mostly wrong. While the exact size of China has changed over time, there has almost always been an Emperor. Espcially in the last 1000-1500 years.
 
I don't get what this is trying to prove.

If you are trying to say that China was a bunch was warring states like India then you are mostly wrong. While the exact size of China has changed over time, there has almost always been an Emperor. Espcially in the last 1000-1500 years.

I am not saying anything related to Chinese emperor. All i am saying is Chinese genese are not all same and there exist major cultural differences between north China,south China,Xingxang and Tibet.
 
Y usually signify the conquerors, X signify natives.

It's not surprising as Chinese enlarge their territory from north to south by conquering the locals. We can say in most China they have homogeneous Y genes.

This is true, most Han males have the unique Y-DNA O3a, which is the commonly descended from the Proto-Sino-Tibetan folks.

So the theory of the Sino-Tibetan family does hold from the perspectives of both Y-DNA and language family.

However the theory of the Indo-European is a bit far-fetched as we all know the gene marker for the Proto-Indo-European is R1a, which is only prevalent among the Balto-Slavic-Indo-Iranian groups, whereas the Indo-European speakers from the West Europe has almost none of the R1a marker, why these western euros keep referring themselves as the Indo-Europeans when none of them was actually descended from the Proto-Indo-European folks? :coffee:
 
"Northern Han Chinese" are not really Han Chinese, but the descendants of various Altaic kingdoms that occupied present day Northern China(Which weren't Chinese territories in the old days).


Han Chinese are Southeast Asians originating from Burma. Sinitic languages are offshoots of the Burmese language family.

Let me put it simply. The Great Wall was the historic border between Han Chinese and Altaic people, and these two have totally different linguistic and genetic makeups and are no more related to each other than are between Chinese and Europeans.

shanyuhz2.jpg

A confrontation between Altaic people and Han Chinese in the old days.
Please,Don't talk like korean were altaic worriors,you were slave of them.They have the unique Y-DNA C.And now more than 80% of them except turks belong to china.
Why korean like to take pride from what manchus and mongols had achieved?They treated you bad as well.Manchus took nearly 1/10 of your population in one battle if I am not wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom